Dividend comparison

VT vs SCHG: Which Is Better?

Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard Total World Stock ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.

Start freeOpen interactive compareSee pricing
VT vs SCHG: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
  • Fees. SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% a year versus 0.06% for VT. On $10,000 that is $2 a year less in fees.
  • Income. VT pays more income, yielding 1.53% over the last twelve months versus 0.39% for SCHG. That is about $114 more a year on $10,000. VT pays annual, SCHG pays quarterly.
  • Performance. Over the last 5 years, SCHG returned 85.2% versus 60.7% for VT, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $18,525 in SCHG and $16,069 in VT.
  • Risk. SCHG has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -34.6%, against -26.4% for VT.
  • Diversification. VT holds 9,773 positions and SCHG holds 189. The ten largest positions make up 22.3% of VT and 60.9% of SCHG.
  • Overlap. At least 29% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 34 shared holdings.
  • Dividend growth. SCHG grew its yearly payout 9.4% a year over the last 4 years, versus 7.1% for VT.

Bottom line: VT fits better if you care most about more income today, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. SCHG fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth.

Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
MetricVT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Dividend yield (TTM)1.53%0.39%
Dividend / share (TTM)$2.41$0.14
Payout frequencyAnnualQuarterly
Last dividend$0.4084 on Sep 22, 2026$0.0371 on Sep 28, 2026
Ex-dividend dateSep 18, 2026Sep 23, 2026
Dividend growth (CAGR)7.1% over 4 yrs9.4% over 4 yrs
Price$157.80$35.53
Dividend growth streak—4 years
Beta0.931.20
Max drawdown (5Y)-26.4%-34.6%
Market cap$101.30B$63.06B
ExchangeAMEXAMEX
Expense ratio0.06%0.04%
Assets under management$101.20B$63.70B
Number of holdings9773189
Top 10 concentration22.3%60.9%
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.

VT

$12.75/mo

$153 /yr at 1.53% yield

SCHG

$3.26/mo

$39 /yr at 0.39% yield

Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. VT pays annual; SCHG pays quarterly.
YearVTSCHG
2025$2.5732$0.1168
2024$2.2939$0.1163
2023$2.1419$0.0903
2022$1.8957$0.0817
2021$1.9550$0.0817
Strategy: Broad index
Low-cost funds that hold an entire market or index at market-cap weights and make no attempt to select securities. Return is the index return less a small fee, and dividends are a by-product of what the underlying companies choose to pay rather than an objective of the strategy. Differences between funds tracking the same index usually come down to fee, wrapper structure, share price and trading liquidity, not to holdings.

Current income is low and outside your control, so these need pairing with something else if the portfolio has to produce cash today.

What VT vs SCHG actually do

VT
One fund holding the whole global stock market, around ten thousand companies across developed and emerging markets including the US.

It tracks the FTSE Global All Cap Index at market-cap weights, so US companies make up the majority of the fund simply because they are the majority of world market value, with the remainder spread across developed international and emerging markets. Weights shift as those markets grow or shrink relative to each other, so the allocation decision is made by the market rather than by you. Holding non-US companies brings currency exposure and foreign withholding tax, and the headline yield is usually a little higher than a US-only fund because many international companies pay out more of their earnings.

Suits an investor who wants a single, permanently self-rebalancing global equity holding and no home-country judgment call. Not for someone who wants to control their US weighting deliberately, and not an income fund.

Core holding, global

Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $16,069 in VT and $18,525 in SCHG.
PeriodVTSCHG
1 month-0.47%0.40%
3 months1.95%4.16%
Year to date11.87%9.29%
1 year13.16%10.38%
3 years80.78%99.05%
5 years60.69%85.25%
  • VT
  • SCHG
62130199202120222023202420252026161185

Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
  • VT
  • SCHG
0%14%27%41%54%Technology31.9%54.3%Communication Services7.2%13.7%Financial Services15.6%5.0%Consumer Cyclical8.1%10.1%Industrials10.5%7.0%Healthcare8.5%6.6%Consumer Defensive4.3%1.1%Basic Materials4.1%0.9%Energy3.9%0.7%Utilities2.2%0.4%Other3.7%0.3%
VT vs SCHG holdings overlap
At least 29% overlap by weight, with 34 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
Largest shared holdingsVT weightSCHG weight
NVDANVIDIA Corp4.52%12.13%
AAPLApple Inc4.08%11.73%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.23%9.19%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc2.05%5.74%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc1.72%4.68%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.39%4.00%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.35%4.25%
GOOGAlphabet Inc1.35%3.75%
MUMicron Technology Inc1.02%2.69%
TSLATesla Inc0.88%2.71%
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.

VT9773 holdings total

NameWeight
NVDANVIDIA Corp4.52%
AAPLApple Inc4.08%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.23%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc2.05%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc1.72%
2330.TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd1.62%
AVGOBroadcom Inc1.39%
METAMeta Platforms Inc1.35%
GOOGAlphabet Inc1.35%
MUMicron Technology Inc1.02%

SCHG189 holdings total

NameWeight
NVDANVIDIA12.13%
AAPLAPPLE11.73%
MSFTMICROSOFT9.19%
AMZNAMAZON COM INC5.74%
GOOGLALPHABET CLASS A4.68%
METAMETA PLATFORMS CLASS A4.25%
AVGOBROADCOM INC4.00%
GOOGALPHABET CLASS C3.75%
LLYELI LILLY2.73%
TSLATESLA INC2.71%

Quick verdict

VT fits better if you care most about more income today, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. SCHG fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.

Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how VT vs SCHG fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.
Start freeInteractive DRIP compare

Frequently asked questions

Is VT or SCHG better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. VT currently yields 1.53% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while SCHG yields 0.39%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between VT and SCHG?
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, VT or SCHG?
SCHG has the lower expense ratio. VT charges 0.06% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, a difference of $2 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, VT or SCHG?
Over the last 5 years, SCHG has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: VT returned 60.7% and SCHG returned 85.2%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, VT or SCHG?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, SCHG has been riskier: VT fell as much as 26.4% and SCHG as much as 34.6%. Their betas are 0.93 and 1.20.
How much do VT and SCHG overlap?
At least 29% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 34 shared holdings. The largest shared positions are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT. Holding both still adds meaningful diversification.
How often do VT and SCHG pay dividends?
VT pays annual and SCHG pays quarterly.
How much income does $10,000 in VT vs SCHG generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in VT would generate roughly $12.75 per month ($153 annually). The same amount in SCHG would produce about $3.26 per month ($39 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both VT and SCHG?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare VT vs SCHG with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how VT and SCHG fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.

Related comparisons

For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.