Dividend comparison
VIG vs NOBL: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF and ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. VIG is cheaper at 0.04% a year versus 0.35% for NOBL. On $10,000 that is $31 a year less in fees.
- Income. NOBL pays more income, yielding 2.04% over the last twelve months versus 1.50% for VIG. That is about $54 more a year on $10,000. Both pay quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, VIG returned 61.4% versus 36.7% for NOBL, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $16,136 in VIG and $13,672 in NOBL.
- Risk. VIG has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -20.4%, against -17.9% for NOBL.
- Diversification. VIG holds 338 positions and NOBL holds 71. The ten largest positions make up 34.9% of VIG and 16.8% of NOBL.
- Overlap. 22% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 32 shared holdings.
- Dividend growth. VIG grew its yearly payout 7.5% a year over the last 4 years, versus 4.6% for NOBL.
- Size. VIG is the larger fund with $127.7 billion in assets, against $11.4 billion for NOBL.
Bottom line: VIG fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. NOBL fits better if you care most about more income today.
| Metric | VIG Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | NOBL ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 1.50% | 2.04% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $3.65 | $1.17 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.9295 on Sep 30, 2026 | $0.2825 on Sep 29, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 28, 2026 | Sep 23, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 7.5% over 4 yrs | 4.6% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $243.07 | $57.49 |
| Dividend growth streak | 12 years | 3 years |
| Beta | 0.82 | 0.62 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -20.4% | -17.9% |
| Market cap | $127.69B | $11.51B |
| Exchange | AMEX | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.35% |
| Assets under management | $127.70B | $11.44B |
| Number of holdings | 338 | 71 |
| Top 10 concentration | 34.9% | 16.8% |
VIG
$12.50/mo
$150 /yr at 1.50% yield
NOBL
$17.00/mo
$204 /yr at 2.04% yield
| Year | VIG | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.5580 | $1.1127 |
| 2024 | $3.3791 | $1.0226 |
| 2023 | $3.2081 | $0.9969 |
| 2022 | $2.9725 | $0.8720 |
| 2021 | $2.6601 | $0.9301 |
Expect stretches of underperformance versus the broad market whenever leadership comes from the high-growth, low-yield companies these screens exclude.
What VIG vs NOBL actually do
It tracks the S&P U.S. Dividend Growers Index, which requires a decade of unbroken annual increases and then removes the top 25% of eligible names by yield. Screening out the highest payers is intentional: an unusually high yield often signals a stretched payout or a falling share price, and the index is built for durability rather than for current income. The result is a lower starting yield than most dividend funds and a portfolio that leans toward large, stable, profitable companies.
Suits a long-horizon investor who cares more about the dividend rising every year than about the size of the first payment. Not appropriate if you need meaningful cash flow from the position today.
Dividend growth, quality tilt
| Period | VIG | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 2.56% | 3.81% |
| 3 months | 2.30% | 2.19% |
| Year to date | 10.60% | 12.20% |
| 1 year | 11.88% | 14.09% |
| 3 years | 64.31% | 42.58% |
| 5 years | 61.36% | 36.72% |
- VIG
- NOBL
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- VIG
- NOBL
| Largest shared holdings | VIG weight | NOBL weight |
|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corp | 2.96% | 1.66% |
| ABBVAbbVie Inc | 2.05% | 1.60% |
| WMTWalmart Inc | 2.05% | 1.56% |
| PGProcter & Gamble Co/The | 1.50% | 1.52% |
| KOCoca-Cola Co/The | 1.48% | 1.63% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson | 2.83% | 1.42% |
| CATCaterpillar Inc | 1.65% | 1.17% |
| LINLinde PLC | 0.97% | 1.42% |
| IBMInternational Business Machines Corp | 0.92% | 1.65% |
| PEPPepsiCo Inc | 0.77% | 1.41% |
VIG338 holdings total
NOBL71 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| BDXBECTON DICKINSON AND CO | 1.79% |
| FDSFACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC | 1.77% |
| ADPAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING | 1.69% |
| CVXCHEVRON CORP | 1.67% |
| XOMEXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 1.66% |
| EMREMERSON ELECTRIC CO | 1.65% |
| ERIEERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A | 1.65% |
| IBMINTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 1.65% |
| CAHCARDINAL HEALTH INC | 1.64% |
| ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.63% |
Quick verdict
VIG fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. NOBL fits better if you care most about more income today. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is VIG or NOBL better for dividend income?
What is the difference between VIG and NOBL?
Which is cheaper, VIG or NOBL?
Which has performed better, VIG or NOBL?
Which is riskier, VIG or NOBL?
How much do VIG and NOBL overlap?
How often do VIG and NOBL pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in VIG vs NOBL generate?
Can I hold both VIG and NOBL?
Where can I compare VIG vs NOBL with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.