Dividend comparison
SOXX vs PSI: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for iShares Semiconductor ETF and Invesco Semiconductors ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. SOXX is cheaper at 0.33% a year versus 0.55% for PSI. On $10,000 that is $22 a year less in fees.
- Income. SOXX pays more income, yielding 0.25% over the last twelve months versus 0.02% for PSI. That is about $23 more a year on $10,000. SOXX pays quarterly, PSI pays semi-annual.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, SOXX returned 236.7% versus 196.3% for PSI, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $33,671 in SOXX and $29,629 in PSI.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 5 years were similar: -45.8% for SOXX and -44.8% for PSI from peak to trough.
- Diversification. SOXX holds 30 positions and PSI holds 30. The ten largest positions make up 61.6% of SOXX and 51.6% of PSI.
- Overlap. 55% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 16 shared holdings.
- Dividend growth. SOXX grew its yearly payout 11.9% a year over the last 4 years, versus 1.6% for PSI.
- Size. SOXX is the larger fund with $40.7 billion in assets, against $2.6 billion for PSI.
Bottom line: SOXX has the edge on these figures, with lower fees, stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. PSI does not lead on any of the measures compared here.
| Metric | SOXX iShares Semiconductor ETF | PSI Invesco Semiconductors ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 0.25% | 0.02% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $1.25 | $0.02 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Semi-annual |
| Last dividend | $0.3251 on Sep 18, 2026 | $0.0163 on Jun 26, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 15, 2026 | Jun 22, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 11.9% over 4 yrs | 1.6% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $500.01 | $126.19 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | — |
| Beta | 2.24 | 2.26 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -45.8% | -44.8% |
| Market cap | $39.35B | $2.10B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.55% |
| Assets under management | $40.71B | $2.62B |
| Number of holdings | 30 | 30 |
| Top 10 concentration | 61.6% | 51.6% |
SOXX
$2.09/mo
$25 /yr at 0.25% yield
PSI
$0.16/mo
$2 /yr at 0.02% yield
| Year | SOXX | PSI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.7214 | $0.0762 |
| 2024 | $1.4455 | $0.0840 |
| 2023 | $1.5039 | $0.1986 |
| 2022 | $1.5075 | $0.2040 |
| 2021 | $1.0993 | $0.0714 |
A single sector can fall far further than the broad market and stay down for years, and the largest names often dominate the fund.
| Period | SOXX | PSI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -6.20% | -9.47% |
| 3 months | -4.54% | -12.11% |
| Year to date | 66.33% | 60.04% |
| 1 year | 71.22% | 68.12% |
| 3 years | 233.45% | 217.14% |
| 5 years | 236.71% | 196.29% |
- SOXX
- PSI
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- SOXX
- PSI
| Largest shared holdings | SOXX weight | PSI weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA | 7.95% | 6.41% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 9.25% | 5.97% |
| INTCINTEL CORPORATION | 8.32% | 5.59% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY | 7.64% | 5.16% |
| ADIANALOG DEVICES | 4.40% | 5.61% |
| TXNTEXAS INSTRUMENT | 4.28% | 5.64% |
| KLACKLA | 3.84% | 4.82% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH | 3.65% | 4.60% |
| AMATAPPLIED MATERIAL INC | 3.65% | 4.57% |
| TERTERADYNE | 2.91% | 2.65% |
SOXX30 holdings total
Quick verdict
SOXX has the edge on these figures, with lower fees, stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. PSI does not lead on any of the measures compared here. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is SOXX or PSI better for dividend income?
What is the difference between SOXX and PSI?
Which is cheaper, SOXX or PSI?
Which has performed better, SOXX or PSI?
Which is riskier, SOXX or PSI?
How much do SOXX and PSI overlap?
How often do SOXX and PSI pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in SOXX vs PSI generate?
Can I hold both SOXX and PSI?
Where can I compare SOXX vs PSI with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.