Dividend comparison
VT vs SPGM: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF and State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. VT is cheaper at 0.06% a year versus 0.09% for SPGM. On $10,000 that is $3 a year less in fees.
- Income. SPGM pays more income, yielding 1.78% over the last twelve months versus 1.53% for VT. That is about $26 more a year on $10,000. VT pays annual, SPGM pays semi-annual.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, SPGM returned 66.8% versus 60.7% for VT, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $16,684 in SPGM and $16,069 in VT.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 5 years were similar: -26.4% for VT and -25.9% for SPGM from peak to trough.
- Diversification. VT holds 9,773 positions and SPGM holds 2,865. The ten largest positions make up 22.3% of VT and 22.2% of SPGM.
- Overlap. At least 37% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 66 shared holdings.
- Dividend growth. VT grew its yearly payout 7.1% a year over the last 4 years, versus 6.6% for SPGM.
- Size. VT is the larger fund with $101.2 billion in assets, against $1.8 billion for SPGM.
Bottom line: VT fits better if you care most about lower fees and broader diversification. SPGM fits better if you care most about more income today and stronger 5-year returns.
| Metric | VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | SPGM State Street SPDR Portfolio MSCI Global Stock Market ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 1.53% | 1.78% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $2.41 | $1.54 |
| Payout frequency | Annual | Semi-annual |
| Last dividend | $0.4084 on Sep 22, 2026 | $0.6675 on Jun 5, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 18, 2026 | Jun 1, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 7.1% over 4 yrs | 6.6% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $157.80 | $86.34 |
| Dividend growth streak | — | 3 years |
| Beta | 0.93 | 0.93 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -26.4% | -25.9% |
| Market cap | $101.30B | $1.80B |
| Exchange | AMEX | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.09% |
| Assets under management | $101.20B | $1.81B |
| Number of holdings | 9773 | 2865 |
| Top 10 concentration | 22.3% | 22.2% |
VT
$12.75/mo
$153 /yr at 1.53% yield
SPGM
$14.87/mo
$178 /yr at 1.78% yield
| Year | VT | SPGM |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.5732 | $1.4487 |
| 2024 | $2.2939 | $1.2563 |
| 2023 | $2.1419 | $1.1570 |
| 2022 | $1.8957 | $1.1053 |
| 2021 | $1.9550 | $1.1210 |
Current income is low and outside your control, so these need pairing with something else if the portfolio has to produce cash today.
What VT vs SPGM actually do
It tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index at market-cap weights, so US companies make up the majority of the fund simply because they are the majority of world market value, with the remainder spread across developed international and emerging markets. Weights shift as those markets grow or shrink relative to each other, so the allocation decision is made by the market rather than by you. Holding non-US companies brings currency exposure and foreign withholding tax, and the headline yield is usually a little higher than a US-only fund because many international companies pay out more of their earnings.
Suits an investor who wants a single, permanently self-rebalancing global equity holding and no home-country judgment call. Not for someone who wants to control their US weighting deliberately, and not an income fund.
Core holding, global
| Period | VT | SPGM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.47% | -0.60% |
| 3 months | 1.95% | 2.44% |
| Year to date | 11.87% | 13.43% |
| 1 year | 13.16% | 15.89% |
| 3 years | 80.78% | 86.44% |
| 5 years | 60.69% | 66.84% |
- VT
- SPGM
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- VT
- SPGM
| Largest shared holdings | VT weight | SPGM weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 4.52% | 4.35% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 4.08% | 4.36% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 3.23% | 3.26% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 2.05% | 2.00% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.72% | 1.73% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.35% | 1.35% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 1.35% | 1.44% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.39% | 1.27% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 0.88% | 0.86% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 1.02% | 0.85% |
VT9773 holdings total
Quick verdict
VT fits better if you care most about lower fees and broader diversification. SPGM fits better if you care most about more income today and stronger 5-year returns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is VT or SPGM better for dividend income?
What is the difference between VT and SPGM?
Which is cheaper, VT or SPGM?
Which has performed better, VT or SPGM?
Which is riskier, VT or SPGM?
How much do VT and SPGM overlap?
How often do VT and SPGM pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in VT vs SPGM generate?
Can I hold both VT and SPGM?
Where can I compare VT vs SPGM with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.