Dividend comparison
BITO vs BTCI: Which Is Better for Income?
Side-by-side yield, projected income, and dividend fundamentals for ProShares Bitcoin ETF and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF. Updated July 26, 2026.
| Metric | BITO ProShares Bitcoin ETF | BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | — | — |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | — | — |
| Price | $8.70 | $28.39 |
| Payout ratio (TTM) | — | — |
| Dividend growth streak | — | — |
| Beta | 1.73 | 1.44 |
| Market cap | $1.77B | $463.7M |
| Exchange | AMEX | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.95% | 0.99% |
| Assets under management | $1.40B | $1.10B |
| Number of holdings | 5 | — |
| Top 10 concentration | — | — |
BITO
—/mo
Yield data unavailable
BTCI
—/mo
Yield data unavailable
Distributions vary sharply, have included return of capital, and upside is capped while downside is not, so net asset value can fall a long way even in periods when the payments keep arriving.
What BITO vs BTCI actually do
It buys front-month CME bitcoin futures and rolls them forward as each contract nears expiry, holding Treasuries as collateral. When longer-dated contracts trade above nearer ones, a condition called contango that has been common in bitcoin futures, each roll sells low and buys high and drags on return relative to spot bitcoin. Fees are around 0.95% a year on top of that roll cost, and its distributions come from collateral interest and realized futures gains rather than from anything the asset pays.
Suits an account that cannot hold spot bitcoin products directly but can hold a futures-based fund. Since spot bitcoin ETFs became available in 2024 the structural case for the futures wrapper is much narrower, and the combination of roll drag and fee means it should not be expected to keep pace with bitcoin itself.
High volatility, structural tracking drag
Rather than owning bitcoin or futures directly, it holds spot bitcoin ETPs such as IBIT and HODL, then sells calls on bitcoin-related funds to collect premium. Bitcoin's implied volatility is extreme by equity standards, so the premium collected and the resulting distributions are very large, and so is the amount of upside handed over when bitcoin runs. Fees are around 1% a year, which is high in absolute terms though normal for this category.
Suits someone who already wants bitcoin exposure and would rather convert its volatility into monthly cash than wait for appreciation. Entirely unsuitable as a core income holding: the underlying asset can halve, the distribution is not contractual, and the call overlay removes exactly the upside that justifies owning bitcoin in the first place.
Speculative income, very high volatility
| Period | BITO | BTCI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 6.75% | 4.18% |
| 3 months | -18.31% | -20.99% |
| Year to date | -28.45% | -35.51% |
| 1 year | -51.40% | -51.14% |
| 3 years | 70.92% | — |
| 5 years | — | — |
- BITO
- BTCI
Both series indexed to 100 on 2024-10-17 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- BITO
- BTCI
Quick verdict
Compare the metrics above, then add both tickers to a Dividend Wealth portfolio to see combined income forecasts and diversification impact.
Frequently asked questions
Is BITO or BTCI better for dividend income?
What is the difference between BITO and BTCI?
Can I hold both BITO and BTCI?
Where can I compare BITO vs BTCI with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.