Dividend comparison
AGG vs LQD: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. AGG is cheaper at 0.03% a year versus 0.14% for LQD. On $10,000 that is $11 a year less in fees.
- Income. LQD pays more income, yielding 4.89% over the last twelve months versus 4.16% for AGG. That is about $73 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, AGG returned -4.8% versus -8.0% for LQD, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $9,524 in AGG and $9,203 in LQD.
- Risk. LQD has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -24.5%, against -17.3% for AGG.
- Diversification. AGG holds 13,433 positions and LQD holds 3,181.
- Dividend growth. AGG grew its yearly payout 17.8% a year over the last 4 years, versus 12.9% for LQD.
- Size. AGG is the larger fund with $138.4 billion in assets, against $28.8 billion for LQD.
Bottom line: AGG fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. LQD fits better if you care most about more income today.
| Metric | AGG iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 4.16% | 4.89% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $3.97 | $5.05 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.3341 on Oct 6, 2026 | $0.4387 on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 17.8% over 4 yrs | 12.9% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $95.27 | $103.22 |
| Dividend growth streak | 4 years | 4 years |
| Beta | 0.99 | 1.34 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -17.3% | -24.5% |
| Market cap | $138.48B | $28.79B |
| Exchange | AMEX | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.14% |
| Assets under management | $138.40B | $28.78B |
| Number of holdings | 13433 | 3181 |
AGG
$34.69/mo
$416 /yr at 4.16% yield
LQD
$40.76/mo
$489 /yr at 4.89% yield
| Year | AGG | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.8850 | $4.9377 |
| 2024 | $3.6283 | $4.7508 |
| 2023 | $3.1076 | $4.4203 |
| 2022 | $2.3187 | $3.4793 |
| 2021 | $2.0204 | $3.0444 |
Bond prices fall when interest rates rise, and long-duration funds can lose as much as stocks in a fast rate-hiking cycle.
| Period | AGG | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.72% | -1.41% |
| 3 months | -2.98% | -4.03% |
| Year to date | -4.62% | -6.33% |
| 1 year | -5.19% | -7.61% |
| 3 years | 12.36% | 15.14% |
| 5 years | -4.76% | -7.97% |
- AGG
- LQD
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- AGG
- LQD
Quick verdict
AGG fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. LQD fits better if you care most about more income today. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is AGG or LQD better for dividend income?
What is the difference between AGG and LQD?
Which is cheaper, AGG or LQD?
Which has performed better, AGG or LQD?
Which is riskier, AGG or LQD?
How often do AGG and LQD pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in AGG vs LQD generate?
Can I hold both AGG and LQD?
Where can I compare AGG vs LQD with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.