Dividend comparison
YBTC vs BTCI: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Roundhill Investments - Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF, side by side. Updated October 24, 2026.
- Fees. YBTC is cheaper at 0.95% a year versus 0.99% for BTCI. On $10,000 that is $4 a year less in fees.
- Income. YBTC pays more income, yielding 55.87% over the last twelve months versus 33.62% for BTCI. That is about $2,225 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 1 year, BTCI returned -40.1% versus -50.3% for YBTC, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $5,990 in BTCI and $4,968 in YBTC.
- Risk. YBTC has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 1 year was -62.1%, against -55.9% for BTCI.
- Size. BTCI is the larger fund with $1.4 billion in assets, against $139 million for YBTC.
Bottom line: YBTC fits better if you care most about lower fees and more income today. BTCI fits better if you care most about stronger 1-year returns and smaller drawdowns.
| Metric | YBTC Roundhill Investments - Bitcoin Covered Call Strategy ETF | BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 55.87% | 33.62% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $10.29 | $10.83 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.1450 on Oct 22, 2026 | $0.6950 on Oct 23, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 21, 2026 | Oct 21, 2026 |
| Price | $18.41 | $32.22 |
| Beta | 1.01 | 1.42 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -62.1% | -55.9% |
| Market cap | $140.1M | $1.41B |
| Exchange | CBOE | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.99% |
| Assets under management | $139.0M | $1.44B |
| Number of holdings | 6 | — |
| Top 10 concentration | 210.0% | — |
YBTC
$465.57/mo
$5587 /yr at 55.87% yield
BTCI
$280.13/mo
$3362 /yr at 33.62% yield
| Year | YBTC | BTCI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $20.2469 | $16.0521 |
Distributions vary sharply, have included return of capital, and upside is capped while downside is not, so net asset value can fall a long way even in periods when the payments keep arriving.
What YBTC vs BTCI actually do
It does not own bitcoin or a bitcoin fund. Instead it holds long calls and short puts at matching strikes on a bitcoin ETF, which together replicate the price movement of the reference asset, with Treasuries posted as collateral. Against that synthetic position it writes weekly call options, so upside is capped every single week while the full downside of bitcoin passes through unhedged.
Suits a holder who wants frequent cash flow from a bitcoin allocation and understands that a weekly cap plus uncapped downside is an asymmetric bargain. Not appropriate for anyone treating it as a way to own bitcoin, because in a sustained rally the capped structure will fall a long way behind the asset it references.
Speculative income, very high volatility
Rather than owning bitcoin or futures directly, it holds spot bitcoin ETPs such as IBIT and HODL, then sells calls on bitcoin-related funds to collect premium. Bitcoin's implied volatility is extreme by equity standards, so the premium collected and the resulting distributions are very large, and so is the amount of upside handed over when bitcoin runs. Fees are around 1% a year, which is high in absolute terms though normal for this category.
Suits someone who already wants bitcoin exposure and would rather convert its volatility into monthly cash than wait for appreciation. Entirely unsuitable as a core income holding: the underlying asset can halve, the distribution is not contractual, and the call overlay removes exactly the upside that justifies owning bitcoin in the first place.
Speculative income, very high volatility
| Period | YBTC | BTCI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -4.75% | -6.18% |
| 3 months | 1.82% | 11.72% |
| Year to date | -35.18% | -26.60% |
| 1 year | -50.32% | -40.10% |
| 3 years | — | — |
| 5 years | — | — |
- YBTC
- BTCI
Both series indexed to 100 on 2024-10-17 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- YBTC
- BTCI
YBTC6 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| 912797VA2United States Treasury Bill 12/03/2026 | 91.73% |
| 912797UJ4United States Treasury Bill 10/08/2026 | 90.20% |
| 4IBIT 260821C00036440IBIT 08/21/2026 36.44 C | 12.98% |
| 4IBIT 260918C00043870IBIT 09/18/2026 43.87 C | 6.49% |
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | 5.65% |
| 4IBIT 261016C00045860IBIT 10/16/2026 45.86 C | 3.15% |
| 4IBIT 260821P00036440IBIT 08/21/2026 36.44 P | -0.01% |
| 4IBIT 260814C00037890IBIT 08/14/2026 37.89 C | -0.03% |
| 4IBIT 260731C00037930IBIT 07/31/2026 37.93 C | -0.03% |
| 4IBIT 260724C00037510IBIT 07/24/2026 37.51 C | -0.15% |
Quick verdict
YBTC fits better if you care most about lower fees and more income today. BTCI fits better if you care most about stronger 1-year returns and smaller drawdowns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is YBTC or BTCI better for dividend income?
What is the difference between YBTC and BTCI?
Which is cheaper, YBTC or BTCI?
Which has performed better, YBTC or BTCI?
Which is riskier, YBTC or BTCI?
How often do YBTC and BTCI pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in YBTC vs BTCI generate?
Can I hold both YBTC and BTCI?
Where can I compare YBTC vs BTCI with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.