Dividend comparison
SCHZ vs LQD: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF and iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. SCHZ is cheaper at 0.03% a year versus 0.14% for LQD. On $10,000 that is $11 a year less in fees.
- Income. LQD pays more income, yielding 4.89% over the last twelve months versus 4.32% for SCHZ. That is about $57 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, SCHZ returned -2.8% versus -8.0% for LQD, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $9,716 in SCHZ and $9,203 in LQD.
- Risk. LQD has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -24.5%, against -17.4% for SCHZ.
- Diversification. SCHZ holds 12,612 positions and LQD holds 3,181.
- Dividend growth. SCHZ grew its yearly payout 12.9% a year over the last 4 years, versus 12.9% for LQD.
- Size. LQD is the larger fund with $28.8 billion in assets, against $10.6 billion for SCHZ.
Bottom line: SCHZ fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. LQD fits better if you care most about more income today.
| Metric | SCHZ Schwab U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 4.32% | 4.89% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $0.96 | $5.05 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.0821 on Oct 7, 2026 | $0.4387 on Oct 6, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 12.9% over 4 yrs | 12.9% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $22.27 | $103.22 |
| Dividend growth streak | 4 years | 4 years |
| Beta | 0.99 | 1.34 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -17.4% | -24.5% |
| Market cap | $10.67B | $28.79B |
| Exchange | AMEX | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.03% | 0.14% |
| Assets under management | $10.64B | $28.78B |
| Number of holdings | 12612 | 3181 |
| Top 10 concentration | 1.1% | — |
SCHZ
$35.99/mo
$432 /yr at 4.32% yield
LQD
$40.76/mo
$489 /yr at 4.89% yield
| Year | SCHZ | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $0.9465 | $4.9377 |
| 2024 | $0.8993 | $4.7508 |
| 2023 | $0.7647 | $4.4203 |
| 2022 | $0.5998 | $3.4793 |
| 2021 | $0.5827 | $3.0444 |
Bond prices fall when interest rates rise, and long-duration funds can lose as much as stocks in a fast rate-hiking cycle.
| Period | SCHZ | LQD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.31% | -1.41% |
| 3 months | -1.68% | -4.03% |
| Year to date | -1.63% | -6.33% |
| 1 year | -1.89% | -7.61% |
| 3 years | 14.56% | 15.14% |
| 5 years | -2.84% | -7.97% |
- SCHZ
- LQD
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- SCHZ
- LQD
Quick verdict
SCHZ fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. LQD fits better if you care most about more income today. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is SCHZ or LQD better for dividend income?
What is the difference between SCHZ and LQD?
Which is cheaper, SCHZ or LQD?
Which has performed better, SCHZ or LQD?
Which is riskier, SCHZ or LQD?
How often do SCHZ and LQD pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in SCHZ vs LQD generate?
Can I hold both SCHZ and LQD?
Where can I compare SCHZ vs LQD with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.