Dividend comparison
BITA vs BTCI: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for The iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. BITA is cheaper at 0.65% a year versus 0.99% for BTCI. On $10,000 that is $34 a year less in fees.
- Income. BTCI pays more income, yielding 30.36% over the last twelve months versus 4.39% for BITA. That is about $2,597 more a year on $10,000. BITA pays quarterly, BTCI pays monthly.
- Risk. BTCI has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -55.9%, against -7.4% for BITA.
- Size. BTCI is the larger fund with $1.4 billion in assets, against $97 million for BITA.
Bottom line: BITA fits better if you care most about lower fees and smaller drawdowns. BTCI fits better if you care most about more income today.
| Metric | BITA The iShares Bitcoin Premium Income ETF | BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 4.39% | 30.36% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $18.04 | $10.14 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.7260 on Oct 7, 2026 | $0.7180 on Sep 18, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 2, 2026 | Sep 16, 2026 |
| Price | $62.08 | $33.39 |
| Beta | 1.10 | 1.42 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -7.4% | -55.9% |
| Market cap | $12.3M | $1.41B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.65% | 0.99% |
| Assets under management | $97.3M | $1.42B |
| Number of holdings | 2 | — |
BITA
$36.57/mo
$439 /yr at 4.39% yield
BTCI
$252.97/mo
$3036 /yr at 30.36% yield
| Year | BITA | BTCI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | — | $16.0521 |
Distributions vary sharply, have included return of capital, and upside is capped while downside is not, so net asset value can fall a long way even in periods when the payments keep arriving.
What BITA vs BTCI actually do
Rather than owning bitcoin or futures directly, it holds spot bitcoin ETPs such as IBIT and HODL, then sells calls on bitcoin-related funds to collect premium. Bitcoin's implied volatility is extreme by equity standards, so the premium collected and the resulting distributions are very large, and so is the amount of upside handed over when bitcoin runs. Fees are around 1% a year, which is high in absolute terms though normal for this category.
Suits someone who already wants bitcoin exposure and would rather convert its volatility into monthly cash than wait for appreciation. Entirely unsuitable as a core income holding: the underlying asset can halve, the distribution is not contractual, and the call overlay removes exactly the upside that justifies owning bitcoin in the first place.
Speculative income, very high volatility
| Period | BITA | BTCI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 0.84% | 1.77% |
| 3 months | 19.75% | 15.34% |
| Year to date | — | -24.15% |
| 1 year | — | -39.59% |
| 3 years | — | — |
| 5 years | — | — |
- BITA
- BTCI
Both series indexed to 100 on 2026-06-22 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- BITA
- BTCI
Quick verdict
BITA fits better if you care most about lower fees and smaller drawdowns. BTCI fits better if you care most about more income today. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is BITA or BTCI better for dividend income?
What is the difference between BITA and BTCI?
Which is cheaper, BITA or BTCI?
Which is riskier, BITA or BTCI?
How often do BITA and BTCI pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in BITA vs BTCI generate?
Can I hold both BITA and BTCI?
Where can I compare BITA vs BTCI with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.