Dividend comparison
SOXQ vs PSI: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF and Invesco Semiconductors ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. SOXQ is cheaper at 0.19% a year versus 0.55% for PSI. On $10,000 that is $36 a year less in fees.
- Income. SOXQ pays more income, yielding 0.33% over the last twelve months versus 0.02% for PSI. That is about $31 more a year on $10,000. SOXQ pays quarterly, PSI pays semi-annual.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, SOXQ returned 246.6% versus 196.3% for PSI, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $34,662 in SOXQ and $29,629 in PSI.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 5 years were similar: -46.0% for SOXQ and -44.8% for PSI from peak to trough.
- Diversification. SOXQ holds 31 positions and PSI holds 30. The ten largest positions make up 59.4% of SOXQ and 51.6% of PSI.
- Overlap. 53% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 19 shared holdings.
- Dividend growth. PSI grew its yearly payout 1.6% a year over the last 3 years, versus 1.1% for SOXQ.
Bottom line: SOXQ has the edge on these figures, with lower fees, more income today and stronger 5-year returns. PSI does not lead on any of the measures compared here.
| Metric | SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF | PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 0.33% | 0.02% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $0.29 | $0.02 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Semi-annual |
| Last dividend | $0.0845 on Sep 25, 2026 | $0.0163 on Jun 26, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 21, 2026 | Jun 22, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 1.1% over 3 yrs | 1.6% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $88.77 | $126.19 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | — |
| Beta | 2.19 | 2.26 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -46.0% | -44.8% |
| Market cap | $2.81B | $2.10B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.55% |
| Assets under management | $2.89B | $2.62B |
| Number of holdings | 31 | 30 |
| Top 10 concentration | 59.4% | 51.6% |
SOXQ
$2.76/mo
$33 /yr at 0.33% yield
PSI
$0.16/mo
$2 /yr at 0.02% yield
| Year | SOXQ | PSI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $0.2795 | $0.0762 |
| 2024 | $0.2666 | $0.0840 |
| 2023 | $0.2863 | $0.1986 |
| 2022 | $0.2707 | $0.2040 |
| 2021 | — | $0.0714 |
A single sector can fall far further than the broad market and stay down for years, and the largest names often dominate the fund.
| Period | SOXQ | PSI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -5.34% | -9.47% |
| 3 months | -3.36% | -12.11% |
| Year to date | 59.17% | 60.04% |
| 1 year | 63.87% | 68.12% |
| 3 years | 244.60% | 217.14% |
| 5 years | 246.62% | 196.29% |
- SOXQ
- PSI
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- SOXQ
- PSI
| Largest shared holdings | SOXQ weight | PSI weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 12.07% | 6.41% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 7.60% | 5.16% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.66% | 5.97% |
| ADIAnalog Devices Inc | 4.53% | 5.61% |
| TXNTexas Instruments Inc | 4.39% | 5.64% |
| INTCIntel Corp | 4.16% | 5.59% |
| KLACKLA Corp | 3.92% | 4.82% |
| AMATApplied Materials Inc | 3.70% | 4.57% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 3.63% | 4.60% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 2.80% | 2.55% |
SOXQ31 holdings total
Quick verdict
SOXQ has the edge on these figures, with lower fees, more income today and stronger 5-year returns. PSI does not lead on any of the measures compared here. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is SOXQ or PSI better for dividend income?
What is the difference between SOXQ and PSI?
Which is cheaper, SOXQ or PSI?
Which has performed better, SOXQ or PSI?
Which is riskier, SOXQ or PSI?
How much do SOXQ and PSI overlap?
How often do SOXQ and PSI pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in SOXQ vs PSI generate?
Can I hold both SOXQ and PSI?
Where can I compare SOXQ vs PSI with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.