Dividend comparison
QYLD vs RYLD: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF and Global X - Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. Both charge about 0.60% a year, so cost is not what separates them.
- Income. RYLD pays more income, yielding 12.32% over the last twelve months versus 11.66% for QYLD. That is about $66 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, QYLD returned 34.3% versus -1.1% for RYLD, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $13,431 in QYLD and $9,889 in RYLD.
- Risk. QYLD has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -24.5%, against -21.5% for RYLD.
- Diversification. QYLD holds 102 positions and RYLD holds 8. The ten largest positions make up 48.9% of QYLD and 100.0% of RYLD.
- Overlap. QYLD and RYLD share no holdings, so they behave as separate building blocks.
- Dividend growth. QYLD grew its yearly payout -2.0% a year over the last 4 years, versus -9.1% for RYLD.
- Size. QYLD is the larger fund with $8.4 billion in assets, against $1.3 billion for RYLD.
Bottom line: QYLD fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. RYLD fits better if you care most about more income today and smaller drawdowns.
| Metric | QYLD Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | RYLD Global X - Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 11.66% | 12.32% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $2.13 | $1.87 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.1767 on Sep 24, 2026 | $0.1475 on Sep 24, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 19, 2026 | Oct 19, 2026 |
| Next payment | $0.1830 on Oct 22, 2026 | $0.1480 on Oct 22, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | -2.0% over 4 yrs | -9.1% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $18.28 | $15.19 |
| Beta | 0.48 | 0.54 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -24.5% | -21.5% |
| Market cap | $8.38B | $1.29B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.60% |
| Assets under management | $8.36B | $1.29B |
| Number of holdings | 102 | 8 |
| Top 10 concentration | 48.9% | 100.0% |
QYLD
$97.14/mo
$1166 /yr at 11.66% yield
RYLD
$102.65/mo
$1232 /yr at 12.32% yield
| Year | QYLD | RYLD |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.3793 | $2.0022 |
| 2024 | $2.1045 | $1.9660 |
| 2023 | $2.0380 | $2.1365 |
| 2022 | $2.5261 | $2.6570 |
| 2021 | $2.5810 | $2.9360 |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What QYLD vs RYLD actually do
It follows the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index: hold the constituents, then write a one-month index call struck at roughly the current level. Writing at the money collects the maximum premium but leaves almost no room to participate when the index rises, so in an up year the fund keeps the premium and forfeits the move. Global X's stated guideline caps the monthly distribution at the lower of half the premiums received or 1% of net asset value, with the excess reinvested.
Suits an investor whose priority is the largest, steadiest monthly payment available from Nasdaq exposure and who does not need the principal to grow. It is a poor long-horizon holding: surrendering nearly all upside on a high-growth index while paying out the premium has historically left the share price grinding lower over full cycles.
Maximum current income, capped upside
| Period | QYLD | RYLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.49% | -2.57% |
| 3 months | 2.64% | -6.00% |
| Year to date | 3.45% | -0.72% |
| 1 year | 6.96% | -0.20% |
| 3 years | 42.70% | 21.33% |
| 5 years | 34.31% | -1.11% |
- QYLD
- RYLD
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- QYLD
- RYLD
QYLD102 holdings total
Quick verdict
QYLD fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. RYLD fits better if you care most about more income today and smaller drawdowns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is QYLD or RYLD better for dividend income?
What is the difference between QYLD and RYLD?
Which is cheaper, QYLD or RYLD?
Which has performed better, QYLD or RYLD?
Which is riskier, QYLD or RYLD?
How often do QYLD and RYLD pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in QYLD vs RYLD generate?
Can I hold both QYLD and RYLD?
Where can I compare QYLD vs RYLD with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.