Dividend comparison
NOBL vs RDVY: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
NOBL vs RDVY: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
- Fees. NOBL is cheaper at 0.35% a year versus 0.47% for RDVY. On $10,000 that is $12 a year less in fees.
- Income. NOBL pays more income, yielding 2.04% over the last twelve months versus 0.85% for RDVY. That is about $119 more a year on $10,000. Both pay quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, RDVY returned 69.8% versus 36.7% for NOBL, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $16,979 in RDVY and $13,672 in NOBL.
- Risk. RDVY has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -25.3%, against -17.9% for NOBL.
- Diversification. RDVY holds 72 positions and NOBL holds 71. The ten largest positions make up 16.8% of NOBL and 22.1% of RDVY.
- Overlap. 7% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 6 shared holdings. They mostly own different companies, so they can complement each other.
- Dividend growth. RDVY grew its yearly payout 9.4% a year over the last 4 years, versus 4.6% for NOBL.
- Size. RDVY is the larger fund with $25.4 billion in assets, against $11.4 billion for NOBL.
Bottom line: NOBL fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today and smaller drawdowns. RDVY fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth.
Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
| Metric | NOBL ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 2.04% | 0.85% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $1.17 | $0.68 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.2825 on Sep 29, 2026 | $0.1521 on Sep 30, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 23, 2026 | Sep 24, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 4.6% over 4 yrs | 9.4% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $57.49 | $79.63 |
| Dividend growth streak | 3 years | — |
| Beta | 0.62 | 0.94 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -17.9% | -25.3% |
| Market cap | $11.51B | $25.45B |
| Exchange | CBOE | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.47% |
| Assets under management | $11.44B | $25.45B |
| Number of holdings | 71 | 72 |
| Top 10 concentration | 16.8% | 22.1% |
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.
NOBL
$17.00/mo
$204 /yr at 2.04% yield
RDVY
$7.12/mo
$85 /yr at 0.85% yield
Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. NOBL pays quarterly; RDVY pays quarterly.
| Year | NOBL | RDVY |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.1127 | $0.7733 |
| 2024 | $1.0226 | $0.9722 |
| 2023 | $0.9969 | $1.0797 |
| 2022 | $0.8720 | $0.9700 |
| 2021 | $0.9301 | $0.5390 |
Strategy: Dividend equity
Rules-based equity funds that screen for companies paying sustainable or rising dividends, aiming at income plus long-term share-price participation. The screen is what defines the fund: yield-ranked indexes deliver more cash now, dividend-growth indexes deliberately exclude the highest payers in favor of durability. Both approaches produce a sector mix that looks nothing like the broad market, typically heavier in financials, healthcare, staples and industrials.
Expect stretches of underperformance versus the broad market whenever leadership comes from the high-growth, low-yield companies these screens exclude.
Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $13,672 in NOBL and $16,979 in RDVY.
| Period | NOBL | RDVY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 3.81% | 0.40% |
| 3 months | 2.19% | -0.46% |
| Year to date | 12.20% | 14.63% |
| 1 year | 14.09% | 18.85% |
| 3 years | 42.58% | 86.40% |
| 5 years | 36.72% | 69.79% |
- NOBL
- RDVY
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
- NOBL
- RDVY
NOBL vs RDVY holdings overlap
7% overlap by weight, with 6 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.
NOBL71 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| BDXBECTON DICKINSON AND CO | 1.79% |
| FDSFACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC | 1.77% |
| ADPAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING | 1.69% |
| CVXCHEVRON CORP | 1.67% |
| XOMEXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 1.66% |
| EMREMERSON ELECTRIC CO | 1.65% |
| ERIEERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A | 1.65% |
| IBMINTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 1.65% |
| CAHCARDINAL HEALTH INC | 1.64% |
| ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.63% |
RDVY72 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| TRVThe Travelers Companies, Inc. | 2.37% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 2.28% |
| VVisa Inc. (Class A) | 2.26% |
| EXPEExpedia Group, Inc. | 2.21% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corporation | 2.20% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) | 2.17% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 2.15% |
| GEVGE Vernova Inc. | 2.15% |
| ACNAccenture plc | 2.14% |
| ALLThe Allstate Corporation | 2.13% |
Quick verdict
NOBL fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today and smaller drawdowns. RDVY fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how NOBL vs RDVY fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.
Frequently asked questions
Is NOBL or RDVY better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. NOBL currently yields 2.04% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while RDVY yields 0.85%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between NOBL and RDVY?
ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL) is an ETF listed on CBOE. First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) is an ETF listed on NASDAQ. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, NOBL or RDVY?
NOBL has the lower expense ratio. NOBL charges 0.35% a year and RDVY charges 0.47%, a difference of $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, NOBL or RDVY?
Over the last 5 years, RDVY has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: NOBL returned 36.7% and RDVY returned 69.8%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, NOBL or RDVY?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, RDVY has been riskier: NOBL fell as much as 17.9% and RDVY as much as 25.3%. Their betas are 0.62 and 0.94.
How much do NOBL and RDVY overlap?
About 7% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 6 shared holdings. The largest shared positions are ADP, CB, AFL. Holding both still adds meaningful diversification.
How often do NOBL and RDVY pay dividends?
Both pay quarterly. The most recent payments were $0.2825 for NOBL and $0.1521 for RDVY.
How much income does $10,000 in NOBL vs RDVY generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in NOBL would generate roughly $17.00 per month ($204 annually). The same amount in RDVY would produce about $7.12 per month ($85 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both NOBL and RDVY?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare NOBL vs RDVY with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how NOBL and RDVY fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.