Dividend comparison
VGT vs SOXQ: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard Information Technology ETF and Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. VGT is cheaper at 0.09% a year versus 0.19% for SOXQ. On $10,000 that is $10 a year less in fees.
- Income. Their trailing yields are almost the same: 0.39% for VGT and 0.33% for SOXQ. VGT pays annual, SOXQ pays quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, SOXQ returned 246.6% versus 132.3% for VGT, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $34,662 in SOXQ and $23,232 in VGT.
- Risk. SOXQ has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -46.0%, against -35.1% for VGT.
- Diversification. VGT holds 310 positions and SOXQ holds 31. The ten largest positions make up 63.6% of VGT and 59.4% of SOXQ.
- Overlap. 36% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 26 shared holdings.
- Dividend growth. SOXQ grew its yearly payout 1.1% a year over the last 3 years, versus 1.0% for VGT.
- Size. VGT is the larger fund with $178.0 billion in assets, against $2.9 billion for SOXQ.
Bottom line: VGT fits better if you care most about lower fees, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. SOXQ fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns.
| Metric | VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | SOXQ Invesco PHLX Semiconductor ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 0.39% | 0.33% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $0.47 | $0.29 |
| Payout frequency | Annual | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.1465 on Sep 25, 2026 | $0.0845 on Sep 25, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 23, 2026 | Sep 21, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 1.0% over 4 yrs | 1.1% over 3 yrs |
| Price | $120.20 | $88.77 |
| Dividend growth streak | — | 1 year |
| Beta | 1.35 | 2.19 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -35.1% | -46.0% |
| Market cap | $138.44B | $2.81B |
| Exchange | AMEX | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.19% |
| Assets under management | $178.00B | $2.89B |
| Number of holdings | 310 | 31 |
| Top 10 concentration | 63.6% | 59.4% |
VGT
$3.28/mo
$39 /yr at 0.39% yield
SOXQ
$2.76/mo
$33 /yr at 0.33% yield
| Year | VGT | SOXQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $0.3810 | $0.2795 |
| 2024 | $0.4644 | $0.2666 |
| 2023 | $0.3904 | $0.2863 |
| 2022 | $0.3636 | $0.2707 |
| 2021 | $0.3654 | — |
A single sector can fall far further than the broad market and stay down for years, and the largest names often dominate the fund.
| Period | VGT | SOXQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -1.61% | -5.34% |
| 3 months | 6.28% | -3.36% |
| Year to date | 28.02% | 59.17% |
| 1 year | 26.74% | 63.87% |
| 3 years | 138.07% | 244.60% |
| 5 years | 132.32% | 246.62% |
- VGT
- SOXQ
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- VGT
- SOXQ
| Largest shared holdings | VGT weight | SOXQ weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 17.58% | 12.07% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 4.45% | 7.60% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.11% | 9.20% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.67% | 4.66% |
| INTCIntel Corp | 1.98% | 4.16% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 1.55% | 3.63% |
| AMATApplied Materials Inc | 1.53% | 3.70% |
| KLACKLA Corp | 0.98% | 3.92% |
| TXNTexas Instruments Inc | 0.98% | 4.39% |
| MRVLMarvell Technology Inc | 0.88% | 4.46% |
Quick verdict
VGT fits better if you care most about lower fees, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. SOXQ fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is VGT or SOXQ better for dividend income?
What is the difference between VGT and SOXQ?
Which is cheaper, VGT or SOXQ?
Which has performed better, VGT or SOXQ?
Which is riskier, VGT or SOXQ?
How much do VGT and SOXQ overlap?
How often do VGT and SOXQ pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in VGT vs SOXQ generate?
Can I hold both VGT and SOXQ?
Where can I compare VGT vs SOXQ with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.