Dividend comparison
MTUM vs FDMO: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. Both charge about 0.15% a year, so cost is not what separates them.
- Income. Their trailing yields are almost the same: 0.63% for MTUM and 0.63% for FDMO. Both pay quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, FDMO returned 86.2% versus 68.0% for MTUM, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $18,623 in FDMO and $16,798 in MTUM.
- Risk. MTUM has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -32.3%, against -25.4% for FDMO.
- Diversification. FDMO holds 130 positions and MTUM holds 125. The ten largest positions make up 37.1% of MTUM and 40.8% of FDMO.
- Overlap. 43% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 48 shared holdings.
- Dividend growth. MTUM grew its yearly payout 22.9% a year over the last 4 years, versus 12.6% for FDMO.
- Size. MTUM is the larger fund with $18.7 billion in assets, against $870 million for FDMO.
Bottom line: MTUM fits better if you care most about faster dividend growth. FDMO fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns.
| Metric | MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | FDMO Fidelity Momentum Factor ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 0.63% | 0.63% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $1.85 | $0.59 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.6035 on Sep 18, 2026 | $0.1660 on Sep 22, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 15, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 22.9% over 4 yrs | 12.6% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $295.84 | $92.65 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | 2 years |
| Beta | 1.24 | 1.06 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -32.3% | -25.4% |
| Market cap | $28.22B | $853.8M |
| Exchange | CBOE | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.15% |
| Assets under management | $18.75B | $870.0M |
| Number of holdings | 125 | 130 |
| Top 10 concentration | 37.1% | 40.8% |
MTUM
$5.22/mo
$63 /yr at 0.63% yield
FDMO
$5.27/mo
$63 /yr at 0.63% yield
| Year | MTUM | FDMO |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.2726 | $0.5140 |
| 2024 | $1.5482 | $0.6360 |
| 2023 | $2.1122 | $0.4470 |
| 2022 | $2.6197 | $0.5080 |
| 2021 | $0.9971 | $0.3200 |
Factor tilts go through long dry spells, and momentum funds can turn over quickly and get caught out when market leadership changes.
| Period | MTUM | FDMO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -4.45% | -1.94% |
| 3 months | -2.05% | -0.33% |
| Year to date | 18.66% | 10.35% |
| 1 year | 17.16% | 11.51% |
| 3 years | 119.37% | 105.71% |
| 5 years | 67.98% | 86.23% |
- MTUM
- FDMO
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- MTUM
- FDMO
| Largest shared holdings | MTUM weight | FDMO weight |
|---|---|---|
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 4.47% | 3.18% |
| GOOGLALPHABET CLASS A | 2.85% | 5.65% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY | 4.94% | 2.62% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 5.90% | 2.50% |
| INTCINTEL CORPORATION | 3.90% | 1.67% |
| SNDKSANDISK | 2.57% | 1.53% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH | 2.16% | 1.50% |
| DELLDELL TECHNOLOGIES INC CLASS C | 1.74% | 1.38% |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIAL INC | 2.68% | 1.36% |
| JNJJOHNSON & JOHNSON | 3.30% | 1.35% |
MTUM125 holdings total
Quick verdict
MTUM fits better if you care most about faster dividend growth. FDMO fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is MTUM or FDMO better for dividend income?
What is the difference between MTUM and FDMO?
Which is cheaper, MTUM or FDMO?
Which has performed better, MTUM or FDMO?
Which is riskier, MTUM or FDMO?
How much do MTUM and FDMO overlap?
How often do MTUM and FDMO pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in MTUM vs FDMO generate?
Can I hold both MTUM and FDMO?
Where can I compare MTUM vs FDMO with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.