Dividend comparison
LQD vs JNK: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. LQD is cheaper at 0.14% a year versus 0.40% for JNK. On $10,000 that is $26 a year less in fees.
- Income. JNK pays more income, yielding 6.87% over the last twelve months versus 4.89% for LQD. That is about $197 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, JNK returned 14.2% versus -8.0% for LQD, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $11,417 in JNK and $9,203 in LQD.
- Risk. LQD has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -24.5%, against -16.7% for JNK.
- Diversification. LQD holds 3,181 positions and JNK holds 1,161.
- Dividend growth. LQD grew its yearly payout 12.9% a year over the last 4 years, versus 8.3% for JNK.
- Size. LQD is the larger fund with $28.8 billion in assets, against $5.6 billion for JNK.
Bottom line: LQD fits better if you care most about lower fees, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. JNK fits better if you care most about more income today, stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns.
| Metric | LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | JNK State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 4.89% | 6.87% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $5.05 | $6.33 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.4387 on Oct 6, 2026 | $0.5313 on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 12.9% over 4 yrs | 8.3% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $103.22 | $92.24 |
| Dividend growth streak | 4 years | 4 years |
| Beta | 1.34 | 0.67 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -24.5% | -16.7% |
| Market cap | $28.79B | $7.10B |
| Exchange | AMEX | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.40% |
| Assets under management | $28.78B | $5.63B |
| Number of holdings | 3181 | 1161 |
LQD
$40.76/mo
$489 /yr at 4.89% yield
JNK
$57.21/mo
$687 /yr at 6.87% yield
| Year | LQD | JNK |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $4.9377 | $6.3585 |
| 2024 | $4.7508 | $6.3287 |
| 2023 | $4.4203 | $6.0464 |
| 2022 | $3.4793 | $5.4563 |
| 2021 | $3.0444 | $4.6304 |
Bond prices fall when interest rates rise, and long-duration funds can lose as much as stocks in a fast rate-hiking cycle.
| Period | LQD | JNK |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -1.41% | -1.88% |
| 3 months | -4.03% | -2.24% |
| Year to date | -6.33% | -0.26% |
| 1 year | -7.61% | 1.10% |
| 3 years | 15.14% | 25.63% |
| 5 years | -7.97% | 14.17% |
- LQD
- JNK
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- LQD
- JNK
Quick verdict
LQD fits better if you care most about lower fees, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. JNK fits better if you care most about more income today, stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is LQD or JNK better for dividend income?
What is the difference between LQD and JNK?
Which is cheaper, LQD or JNK?
Which has performed better, LQD or JNK?
Which is riskier, LQD or JNK?
How often do LQD and JNK pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in LQD vs JNK generate?
Can I hold both LQD and JNK?
Where can I compare LQD vs JNK with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.