Dividend comparison
VGLT vs LQD: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. VGLT is cheaper at 0.03% a year versus 0.14% for LQD. On $10,000 that is $11 a year less in fees.
- Income. Their trailing yields are almost the same: 4.91% for VGLT and 4.89% for LQD. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, LQD returned -8.0% versus -31.4% for VGLT, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $9,203 in LQD and $6,855 in VGLT.
- Risk. VGLT has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -41.0%, against -24.5% for LQD.
- Diversification. LQD holds 3,181 positions and VGLT holds 69.
- Dividend growth. LQD grew its yearly payout 12.9% a year over the last 4 years, versus 11.1% for VGLT.
Bottom line: VGLT fits better if you care most about lower fees. LQD fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification.
| Metric | VGLT Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF | LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 4.91% | 4.89% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $2.52 | $5.05 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.2052 on Oct 5, 2026 | $0.4387 on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 11.1% over 4 yrs | 12.9% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $51.42 | $103.22 |
| Dividend growth streak | 4 years | 4 years |
| Beta | 2.25 | 1.34 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -41.0% | -24.5% |
| Market cap | $14.91B | $28.79B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.14% |
| Assets under management | $14.90B | $28.78B |
| Number of holdings | 69 | 3181 |
VGLT
$40.92/mo
$491 /yr at 4.91% yield
LQD
$40.76/mo
$489 /yr at 4.89% yield
| Year | VGLT | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.4791 | $4.9377 |
| 2024 | $2.3963 | $4.7508 |
| 2023 | $2.0484 | $4.4203 |
| 2022 | $1.7471 | $3.4793 |
| 2021 | $1.6269 | $3.0444 |
Bond prices fall when interest rates rise, and long-duration funds can lose as much as stocks in a fast rate-hiking cycle.
| Period | VGLT | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -1.25% | -1.41% |
| 3 months | -4.95% | -4.03% |
| Year to date | -7.85% | -6.33% |
| 1 year | -10.84% | -7.61% |
| 3 years | 7.48% | 15.14% |
| 5 years | -31.45% | -7.97% |
- VGLT
- LQD
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- VGLT
- LQD
Quick verdict
VGLT fits better if you care most about lower fees. LQD fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is VGLT or LQD better for dividend income?
What is the difference between VGLT and LQD?
Which is cheaper, VGLT or LQD?
Which has performed better, VGLT or LQD?
Which is riskier, VGLT or LQD?
How often do VGLT and LQD pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in VGLT vs LQD generate?
Can I hold both VGLT and LQD?
Where can I compare VGLT vs LQD with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.