Dividend comparison
ROKT vs UFO: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF and Procure Space ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
ROKT vs UFO: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
- Fees. ROKT is cheaper at 0.45% a year versus 0.75% for UFO. On $10,000 that is $30 a year less in fees.
- Income. UFO pays more income, yielding 0.39% over the last twelve months versus 0.21% for ROKT. That is about $18 more a year on $10,000. Both pay quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, ROKT returned 149.5% versus 38.2% for UFO, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $24,949 in ROKT and $13,819 in UFO.
- Risk. UFO has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -49.2%, against -26.7% for ROKT.
- Diversification. UFO holds 66 positions and ROKT holds 37. The ten largest positions make up 38.4% of ROKT and 55.5% of UFO.
- Overlap. 29% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 15 shared holdings.
- Dividend growth. UFO grew its yearly payout -12.7% a year over the last 4 years, versus -16.4% for ROKT.
- Size. UFO is the larger fund with $467 million in assets, against $153 million for ROKT.
Bottom line: ROKT fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns. UFO fits better if you care most about faster dividend growth and broader diversification.
Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
| Metric | ROKT State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF | UFO Procure Space ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 0.21% | 0.39% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $0.21 | $0.15 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.0507 on Sep 23, 2026 | $0.0041 on Sep 30, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 21, 2026 | Sep 29, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | -16.4% over 4 yrs | -12.7% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $100.67 | $39.44 |
| Dividend growth streak | 4 years | — |
| Beta | 1.43 | 1.86 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -26.7% | -49.2% |
| Market cap | $151.8M | $1.02B |
| Exchange | AMEX | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.45% | 0.75% |
| Assets under management | $152.6M | $467.3M |
| Number of holdings | 37 | 66 |
| Top 10 concentration | 38.4% | 55.5% |
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.
ROKT
$1.73/mo
$21 /yr at 0.21% yield
UFO
$3.22/mo
$39 /yr at 0.39% yield
Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. ROKT pays quarterly; UFO pays quarterly.
| Year | ROKT | UFO |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $0.3486 | $0.1772 |
| 2024 | $0.3257 | $0.5036 |
| 2023 | $0.2792 | $0.4499 |
| 2022 | $0.2110 | $0.6140 |
| 2021 | $0.7125 | $0.3050 |
Strategy: Sector and thematic
Funds that hold a single industry or theme, such as technology, semiconductors, healthcare or energy. Funds covering the same sector can still differ in concentration rules: some cap the largest positions while others let the biggest companies take a quarter of the fund. Sector funds are usually used to tilt a portfolio rather than as its core.
A single sector can fall far further than the broad market and stay down for years, and the largest names often dominate the fund.
Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $24,949 in ROKT and $13,819 in UFO.
| Period | ROKT | UFO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -4.81% | -8.72% |
| 3 months | -6.15% | -9.60% |
| Year to date | 18.31% | 2.04% |
| 1 year | 25.99% | 1.62% |
| 3 years | 162.78% | 160.85% |
| 5 years | 149.49% | 38.19% |
- ROKT
- UFO
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
- ROKT
- UFO
ROKT vs UFO holdings overlap
29% overlap by weight, with 15 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
| Largest shared holdings | ROKT weight | UFO weight |
|---|---|---|
| IRDMIRIDIUM COMMUNICATIONS INC | 3.50% | 3.19% |
| LMTLOCKHEED MARTIN CORP | 3.78% | 2.68% |
| NOCNORTHROP GRUMMAN CORP | 3.39% | 2.55% |
| LHXL3HARRIS TECHNOLOGIES INC | 2.91% | 2.54% |
| RTXRTX CORP | 3.91% | 2.51% |
| VSATVIASAT INC | 2.49% | 4.21% |
| BABOEING CO/THE | 3.31% | 2.42% |
| RKLBROCKET LAB CORP | 1.76% | 4.29% |
| PLPLANET LABS PBC | 1.59% | 2.98% |
| RDWREDWIRE CORP | 2.05% | 1.57% |
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.
ROKT37 holdings total
Quick verdict
ROKT fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns and smaller drawdowns. UFO fits better if you care most about faster dividend growth and broader diversification. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how ROKT vs UFO fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.
Frequently asked questions
Is ROKT or UFO better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. ROKT currently yields 0.21% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while UFO yields 0.39%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between ROKT and UFO?
State Street SPDR S&P Kensho Final Frontiers ETF (ROKT) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Procure Space ETF (UFO) is an ETF listed on NASDAQ. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, ROKT or UFO?
ROKT has the lower expense ratio. ROKT charges 0.45% a year and UFO charges 0.75%, a difference of $30 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, ROKT or UFO?
Over the last 5 years, ROKT has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: ROKT returned 149.5% and UFO returned 38.2%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, ROKT or UFO?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, UFO has been riskier: ROKT fell as much as 26.7% and UFO as much as 49.2%. Their betas are 1.43 and 1.86.
How much do ROKT and UFO overlap?
About 29% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 15 shared holdings. The largest shared positions are IRDM, LMT, NOC. Holding both still adds meaningful diversification.
How often do ROKT and UFO pay dividends?
Both pay quarterly. The most recent payments were $0.0507 for ROKT and $0.0041 for UFO.
How much income does $10,000 in ROKT vs UFO generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in ROKT would generate roughly $1.73 per month ($21 annually). The same amount in UFO would produce about $3.22 per month ($39 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both ROKT and UFO?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare ROKT vs UFO with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how ROKT and UFO fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.