Dividend comparison
JEPQ vs RYLD: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF and Global X - Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% a year versus 0.60% for RYLD. On $10,000 that is $25 a year less in fees.
- Income. RYLD pays more income, yielding 12.32% over the last twelve months versus 11.58% for JEPQ. That is about $74 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 3 years, JEPQ returned 61.0% versus 21.3% for RYLD, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $16,100 in JEPQ and $12,133 in RYLD.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 3 years were similar: -20.1% for JEPQ and -21.5% for RYLD from peak to trough.
- Diversification. JEPQ holds 110 positions and RYLD holds 8. The ten largest positions make up 43.1% of JEPQ and 100.0% of RYLD.
- Dividend growth. JEPQ grew its yearly payout 7.6% a year over the last 2 years, versus -9.1% for RYLD.
- Size. JEPQ is the larger fund with $43.8 billion in assets, against $1.3 billion for RYLD.
Bottom line: JEPQ fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 3-year returns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. RYLD fits better if you care most about more income today.
| Metric | JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | RYLD Global X - Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 11.58% | 12.32% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $6.88 | $1.87 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.5669 on Oct 5, 2026 | $0.1475 on Sep 24, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Oct 19, 2026 |
| Next payment | — | $0.1480 on Oct 22, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 7.6% over 2 yrs | -9.1% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $59.44 | $15.19 |
| Dividend growth streak | 2 years | — |
| Beta | 0.83 | 0.54 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -20.1% | -21.5% |
| Market cap | $43.19B | $1.29B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.60% |
| Assets under management | $43.83B | $1.29B |
| Number of holdings | 110 | 8 |
| Top 10 concentration | 43.1% | 100.0% |
JEPQ
$96.52/mo
$1158 /yr at 11.58% yield
RYLD
$102.65/mo
$1232 /yr at 12.32% yield
| Year | JEPQ | RYLD |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $6.0025 | $2.0022 |
| 2024 | $5.3800 | $1.9660 |
| 2023 | $5.1840 | $2.1365 |
| 2022 | — | $2.6570 |
| 2021 | — | $2.9360 |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What JEPQ vs RYLD actually do
The equity sleeve stays close to the Nasdaq-100 while applying JPMorgan's own research overlay, and equity-linked notes supply the short call exposure on the index. Because Nasdaq-100 options carry higher implied volatility than S&P 500 options, the fund collects more premium and pays a bigger monthly distribution than its S&P 500 sibling. The trade is symmetrical: the underlying portfolio is more volatile, so drawdowns are deeper and the capped upside costs more in a technology-led melt-up.
Suits an income investor who wants exposure to large-cap technology but would rather be paid monthly than wait for capital gains. Not a fit for anyone who wants full participation in Nasdaq rallies or who cannot tolerate a growth-heavy, concentrated portfolio underneath the options.
Aggressive equity income
| Period | JEPQ | RYLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -1.33% | -2.57% |
| 3 months | 1.59% | -6.00% |
| Year to date | 2.27% | -0.72% |
| 1 year | 4.26% | -0.20% |
| 3 years | 61.00% | 21.33% |
| 5 years | — | -1.11% |
- JEPQ
- RYLD
Both series indexed to 100 on 2022-05-04 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- JEPQ
- RYLD
JEPQ110 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP COMMON STOCK | 7.17% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC COMMON STOCK | 6.73% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP COMMON | 5.54% |
| GOOGALPHABET INC-CL C - | 4.83% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 4.29% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC COMMON | 4.02% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 3.55% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 2.96% |
| TSLATESLA INC COMMON STOCK | 2.13% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC COMMON | 1.90% |
Quick verdict
JEPQ fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 3-year returns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. RYLD fits better if you care most about more income today. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is JEPQ or RYLD better for dividend income?
What is the difference between JEPQ and RYLD?
Which is cheaper, JEPQ or RYLD?
Which has performed better, JEPQ or RYLD?
Which is riskier, JEPQ or RYLD?
How often do JEPQ and RYLD pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in JEPQ vs RYLD generate?
Can I hold both JEPQ and RYLD?
Where can I compare JEPQ vs RYLD with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.