Dividend comparison

ARKX vs UFO: Which Is Better?

Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF and Procure Space ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.

Start freeOpen interactive compareSee pricing
ARKX vs UFO: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
  • Fees. Both charge about 0.75% a year, so cost is not what separates them.
  • Performance. Over the last 3 years, UFO returned 160.8% versus 128.1% for ARKX, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $26,085 in UFO and $22,805 in ARKX.
  • Risk. UFO has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 3 years was -49.2%, against -43.5% for ARKX.
  • Diversification. UFO holds 66 positions and ARKX holds 45.

Bottom line: ARKX fits better if you care most about smaller drawdowns. UFO fits better if you care most about stronger 3-year returns.

Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
MetricARKX
ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF
UFO
Procure Space ETF
Dividend yield (TTM)—0.39%
Dividend / share (TTM)—$0.15
Payout frequency—Quarterly
Last dividend—$0.0041 on Sep 30, 2026
Ex-dividend date—Sep 29, 2026
Dividend growth (CAGR)—-12.7% over 4 yrs
Price$30.08$39.44
Beta1.641.86
Max drawdown (5Y)-43.5%-49.2%
Market cap$462.3M$1.02B
ExchangeCBOENASDAQ
Expense ratio0.75%0.75%
Assets under management$737.1M$467.3M
Number of holdings4566
Top 10 concentration—55.5%
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.

ARKX

—/mo

Yield data unavailable

UFO

$3.22/mo

$39 /yr at 0.39% yield

Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year.
YearARKXUFO
2025—$0.1772
2024—$0.5036
2023—$0.4499
2022—$0.6140
2021—$0.3050
Strategy: Sector and thematic
Funds that hold a single industry or theme, such as technology, semiconductors, healthcare or energy. Funds covering the same sector can still differ in concentration rules: some cap the largest positions while others let the biggest companies take a quarter of the fund. Sector funds are usually used to tilt a portfolio rather than as its core.

A single sector can fall far further than the broad market and stay down for years, and the largest names often dominate the fund.

Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Nov 1, 2021 would now be worth $14,677 in ARKX and $13,892 in UFO.
PeriodARKXUFO
1 month-6.35%-8.72%
3 months-0.73%-9.60%
Year to date3.80%2.04%
1 year-2.08%1.62%
3 years128.05%160.85%
5 years—38.19%
  • ARKX
  • UFO
40131222202120222023202420252026147139

Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-11-01 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
  • ARKX
  • UFO
0%15%30%44%59%Industrials59.1%56.9%Technology26.8%22.7%Communication Services4.5%20.4%Consumer Cyclical9.6%Cash & Others9.1%0.0%Healthcare0.1%
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.

UFO66 holdings total

NameWeight
SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies Corp16.15%
TRMBTrimble Inc5.46%
GRMNGarmin Ltd5.44%
ECHOEchoStar Corp4.86%
SIRISirius XM Holdings Inc4.81%
RKLBRocket Lab Corp4.29%
VSATViasat Inc4.21%
ASTSAST SpaceMobile Inc3.62%
GSATGlobalstar Inc3.43%
MDA.TOMDA Space Ltd3.26%

Quick verdict

ARKX fits better if you care most about smaller drawdowns. UFO fits better if you care most about stronger 3-year returns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.

Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how ARKX vs UFO fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.
Start freeInteractive DRIP compare

Frequently asked questions

Is ARKX or UFO better for dividend income?
Compare yield, payout sustainability, and how each fund or stock fits your income goals. Use Dividend Wealth to model both holdings inside a real portfolio forecast.
What is the difference between ARKX and UFO?
ARK Space & Defense Innovation ETF (ARKX) is an ETF listed on CBOE. Procure Space ETF (UFO) is an ETF listed on NASDAQ. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, ARKX or UFO?
They cost about the same: ARKX charges 0.75% a year and UFO charges 0.75%.
Which has performed better, ARKX or UFO?
Over the last 3 years, UFO has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: ARKX returned 128.1% and UFO returned 160.8%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, ARKX or UFO?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, UFO has been riskier: ARKX fell as much as 43.5% and UFO as much as 49.2%. Their betas are 1.64 and 1.86.
Can I hold both ARKX and UFO?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare ARKX vs UFO with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how ARKX and UFO fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.

Related comparisons

For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.