Dividend comparison
QQQ vs SMH: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 and VanEck Semiconductor ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% a year versus 0.35% for SMH. On $10,000 that is $17 a year less in fees.
- Income. QQQ pays more income, yielding 0.53% over the last twelve months versus 0.20% for SMH. That is about $33 more a year on $10,000. Both pay annual.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, SMH returned 322.6% versus 97.0% for QQQ, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $42,258 in SMH and $19,698 in QQQ.
- Risk. SMH has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -45.3%, against -35.1% for QQQ.
- Diversification. QQQ holds 102 positions and SMH holds 26. The ten largest positions make up 47.2% of QQQ and 68.1% of SMH.
- Overlap. 31% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 21 shared holdings.
- Dividend growth. QQQ grew its yearly payout 13.3% a year over the last 4 years, versus 8.9% for SMH.
- Size. QQQ is the larger fund with $487.5 billion in assets, against $66.6 billion for SMH.
Bottom line: QQQ fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today, smaller drawdowns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. SMH fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns.
| Metric | QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 | SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 0.53% | 0.20% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $3.79 | $1.10 |
| Payout frequency | Annual | Annual |
| Last dividend | $0.7514 on Oct 8, 2026 | $1.1047 on Dec 26, 2025 |
| Ex-dividend date | Dec 21, 2026 | Dec 22, 2025 |
| Next payment | $0.7941 on Dec 28, 2026 | — |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 13.3% over 4 yrs | 8.9% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $717.63 | $546.36 |
| Dividend growth streak | — | 2 years |
| Beta | 1.23 | 1.98 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -35.1% | -45.3% |
| Market cap | $479.05B | $65.69B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.35% |
| Assets under management | $487.46B | $66.62B |
| Number of holdings | 102 | 26 |
| Top 10 concentration | 47.2% | 68.1% |
QQQ
$4.40/mo
$53 /yr at 0.53% yield
SMH
$1.68/mo
$20 /yr at 0.20% yield
| Year | QQQ | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.7949 | $1.1047 |
| 2024 | $3.0623 | $1.0713 |
| 2023 | $2.3200 | $1.0427 |
| 2022 | $2.1351 | $1.2005 |
| 2021 | $1.6968 | $0.7865 |
Current income is low and outside your control, so these need pairing with something else if the portfolio has to produce cash today.
What QQQ vs SMH actually do
The index is modified market-cap weighted and excludes financials by rule, which is why it lands so heavily in technology, communication services and consumer discretionary names. In December 2025 the fund converted from a unit investment trust to a conventional open-end fund and cut its fee, so it can now reinvest income and lend securities like its peers. It remains the most liquid Nasdaq-100 vehicle by a wide margin and the reference asset for a large share of the options-income products in this category.
Suits investors who want concentrated large-cap growth exposure and anyone who needs deep options liquidity. Dividends are incidental, so it does not answer an income mandate on its own.
Growth-tilted core, concentrated
| Period | QQQ | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.43% | -4.65% |
| 3 months | 3.10% | -2.23% |
| Year to date | 17.09% | 51.71% |
| 1 year | 17.78% | 57.84% |
| 3 years | 105.61% | 289.73% |
| 5 years | 96.98% | 322.58% |
- QQQ
- SMH
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- QQQ
- SMH
| Largest shared holdings | QQQ weight | SMH weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 8.17% | 20.42% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 4.41% | 4.63% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.79% | 5.43% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.49% | 5.49% |
| INTCIntel Corp | 2.08% | 4.09% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.47% | 4.07% |
| AMATApplied Materials Inc | 1.41% | 4.16% |
| TXNTexas Instruments Inc | 1.09% | 4.99% |
| KLACKLA Corp | 0.94% | 4.30% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 0.90% | 4.45% |
Quick verdict
QQQ fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today, smaller drawdowns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. SMH fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is QQQ or SMH better for dividend income?
What is the difference between QQQ and SMH?
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SMH?
Which has performed better, QQQ or SMH?
Which is riskier, QQQ or SMH?
How much do QQQ and SMH overlap?
How often do QQQ and SMH pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in QQQ vs SMH generate?
Can I hold both QQQ and SMH?
Where can I compare QQQ vs SMH with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.