Dividend comparison

VTI vs QQQ: Which Is Better?

Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.

VTI vs QQQ: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
  • Fees. VTI is cheaper at 0.03% a year versus 0.18% for QQQ. On $10,000 that is $15 a year less in fees.
  • Income. VTI pays more income, yielding 1.05% over the last twelve months versus 0.53% for QQQ. That is about $52 more a year on $10,000. VTI pays quarterly, QQQ pays annual.
  • Performance. Over the last 5 years, QQQ returned 97.0% versus 72.2% for VTI, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $19,698 in QQQ and $17,219 in VTI.
  • Risk. QQQ has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -35.1%, against -25.4% for VTI.
  • Diversification. VTI holds 3,598 positions and QQQ holds 102. The ten largest positions make up 34.6% of VTI and 47.2% of QQQ.
  • Overlap. At least 45% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 36 shared holdings.
  • Dividend growth. QQQ grew its yearly payout 13.3% a year over the last 4 years, versus 6.4% for VTI.
  • Size. VTI is the larger fund with $2.3 trillion in assets, against $487.5 billion for QQQ.

Bottom line: VTI fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. QQQ fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth.

Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
MetricVTI
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
QQQ
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Dividend yield (TTM)1.05%0.53%
Dividend / share (TTM)$3.95$3.79
Payout frequencyQuarterlyAnnual
Last dividend$0.9555 on Sep 30, 2026$0.7514 on Oct 8, 2026
Ex-dividend dateSep 28, 2026Dec 21, 2026
Next payment—$0.7941 on Dec 28, 2026
Dividend growth (CAGR)6.4% over 4 yrs13.3% over 4 yrs
Price$377.09$717.63
Dividend growth streak5 years—
Beta1.021.23
Max drawdown (5Y)-25.4%-35.1%
Market cap$2.30T$479.05B
ExchangeAMEXNASDAQ
Expense ratio0.03%0.18%
Assets under management$2.30T$487.46B
Number of holdings3598102
Top 10 concentration34.6%47.2%
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.

VTI

$8.72/mo

$105 /yr at 1.05% yield

QQQ

$4.40/mo

$53 /yr at 0.53% yield

Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. VTI pays quarterly; QQQ pays annual.
YearVTIQQQ
2025$3.7566$2.7949
2024$3.6743$3.0623
2023$3.4128$2.3200
2022$3.1833$2.1351
2021$2.9303$1.6968
Strategy: Broad index
Low-cost funds that hold an entire market or index at market-cap weights and make no attempt to select securities. Return is the index return less a small fee, and dividends are a by-product of what the underlying companies choose to pay rather than an objective of the strategy. Differences between funds tracking the same index usually come down to fee, wrapper structure, share price and trading liquidity, not to holdings.

Current income is low and outside your control, so these need pairing with something else if the portfolio has to produce cash today.

What VTI vs QQQ actually do

A single fund holding effectively the entire investable US stock market, roughly 3,500 companies from mega-cap down to micro-cap.

It tracks the CRSP US Total Market Index at market-cap weights, so the largest 500 names still dominate the return and it behaves much like an S&P 500 fund in practice. The difference is the long tail of mid, small and micro-cap companies that an S&P 500 fund leaves out entirely. Over a full cycle that tail changes the risk profile more than it changes the headline return, and dividend yield sits slightly below a large-cap-only fund because smaller companies pay out less.

Suits an investor who wants one holding to cover US equity without deciding where the size cutoff should sit. Not an income vehicle, and it adds no geographic diversification.

Core holding

Invesco's fund tracking the Nasdaq-100, the largest non-financial companies listed on the Nasdaq exchange.

The index is modified market-cap weighted and excludes financials by rule, which is why it lands so heavily in technology, communication services and consumer discretionary names. In December 2025 the fund converted from a unit investment trust to a conventional open-end fund and cut its fee, so it can now reinvest income and lend securities like its peers. It remains the most liquid Nasdaq-100 vehicle by a wide margin and the reference asset for a large share of the options-income products in this category.

Suits investors who want concentrated large-cap growth exposure and anyone who needs deep options liquidity. Dividends are incidental, so it does not answer an income mandate on its own.

Growth-tilted core, concentrated

Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $17,219 in VTI and $19,698 in QQQ.
PeriodVTIQQQ
1 month0.69%-0.43%
3 months3.22%3.10%
Year to date13.43%17.09%
1 year15.24%17.78%
3 years87.48%105.61%
5 years72.19%96.98%
  • VTI
  • QQQ
61139216202120222023202420252026172197

Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
  • VTI
  • QQQ
0%15%29%44%59%Technology38.2%58.8%Communication Services9.1%12.1%Consumer Cyclical8.5%10.2%Healthcare9.9%4.4%Industrials8.5%5.5%Financial Services11.5%0.2%Consumer Defensive4.2%6.1%Energy3.6%0.5%Basic Materials2.1%1.0%Utilities1.9%1.1%Other2.4%0.2%
VTI vs QQQ holdings overlap
At least 45% overlap by weight, with 36 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
Largest shared holdingsVTI weightQQQ weight
NVDANVIDIA Corp7.13%8.17%
AAPLApple Inc6.63%7.82%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.19%6.19%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc3.30%4.42%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc2.76%3.15%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.28%2.49%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.18%3.28%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.18%2.94%
MUMicron Technology Inc1.64%4.41%
TSLATesla Inc1.36%3.02%
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.

VTI3598 holdings total

NameWeight
NVDANVIDIA Corp7.13%
AAPLApple Inc6.63%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.19%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc3.30%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc2.76%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.28%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.18%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.18%
MUMicron Technology Inc1.64%
TSLATesla Inc1.36%

QQQ102 holdings total

NameWeight
NVDANVIDIA Corp8.17%
AAPLApple Inc7.82%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp6.19%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc4.42%
MUMicron Technology Inc4.41%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc3.79%
METAMeta Platforms Inc3.28%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc3.15%
TSLATesla Inc3.02%
GOOGAlphabet Inc2.94%

Quick verdict

VTI fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. QQQ fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.

Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how VTI vs QQQ fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.

Frequently asked questions

Is VTI or QQQ better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. VTI currently yields 1.05% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while QQQ yields 0.53%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between VTI and QQQ?
Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF listed on NASDAQ. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, VTI or QQQ?
VTI has the lower expense ratio. VTI charges 0.03% a year and QQQ charges 0.18%, a difference of $15 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, VTI or QQQ?
Over the last 5 years, QQQ has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: VTI returned 72.2% and QQQ returned 97.0%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, VTI or QQQ?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, QQQ has been riskier: VTI fell as much as 25.4% and QQQ as much as 35.1%. Their betas are 1.02 and 1.23.
How much do VTI and QQQ overlap?
At least 45% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 36 shared holdings. The largest shared positions are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT. Holding both still adds meaningful diversification.
How often do VTI and QQQ pay dividends?
VTI pays quarterly and QQQ pays annual.
How much income does $10,000 in VTI vs QQQ generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in VTI would generate roughly $8.72 per month ($105 annually). The same amount in QQQ would produce about $4.40 per month ($53 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both VTI and QQQ?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare VTI vs QQQ with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how VTI and QQQ fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.

Related comparisons

For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.