Dividend comparison

VT vs QQQ: Which Is Better?

Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.

VT vs QQQ: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
  • Fees. VT is cheaper at 0.06% a year versus 0.18% for QQQ. On $10,000 that is $12 a year less in fees.
  • Income. VT pays more income, yielding 1.53% over the last twelve months versus 0.53% for QQQ. That is about $100 more a year on $10,000. Both pay annual.
  • Performance. Over the last 5 years, QQQ returned 97.0% versus 60.7% for VT, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $19,698 in QQQ and $16,069 in VT.
  • Risk. QQQ has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -35.1%, against -26.4% for VT.
  • Diversification. VT holds 9,773 positions and QQQ holds 102. The ten largest positions make up 22.3% of VT and 47.2% of QQQ.
  • Overlap. At least 28% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 32 shared holdings.
  • Dividend growth. QQQ grew its yearly payout 13.3% a year over the last 4 years, versus 7.1% for VT.
  • Size. QQQ is the larger fund with $487.5 billion in assets, against $101.2 billion for VT.

Bottom line: VT fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. QQQ fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth.

Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
MetricVT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Dividend yield (TTM)1.53%0.53%
Dividend / share (TTM)$2.41$3.79
Payout frequencyAnnualAnnual
Last dividend$0.4084 on Sep 22, 2026$0.7514 on Oct 8, 2026
Ex-dividend dateSep 18, 2026Dec 21, 2026
Next payment—$0.7941 on Dec 28, 2026
Dividend growth (CAGR)7.1% over 4 yrs13.3% over 4 yrs
Price$157.80$717.63
Beta0.931.23
Max drawdown (5Y)-26.4%-35.1%
Market cap$101.30B$479.05B
ExchangeAMEXNASDAQ
Expense ratio0.06%0.18%
Assets under management$101.20B$487.46B
Number of holdings9773102
Top 10 concentration22.3%47.2%
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.

VT

$12.75/mo

$153 /yr at 1.53% yield

QQQ

$4.40/mo

$53 /yr at 0.53% yield

Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. VT pays annual; QQQ pays annual.
YearVTQQQ
2025$2.5732$2.7949
2024$2.2939$3.0623
2023$2.1419$2.3200
2022$1.8957$2.1351
2021$1.9550$1.6968
Strategy: Broad index
Low-cost funds that hold an entire market or index at market-cap weights and make no attempt to select securities. Return is the index return less a small fee, and dividends are a by-product of what the underlying companies choose to pay rather than an objective of the strategy. Differences between funds tracking the same index usually come down to fee, wrapper structure, share price and trading liquidity, not to holdings.

Current income is low and outside your control, so these need pairing with something else if the portfolio has to produce cash today.

What VT vs QQQ actually do

One fund holding the whole global stock market, around ten thousand companies across developed and emerging markets including the US.

It tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index at market-cap weights, so US companies make up the majority of the fund simply because they are the majority of world market value, with the remainder spread across developed international and emerging markets. Weights shift as those markets grow or shrink relative to each other, so the allocation decision is made by the market rather than by you. Holding non-US companies brings currency exposure and foreign withholding tax, and the headline yield is usually a little higher than a US-only fund because many international companies pay out more of their earnings.

Suits an investor who wants a single, permanently self-rebalancing global equity holding and no home-country judgment call. Not for someone who wants to control their US weighting deliberately, and not an income fund.

Core holding, global

Invesco's fund tracking the Nasdaq-100, the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.

The index is modified market-cap weighted and excludes financials by rule, which is why it lands so heavily in technology, communication services and consumer discretionary names. In December 2025 the fund converted from a unit investment trust to a conventional open-end fund and cut its fee, so it can now reinvest income and lend securities like its peers. It remains the most liquid Nasdaq-100 vehicle by a wide margin and the reference asset for a large share of the options-income products in this category.

Suits investors who want concentrated large-cap growth exposure and anyone who needs deep options liquidity. Dividends are incidental, so it does not answer an income mandate on its own.

Growth-tilted core, concentrated

Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $16,069 in VT and $19,698 in QQQ.
PeriodVTQQQ
1 month-0.47%-0.43%
3 months1.95%3.10%
Year to date11.87%17.09%
1 year13.16%17.78%
3 years80.78%105.61%
5 years60.69%96.98%
  • VT
  • QQQ
61139216202120222023202420252026161197

Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
  • VT
  • QQQ
0%15%29%44%59%Technology31.9%58.8%Communication Services7.2%12.1%Consumer Cyclical8.1%10.2%Industrials10.5%5.5%Financial Services15.6%0.2%Healthcare8.5%4.4%Consumer Defensive4.3%6.1%Basic Materials4.1%1.0%Energy3.9%0.5%Utilities2.2%1.1%Other3.7%0.2%
VT vs QQQ holdings overlap
At least 28% overlap by weight, with 32 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
Largest shared holdingsVT weightQQQ weight
NVDANVIDIA Corp4.52%8.17%
AAPLApple Inc4.08%7.82%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.23%6.19%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc2.05%4.42%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc1.72%3.15%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.39%2.49%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.35%3.28%
GOOGAlphabet Inc1.35%2.94%
MUMicron Technology Inc1.02%4.41%
TSLATesla Inc0.88%3.02%
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.

VT9773 holdings total

NameWeight
NVDANVIDIA Corp4.52%
AAPLApple Inc4.08%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.23%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc2.05%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc1.72%
2330.TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd1.62%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.39%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.35%
GOOGAlphabet Inc1.35%
MUMicron Technology Inc1.02%

QQQ102 holdings total

NameWeight
NVDANVIDIA Corp8.17%
AAPLApple Inc7.82%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.19%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc4.42%
MUMicron Technology Inc4.41%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.79%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.28%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.15%
TSLATesla Inc3.02%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.94%

Quick verdict

VT fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. QQQ fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.

Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how VT vs QQQ fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.

Frequently asked questions

Is VT or QQQ better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. VT currently yields 1.53% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while QQQ yields 0.53%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between VT and QQQ?
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF listed on NASDAQ. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, VT or QQQ?
VT has the lower expense ratio. VT charges 0.06% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, a difference of $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, VT or QQQ?
Over the last 5 years, QQQ has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: VT returned 60.7% and QQQ returned 97.0%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, VT or QQQ?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, QQQ has been riskier: VT fell as much as 26.4% and QQQ as much as 35.1%. Their betas are 0.93 and 1.23.
How much do VT and QQQ overlap?
At least 28% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 32 shared holdings. The largest shared positions are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT. Holding both still adds meaningful diversification.
How often do VT and QQQ pay dividends?
Both pay annual. The most recent payments were $0.4084 for VT and $0.7514 for QQQ.
How much income does $10,000 in VT vs QQQ generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in VT would generate roughly $12.75 per month ($153 annually). The same amount in QQQ would produce about $4.40 per month ($53 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both VT and QQQ?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare VT vs QQQ with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how VT and QQQ fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.

Related comparisons

For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.