Dividend comparison
VCSH vs LQD: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. VCSH is cheaper at 0.03% a year versus 0.14% for LQD. On $10,000 that is $11 a year less in fees.
- Income. LQD pays more income, yielding 4.89% over the last twelve months versus 4.56% for VCSH. That is about $34 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, VCSH returned 8.2% versus -8.0% for LQD, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $10,824 in VCSH and $9,203 in LQD.
- Risk. LQD has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -24.5%, against -9.0% for VCSH.
- Diversification. LQD holds 3,181 positions and VCSH holds 12.
- Dividend growth. VCSH grew its yearly payout 23.9% a year over the last 4 years, versus 12.9% for LQD.
Bottom line: VCSH fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and faster dividend growth. LQD fits better if you care most about more income today and broader diversification.
| Metric | VCSH Vanguard Short-Term Corporate Bond ETF | LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 4.56% | 4.89% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $3.53 | $5.05 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.2953 on Oct 5, 2026 | $0.4387 on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 23.9% over 4 yrs | 12.9% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $77.40 | $103.22 |
| Dividend growth streak | 4 years | 4 years |
| Beta | 0.41 | 1.34 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -9.0% | -24.5% |
| Market cap | $50.79B | $28.79B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.14% |
| Assets under management | $50.80B | $28.78B |
| Number of holdings | 12 | 3181 |
VCSH
$37.96/mo
$456 /yr at 4.56% yield
LQD
$40.76/mo
$489 /yr at 4.89% yield
| Year | VCSH | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.4655 | $4.9377 |
| 2024 | $3.0909 | $4.7508 |
| 2023 | $2.3939 | $4.4203 |
| 2022 | $1.5140 | $3.4793 |
| 2021 | $1.4725 | $3.0444 |
Bond prices fall when interest rates rise, and long-duration funds can lose as much as stocks in a fast rate-hiking cycle.
| Period | VCSH | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.35% | -1.41% |
| 3 months | -1.68% | -4.03% |
| Year to date | -2.92% | -6.33% |
| 1 year | -2.63% | -7.61% |
| 3 years | 13.19% | 15.14% |
| 5 years | 8.24% | -7.97% |
- VCSH
- LQD
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- VCSH
- LQD
Quick verdict
VCSH fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and faster dividend growth. LQD fits better if you care most about more income today and broader diversification. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is VCSH or LQD better for dividend income?
What is the difference between VCSH and LQD?
Which is cheaper, VCSH or LQD?
Which has performed better, VCSH or LQD?
Which is riskier, VCSH or LQD?
How often do VCSH and LQD pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in VCSH vs LQD generate?
Can I hold both VCSH and LQD?
Where can I compare VCSH vs LQD with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.