Dividend comparison
SPHD vs NOBL: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF and ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% a year versus 0.35% for NOBL. On $10,000 that is $5 a year less in fees.
- Income. SPHD pays more income, yielding 4.87% over the last twelve months versus 2.04% for NOBL. That is about $283 more a year on $10,000. SPHD pays monthly, NOBL pays quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, NOBL returned 36.7% versus 35.9% for SPHD, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $13,672 in NOBL and $13,591 in SPHD.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 5 years were similar: -19.5% for SPHD and -17.9% for NOBL from peak to trough.
- Diversification. NOBL holds 71 positions and SPHD holds 54. The ten largest positions make up 28.8% of SPHD and 16.8% of NOBL.
- Overlap. 20% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 14 shared holdings. They mostly own different companies, so they can complement each other.
- Dividend growth. SPHD grew its yearly payout 5.4% a year over the last 4 years, versus 4.6% for NOBL.
- Size. NOBL is the larger fund with $11.4 billion in assets, against $3.3 billion for SPHD.
Bottom line: SPHD has the edge on these figures, with lower fees and more income today. NOBL does not lead on any of the measures compared here.
| Metric | SPHD Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | NOBL ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 4.87% | 2.04% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $2.47 | $1.17 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.2016 on Sep 25, 2026 | $0.2825 on Sep 29, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 19, 2026 | Sep 23, 2026 |
| Next payment | $0.2010 on Oct 23, 2026 | — |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 5.4% over 4 yrs | 4.6% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $50.64 | $57.49 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | 3 years |
| Beta | 0.47 | 0.62 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -19.5% | -17.9% |
| Market cap | $3.29B | $11.51B |
| Exchange | AMEX | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.35% |
| Assets under management | $3.26B | $11.44B |
| Number of holdings | 54 | 71 |
| Top 10 concentration | 28.8% | 16.8% |
SPHD
$40.59/mo
$487 /yr at 4.87% yield
NOBL
$17.00/mo
$204 /yr at 2.04% yield
| Year | SPHD | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.9308 | $1.1127 |
| 2024 | $1.6464 | $1.0226 |
| 2023 | $1.9010 | $0.9969 |
| 2022 | $1.7038 | $0.8720 |
| 2021 | $1.5643 | $0.9301 |
Expect stretches of underperformance versus the broad market whenever leadership comes from the high-growth, low-yield companies these screens exclude.
| Period | SPHD | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 1.22% | 3.81% |
| 3 months | -4.22% | 2.19% |
| Year to date | 5.50% | 12.20% |
| 1 year | 4.33% | 14.09% |
| 3 years | 44.23% | 42.58% |
| 5 years | 35.91% | 36.72% |
- SPHD
- NOBL
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- SPHD
- NOBL
| Largest shared holdings | SPHD weight | NOBL weight |
|---|---|---|
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.33% | 1.67% |
| XOMExxonMobil Holdings Corp | 1.64% | 1.66% |
| MDTMedtronic PLC | 1.96% | 1.62% |
| GPCGenuine Parts Co | 1.82% | 1.55% |
| SJMJ M Smucker Co/The | 2.00% | 1.54% |
| AMCRAmcor PLC | 2.75% | 1.46% |
| PEPPepsiCo Inc | 1.99% | 1.41% |
| KMBKimberly-Clark Corp | 2.13% | 1.39% |
| BENFranklin Templeton Inc | 1.78% | 1.36% |
| CLXClorox Co/The | 2.21% | 1.28% |
SPHD54 holdings total
NOBL71 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| BDXBECTON DICKINSON AND CO | 1.79% |
| FDSFACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC | 1.77% |
| ADPAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING | 1.69% |
| CVXCHEVRON CORP | 1.67% |
| XOMEXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 1.66% |
| EMREMERSON ELECTRIC CO | 1.65% |
| ERIEERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A | 1.65% |
| IBMINTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 1.65% |
| CAHCARDINAL HEALTH INC | 1.64% |
| ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.63% |
Quick verdict
SPHD has the edge on these figures, with lower fees and more income today. NOBL does not lead on any of the measures compared here. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is SPHD or NOBL better for dividend income?
What is the difference between SPHD and NOBL?
Which is cheaper, SPHD or NOBL?
Which has performed better, SPHD or NOBL?
Which is riskier, SPHD or NOBL?
How much do SPHD and NOBL overlap?
How often do SPHD and NOBL pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in SPHD vs NOBL generate?
Can I hold both SPHD and NOBL?
Where can I compare SPHD vs NOBL with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.