Dividend comparison

FTEC vs SMH: Which Is Better?

Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF and VanEck Semiconductor ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.

FTEC vs SMH: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
  • Fees. FTEC is cheaper at 0.08% a year versus 0.35% for SMH. On $10,000 that is $27 a year less in fees.
  • Income. FTEC pays more income, yielding 0.39% over the last twelve months versus 0.20% for SMH. That is about $18 more a year on $10,000. FTEC pays quarterly, SMH pays annual.
  • Performance. Over the last 5 years, SMH returned 322.6% versus 134.1% for FTEC, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $42,258 in SMH and $23,410 in FTEC.
  • Risk. SMH has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -45.3%, against -35.0% for FTEC.
  • Diversification. FTEC holds 294 positions and SMH holds 26. The ten largest positions make up 64.5% of FTEC and 68.1% of SMH.
  • Overlap. 39% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 20 shared holdings.
  • Dividend growth. SMH grew its yearly payout 8.9% a year over the last 4 years, versus 3.0% for FTEC.
  • Size. SMH is the larger fund with $66.6 billion in assets, against $22.1 billion for FTEC.

Bottom line: FTEC fits better if you care most about lower fees, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. SMH fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth.

Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
MetricFTEC
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF
SMH
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Dividend yield (TTM)0.39%0.20%
Dividend / share (TTM)$1.11$1.10
Payout frequencyQuarterlyAnnual
Last dividend$0.3320 on Sep 22, 2026$1.1047 on Dec 26, 2025
Ex-dividend dateSep 18, 2026Dec 22, 2025
Dividend growth (CAGR)3.0% over 4 yrs8.9% over 4 yrs
Price$286.87$546.36
Dividend growth streak4 years2 years
Beta1.351.98
Max drawdown (5Y)-35.0%-45.3%
Market cap$17.10B$65.69B
ExchangeAMEXNASDAQ
Expense ratio0.08%0.35%
Assets under management$22.15B$66.62B
Number of holdings29426
Top 10 concentration64.5%68.1%
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.

FTEC

$3.22/mo

$39 /yr at 0.39% yield

SMH

$1.68/mo

$20 /yr at 0.20% yield

Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. FTEC pays quarterly; SMH pays annual.
YearFTECSMH
2025$0.9560$1.1047
2024$0.9050$1.0713
2023$1.1080$1.0427
2022$0.8760$1.2005
2021$0.8490$0.7865
Strategy: Sector and thematic
Funds that hold a single industry or theme, such as technology, semiconductors, healthcare or energy. Funds covering the same sector can still differ in concentration rules: some cap the largest positions while others let the biggest companies take a quarter of the fund. Sector funds are usually used to tilt a portfolio rather than as its core.

A single sector can fall far further than the broad market and stay down for years, and the largest names often dominate the fund.

Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $23,410 in FTEC and $42,258 in SMH.
PeriodFTECSMH
1 month-1.67%-4.65%
3 months6.20%-2.23%
Year to date27.69%51.71%
1 year26.49%57.84%
3 years138.24%289.73%
5 years134.10%322.58%
  • FTEC
  • SMH
35290546202120222023202420252026234423

Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
  • FTEC
  • SMH
0%25%50%75%100%Technology99.4%100.0%Communication Services0.4%Financial Services0.3%Industrials0.3%Energy0.3%Consumer Cyclical0.1%Cash & Others0.0%0.0%Basic Materials0.0%
FTEC vs SMH holdings overlap
39% overlap by weight, with 20 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
Largest shared holdingsFTEC weightSMH weight
NVDANVIDIA CORP17.47%20.42%
AVGOBROADCOM INC4.09%5.49%
MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC3.97%4.63%
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC3.40%5.43%
INTCINTEL CORP1.59%4.09%
LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORP1.35%4.07%
AMATAPPLIED MATERIALS INC1.30%4.16%
TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC1.01%4.99%
KLACKLA CORP0.88%4.30%
MRVLMARVELL TECHNOLOGY INC0.82%4.45%
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.

FTEC294 holdings total

NameWeight
NVDANVIDIA CORP17.47%
AAPLAPPLE INC17.14%
MSFTMICROSOFT CORP12.14%
AVGOBROADCOM INC4.09%
MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC3.97%
AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC3.40%
PLTRPALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC1.68%
CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INC1.66%
INTCINTEL CORP1.59%
LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORP1.35%

SMH26 holdings total

NameWeight
NVDANvidia Corp20.42%
TSMTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co L9.45%
AVGOBroadcom Inc5.49%
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc5.43%
TXNTexas Instruments Inc4.99%
MUMicron Technology Inc4.63%
ASMLAsml Holding Nv4.51%
ADIAnalog Devices Inc4.47%
MRVLMarvell Technology Inc4.45%
KLACKla Corp4.30%

Quick verdict

FTEC fits better if you care most about lower fees, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. SMH fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.

Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how FTEC vs SMH fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.

Frequently asked questions

Is FTEC or SMH better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. FTEC currently yields 0.39% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while SMH yields 0.20%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between FTEC and SMH?
Fidelity MSCI Information Technology Index ETF (FTEC) is an ETF listed on AMEX. VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is an ETF listed on NASDAQ. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, FTEC or SMH?
FTEC has the lower expense ratio. FTEC charges 0.08% a year and SMH charges 0.35%, a difference of $27 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, FTEC or SMH?
Over the last 5 years, SMH has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: FTEC returned 134.1% and SMH returned 322.6%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, FTEC or SMH?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, SMH has been riskier: FTEC fell as much as 35.0% and SMH as much as 45.3%. Their betas are 1.35 and 1.98.
How much do FTEC and SMH overlap?
About 39% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 20 shared holdings. The largest shared positions are NVDA, AVGO, MU. Holding both still adds meaningful diversification.
How often do FTEC and SMH pay dividends?
FTEC pays quarterly and SMH pays annual.
How much income does $10,000 in FTEC vs SMH generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in FTEC would generate roughly $3.22 per month ($39 annually). The same amount in SMH would produce about $1.68 per month ($20 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both FTEC and SMH?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare FTEC vs SMH with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how FTEC and SMH fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.

Related comparisons

For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.