Dividend comparison
MAGS vs QQQ: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% a year versus 0.30% for MAGS. On $10,000 that is $12 a year less in fees.
- Income. MAGS pays more income, yielding 1.35% over the last twelve months versus 0.53% for QQQ. That is about $82 more a year on $10,000. Both pay annual.
- Performance. Over the last 3 years, MAGS returned 150.1% versus 105.6% for QQQ, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $25,009 in MAGS and $20,561 in QQQ.
- Risk. QQQ has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 3 years was -35.1%, against -29.9% for MAGS.
- Diversification. QQQ holds 102 positions and MAGS holds 16. The ten largest positions make up 123.9% of MAGS and 47.2% of QQQ.
- Overlap. 29% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 7 shared holdings.
- Size. QQQ is the larger fund with $487.5 billion in assets, against $5.8 billion for MAGS.
Bottom line: MAGS fits better if you care most about more income today, stronger 3-year returns and smaller drawdowns. QQQ fits better if you care most about lower fees and broader diversification.
| Metric | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | QQQ Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 1.35% | 0.53% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $0.98 | $3.79 |
| Payout frequency | Annual | Annual |
| Last dividend | $0.9762 on Dec 31, 2025 | $0.7514 on Oct 8, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Dec 30, 2025 | Dec 21, 2026 |
| Next payment | — | $0.7941 on Dec 28, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | — | 13.3% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $72.20 | $717.63 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | — |
| Beta | 1.37 | 1.23 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -29.9% | -35.1% |
| Market cap | $3.89B | $479.05B |
| Exchange | CBOE | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.18% |
| Assets under management | $5.77B | $487.46B |
| Number of holdings | 16 | 102 |
| Top 10 concentration | 123.9% | 47.2% |
MAGS
$11.27/mo
$135 /yr at 1.35% yield
QQQ
$4.40/mo
$53 /yr at 0.53% yield
| Year | MAGS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $0.9762 | $2.7949 |
| 2024 | $0.4400 | $3.0623 |
| 2023 | — | $2.3200 |
| 2022 | — | $2.1351 |
| 2021 | — | $1.6968 |
Current income is low and outside your control, so these need pairing with something else if the portfolio has to produce cash today.
What MAGS vs QQQ actually do
The index is modified market-cap weighted and excludes financials by rule, which is why it lands so heavily in technology, communication services and consumer discretionary names. In December 2025 the fund converted from a unit investment trust to a conventional open-end fund and cut its fee, so it can now reinvest income and lend securities like its peers. It remains the most liquid Nasdaq-100 vehicle by a wide margin and the reference asset for a large share of the options-income products in this category.
Suits investors who want concentrated large-cap growth exposure and anyone who needs deep options liquidity. Dividends are incidental, so it does not answer an income mandate on its own.
Growth-tilted core, concentrated
| Period | MAGS | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 2.47% | -0.43% |
| 3 months | 7.91% | 3.10% |
| Year to date | 9.46% | 17.09% |
| 1 year | 10.58% | 17.78% |
| 3 years | 150.09% | 105.61% |
| 5 years | — | 96.98% |
- MAGS
- QQQ
Both series indexed to 100 on 2023-04-11 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- MAGS
- QQQ
MAGS16 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| 912797UJ4United States Treasury Bill 10/08/2026 | 47.05% |
| 912797VA2United States Treasury Bill 12/03/2026 | 17.34% |
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | 13.24% |
| 912797VP9United States Treasury Bill 11/03/2026 | 8.70% |
| 912797WN3United States Treasury Bill 01/05/2027 | 8.64% |
| XBOXRoundhill Ultra Short Duration No Dividend Target ETF | 5.99% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 5.79% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 5.75% |
| XBOXRoundhill Box Spread ETF | 5.72% |
| 023135106 TRS 071426 NMAMAZON.COM INC SWAP | 5.67% |
Quick verdict
MAGS fits better if you care most about more income today, stronger 3-year returns and smaller drawdowns. QQQ fits better if you care most about lower fees and broader diversification. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is MAGS or QQQ better for dividend income?
What is the difference between MAGS and QQQ?
Which is cheaper, MAGS or QQQ?
Which has performed better, MAGS or QQQ?
Which is riskier, MAGS or QQQ?
How much do MAGS and QQQ overlap?
How often do MAGS and QQQ pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in MAGS vs QQQ generate?
Can I hold both MAGS and QQQ?
Where can I compare MAGS vs QQQ with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.