Dividend comparison
SPHD vs RDVY: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
SPHD vs RDVY: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
- Fees. SPHD is cheaper at 0.30% a year versus 0.47% for RDVY. On $10,000 that is $17 a year less in fees.
- Income. SPHD pays more income, yielding 4.87% over the last twelve months versus 0.85% for RDVY. That is about $402 more a year on $10,000. SPHD pays monthly, RDVY pays quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, RDVY returned 69.8% versus 35.9% for SPHD, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $16,979 in RDVY and $13,591 in SPHD.
- Risk. RDVY has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -25.3%, against -19.5% for SPHD.
- Diversification. RDVY holds 72 positions and SPHD holds 54. The ten largest positions make up 28.8% of SPHD and 22.1% of RDVY.
- Overlap. 1% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 2 shared holdings. They mostly own different companies, so they can complement each other.
- Dividend growth. RDVY grew its yearly payout 9.4% a year over the last 4 years, versus 5.4% for SPHD.
- Size. RDVY is the larger fund with $25.4 billion in assets, against $3.3 billion for SPHD.
Bottom line: SPHD fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today and smaller drawdowns. RDVY fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth.
Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
| Metric | SPHD Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 4.87% | 0.85% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $2.47 | $0.68 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.2016 on Sep 25, 2026 | $0.1521 on Sep 30, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 19, 2026 | Sep 24, 2026 |
| Next payment | $0.2010 on Oct 23, 2026 | — |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 5.4% over 4 yrs | 9.4% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $50.64 | $79.63 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | — |
| Beta | 0.47 | 0.94 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -19.5% | -25.3% |
| Market cap | $3.29B | $25.45B |
| Exchange | AMEX | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.47% |
| Assets under management | $3.26B | $25.45B |
| Number of holdings | 54 | 72 |
| Top 10 concentration | 28.8% | 22.1% |
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.
SPHD
$40.59/mo
$487 /yr at 4.87% yield
RDVY
$7.12/mo
$85 /yr at 0.85% yield
Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. SPHD pays monthly; RDVY pays quarterly.
| Year | SPHD | RDVY |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.9308 | $0.7733 |
| 2024 | $1.6464 | $0.9722 |
| 2023 | $1.9010 | $1.0797 |
| 2022 | $1.7038 | $0.9700 |
| 2021 | $1.5643 | $0.5390 |
Strategy: Dividend equity
Rules-based equity funds that screen for companies paying sustainable or rising dividends, aiming at income plus long-term share-price participation. The screen is what defines the fund: yield-ranked indexes deliver more cash now, dividend-growth indexes deliberately exclude the highest payers in favor of durability. Both approaches produce a sector mix that looks nothing like the broad market, typically heavier in financials, healthcare, staples and industrials.
Expect stretches of underperformance versus the broad market whenever leadership comes from the high-growth, low-yield companies these screens exclude.
Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $13,591 in SPHD and $16,979 in RDVY.
| Period | SPHD | RDVY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 1.22% | 0.40% |
| 3 months | -4.22% | -0.46% |
| Year to date | 5.50% | 14.63% |
| 1 year | 4.33% | 18.85% |
| 3 years | 44.23% | 86.40% |
| 5 years | 35.91% | 69.79% |
- SPHD
- RDVY
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
- SPHD
- RDVY
SPHD vs RDVY holdings overlap
1% overlap by weight, with 2 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.
SPHD54 holdings total
RDVY72 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| TRVThe Travelers Companies, Inc. | 2.37% |
| ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc. | 2.28% |
| VVisa Inc. (Class A) | 2.26% |
| EXPEExpedia Group, Inc. | 2.21% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corporation | 2.20% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. (Class A) | 2.17% |
| ROSTRoss Stores, Inc. | 2.15% |
| GEVGE Vernova Inc. | 2.15% |
| ACNAccenture plc | 2.14% |
| ALLThe Allstate Corporation | 2.13% |
Quick verdict
SPHD fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today and smaller drawdowns. RDVY fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how SPHD vs RDVY fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.
Frequently asked questions
Is SPHD or RDVY better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. SPHD currently yields 4.87% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while RDVY yields 0.85%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between SPHD and RDVY?
Invesco S&P 500 High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) is an ETF listed on AMEX. First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) is an ETF listed on NASDAQ. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, SPHD or RDVY?
SPHD has the lower expense ratio. SPHD charges 0.30% a year and RDVY charges 0.47%, a difference of $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, SPHD or RDVY?
Over the last 5 years, RDVY has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: SPHD returned 35.9% and RDVY returned 69.8%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, SPHD or RDVY?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, RDVY has been riskier: SPHD fell as much as 19.5% and RDVY as much as 25.3%. Their betas are 0.47 and 0.94.
How much do SPHD and RDVY overlap?
About 1% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 2 shared holdings. The largest shared positions are RF, USB. Holding both still adds meaningful diversification.
How often do SPHD and RDVY pay dividends?
SPHD pays monthly and RDVY pays quarterly.
How much income does $10,000 in SPHD vs RDVY generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in SPHD would generate roughly $40.59 per month ($487 annually). The same amount in RDVY would produce about $7.12 per month ($85 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both SPHD and RDVY?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare SPHD vs RDVY with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how SPHD and RDVY fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.