Dividend comparison
MTUM vs QUAL: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. Both charge about 0.15% a year, so cost is not what separates them.
- Income. QUAL pays more income, yielding 0.84% over the last twelve months versus 0.63% for MTUM. That is about $21 more a year on $10,000. Both pay quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, QUAL returned 71.5% versus 68.0% for MTUM, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $17,151 in QUAL and $16,798 in MTUM.
- Risk. MTUM has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -32.3%, against -28.2% for QUAL.
- Diversification. MTUM holds 125 positions and QUAL holds 118. The ten largest positions make up 37.1% of MTUM and 45.1% of QUAL.
- Overlap. 23% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 25 shared holdings.
- Dividend growth. MTUM grew its yearly payout 22.9% a year over the last 4 years, versus 1.6% for QUAL.
- Size. QUAL is the larger fund with $48.6 billion in assets, against $18.7 billion for MTUM.
Bottom line: MTUM fits better if you care most about faster dividend growth. QUAL fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns.
| Metric | MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | QUAL iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 0.63% | 0.84% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $1.85 | $1.89 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.6035 on Sep 18, 2026 | $0.4727 on Sep 18, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 15, 2026 | Sep 15, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 22.9% over 4 yrs | 1.6% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $295.84 | $225.69 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | 2 years |
| Beta | 1.24 | 0.90 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -32.3% | -28.2% |
| Market cap | $28.22B | $48.40B |
| Exchange | CBOE | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Assets under management | $18.75B | $48.61B |
| Number of holdings | 125 | 118 |
| Top 10 concentration | 37.1% | 45.1% |
MTUM
$5.22/mo
$63 /yr at 0.63% yield
QUAL
$6.98/mo
$84 /yr at 0.84% yield
| Year | MTUM | QUAL |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.2726 | $1.8588 |
| 2024 | $1.5482 | $1.9073 |
| 2023 | $2.1122 | $1.7090 |
| 2022 | $2.6197 | $1.8144 |
| 2021 | $0.9971 | $1.7441 |
Factor tilts go through long dry spells, and momentum funds can turn over quickly and get caught out when market leadership changes.
| Period | MTUM | QUAL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -4.45% | 2.97% |
| 3 months | -2.05% | 4.25% |
| Year to date | 18.66% | 14.32% |
| 1 year | 17.16% | 16.43% |
| 3 years | 119.37% | 76.89% |
| 5 years | 67.98% | 71.51% |
- MTUM
- QUAL
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- MTUM
- QUAL
| Largest shared holdings | MTUM weight | QUAL weight |
|---|---|---|
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIAL INC | 2.68% | 2.47% |
| XOMEXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 2.97% | 2.45% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH | 2.16% | 3.18% |
| JNJJOHNSON & JOHNSON | 3.30% | 2.00% |
| GOOGLALPHABET CLASS A | 2.85% | 1.94% |
| GOOGALPHABET CLASS C | 2.25% | 1.52% |
| MRKMERCK & CO INC | 1.86% | 1.35% |
| KLACKLA | 1.14% | 2.20% |
| WMTWALMART INC | 2.45% | 1.03% |
| FTNTFORTINET | 0.99% | 1.20% |
MTUM125 holdings total
Quick verdict
MTUM fits better if you care most about faster dividend growth. QUAL fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is MTUM or QUAL better for dividend income?
What is the difference between MTUM and QUAL?
Which is cheaper, MTUM or QUAL?
Which has performed better, MTUM or QUAL?
Which is riskier, MTUM or QUAL?
How much do MTUM and QUAL overlap?
How often do MTUM and QUAL pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in MTUM vs QUAL generate?
Can I hold both MTUM and QUAL?
Where can I compare MTUM vs QUAL with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.