Dividend comparison
MTUM vs SPHQ: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
MTUM vs SPHQ: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
- Fees. MTUM is cheaper at 0.15% a year versus 0.20% for SPHQ. On $10,000 that is $5 a year less in fees.
- Income. SPHQ pays more income, yielding 1.03% over the last twelve months versus 0.63% for MTUM. That is about $40 more a year on $10,000. Both pay quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, SPHQ returned 74.1% versus 68.0% for MTUM, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $17,415 in SPHQ and $16,798 in MTUM.
- Risk. MTUM has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -32.3%, against -25.1% for SPHQ.
- Diversification. MTUM holds 125 positions and SPHQ holds 100. The ten largest positions make up 37.1% of MTUM and 44.0% of SPHQ.
- Overlap. 24% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 22 shared holdings.
- Dividend growth. MTUM grew its yearly payout 22.9% a year over the last 4 years, versus 6.6% for SPHQ.
Bottom line: MTUM fits better if you care most about lower fees and faster dividend growth. SPHQ fits better if you care most about more income today, stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns.
Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
| Metric | MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 0.63% | 1.03% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $1.85 | $0.87 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.6035 on Sep 18, 2026 | $0.1541 on Sep 25, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 15, 2026 | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 22.9% over 4 yrs | 6.6% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $295.84 | $84.34 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | 1 year |
| Beta | 1.24 | 0.81 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -32.3% | -25.1% |
| Market cap | $28.22B | $18.73B |
| Exchange | CBOE | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.20% |
| Assets under management | $18.75B | $18.83B |
| Number of holdings | 125 | 100 |
| Top 10 concentration | 37.1% | 44.0% |
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.
MTUM
$5.22/mo
$63 /yr at 0.63% yield
SPHQ
$8.58/mo
$103 /yr at 1.03% yield
Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. MTUM pays quarterly; SPHQ pays quarterly.
| Year | MTUM | SPHQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.2726 | $0.8148 |
| 2024 | $1.5482 | $0.7699 |
| 2023 | $2.1122 | $0.7704 |
| 2022 | $2.6197 | $0.8147 |
| 2021 | $0.9971 | $0.6308 |
Strategy: Factor and momentum
Rules-based funds that tilt toward a single trait linked to long-run returns, such as momentum, quality or low volatility. Momentum funds rebalance into recent winners, quality funds favor high profitability and strong balance sheets, and low-volatility funds pick the steadiest stocks. The same label can hide very different rules, so the index methodology matters more than the name.
Factor tilts go through long dry spells, and momentum funds can turn over quickly and get caught out when market leadership changes.
Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $16,798 in MTUM and $17,415 in SPHQ.
| Period | MTUM | SPHQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -4.45% | 0.67% |
| 3 months | -2.05% | -0.52% |
| Year to date | 18.66% | 12.38% |
| 1 year | 17.16% | 13.62% |
| 3 years | 119.37% | 73.75% |
| 5 years | 67.98% | 74.15% |
- MTUM
- SPHQ
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
- MTUM
- SPHQ
MTUM vs SPHQ holdings overlap
24% overlap by weight, with 22 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
| Largest shared holdings | MTUM weight | SPHQ weight |
|---|---|---|
| CSCOCISCO SYSTEMS INC | 3.53% | 3.49% |
| SNDKSANDISK | 2.57% | 2.72% |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIAL INC | 2.68% | 2.17% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH | 2.16% | 3.74% |
| WDCWESTERN DIGITAL CORP | 1.54% | 2.02% |
| GEVGE VERNOVA | 1.50% | 3.84% |
| TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENT | 1.30% | 2.25% |
| VLOVALERO ENERGY CORP | 1.26% | 1.18% |
| STXSEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PLC | 1.85% | 1.18% |
| KLACKLA | 1.14% | 2.19% |
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.
MTUM125 holdings total
Quick verdict
MTUM fits better if you care most about lower fees and faster dividend growth. SPHQ fits better if you care most about more income today, stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how MTUM vs SPHQ fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.
Frequently asked questions
Is MTUM or SPHQ better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. MTUM currently yields 0.63% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while SPHQ yields 1.03%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between MTUM and SPHQ?
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM) is an ETF listed on CBOE. Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, MTUM or SPHQ?
MTUM has the lower expense ratio. MTUM charges 0.15% a year and SPHQ charges 0.20%, a difference of $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, MTUM or SPHQ?
Over the last 5 years, SPHQ has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: MTUM returned 68.0% and SPHQ returned 74.1%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, MTUM or SPHQ?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, MTUM has been riskier: MTUM fell as much as 32.3% and SPHQ as much as 25.1%. Their betas are 1.24 and 0.81.
How much do MTUM and SPHQ overlap?
About 24% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 22 shared holdings. The largest shared positions are CSCO, SNDK, AMAT. Holding both still adds meaningful diversification.
How often do MTUM and SPHQ pay dividends?
Both pay quarterly. The most recent payments were $0.6035 for MTUM and $0.1541 for SPHQ.
How much income does $10,000 in MTUM vs SPHQ generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in MTUM would generate roughly $5.22 per month ($63 annually). The same amount in SPHQ would produce about $8.58 per month ($103 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both MTUM and SPHQ?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare MTUM vs SPHQ with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how MTUM and SPHQ fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.