Dividend comparison
TLT vs LQD: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. LQD is cheaper at 0.14% a year versus 0.15% for TLT. On $10,000 that is $1 a year less in fees.
- Income. Their trailing yields are almost the same: 4.86% for TLT and 4.89% for LQD. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, LQD returned -8.0% versus -35.4% for TLT, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $9,203 in LQD and $6,462 in TLT.
- Risk. TLT has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -43.7%, against -24.5% for LQD.
- Diversification. LQD holds 3,181 positions and TLT holds 47.
- Dividend growth. TLT grew its yearly payout 14.9% a year over the last 4 years, versus 12.9% for LQD.
Bottom line: TLT fits better if you care most about faster dividend growth. LQD fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification.
| Metric | TLT iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF | LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 4.86% | 4.89% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $3.89 | $5.05 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.3116 on Oct 6, 2026 | $0.4387 on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 14.9% over 4 yrs | 12.9% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $80.13 | $103.22 |
| Dividend growth streak | 4 years | 4 years |
| Beta | 2.40 | 1.34 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -43.7% | -24.5% |
| Market cap | $40.47B | $28.79B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.14% |
| Assets under management | $46.45B | $28.78B |
| Number of holdings | 47 | 3181 |
TLT
$40.47/mo
$486 /yr at 4.86% yield
LQD
$40.76/mo
$489 /yr at 4.89% yield
| Year | TLT | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.8607 | $4.9377 |
| 2024 | $3.7549 | $4.7508 |
| 2023 | $3.3424 | $4.4203 |
| 2022 | $2.6563 | $3.4793 |
| 2021 | $2.2165 | $3.0444 |
Bond prices fall when interest rates rise, and long-duration funds can lose as much as stocks in a fast rate-hiking cycle.
| Period | TLT | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -1.38% | -1.41% |
| 3 months | -5.19% | -4.03% |
| Year to date | -8.07% | -6.33% |
| 1 year | -11.85% | -7.61% |
| 3 years | 5.30% | 15.14% |
| 5 years | -35.38% | -7.97% |
- TLT
- LQD
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- TLT
- LQD
Quick verdict
TLT fits better if you care most about faster dividend growth. LQD fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is TLT or LQD better for dividend income?
What is the difference between TLT and LQD?
Which is cheaper, TLT or LQD?
Which has performed better, TLT or LQD?
Which is riskier, TLT or LQD?
How often do TLT and LQD pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in TLT vs LQD generate?
Can I hold both TLT and LQD?
Where can I compare TLT vs LQD with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.