Dividend comparison
GPIX vs QYLD: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF and Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. GPIX is cheaper at 0.35% a year versus 0.60% for QYLD. On $10,000 that is $25 a year less in fees.
- Income. QYLD pays more income, yielding 11.66% over the last twelve months versus 8.20% for GPIX. That is about $346 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 3 years, GPIX returned 567.8% versus 42.7% for QYLD, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $66,778 in GPIX and $14,270 in QYLD.
- Risk. GPIX has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 3 years was -100.0%, against -24.5% for QYLD.
- Diversification. GPIX holds 488 positions and QYLD holds 102. The ten largest positions make up 39.4% of GPIX and 48.9% of QYLD.
- Overlap. At least 47% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 34 shared holdings.
Bottom line: GPIX fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 3-year returns and broader diversification. QYLD fits better if you care most about more income today and smaller drawdowns.
| Metric | GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | QYLD Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 8.20% | 11.66% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $4.59 | $2.13 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.3970 on Oct 7, 2026 | $0.1767 on Sep 24, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Oct 19, 2026 |
| Next payment | — | $0.1830 on Oct 22, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | — | -2.0% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $55.96 | $18.28 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | — |
| Beta | 0.84 | 0.48 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -100.0% | -24.5% |
| Market cap | $1.16B | $8.38B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.60% |
| Assets under management | $6.24B | $8.36B |
| Number of holdings | 488 | 102 |
| Top 10 concentration | 39.4% | 48.9% |
GPIX
$68.30/mo
$820 /yr at 8.20% yield
QYLD
$97.14/mo
$1166 /yr at 11.66% yield
| Year | GPIX | QYLD |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $4.2301 | $2.3793 |
| 2024 | $3.9993 | $2.1045 |
| 2023 | — | $2.0380 |
| 2022 | — | $2.5261 |
| 2021 | — | $2.5810 |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What GPIX vs QYLD actually do
The fund writes calls on a varying portion of the portfolio rather than a fixed slice, so the manager can lean into premium when volatility is rich and pull back when it is not. Because the underlying index is broader and less volatile than the Nasdaq-100, the premium collected is lower and the distribution is smaller than the technology-focused version. Like its sibling, it is priced far closer to a plain index fund than to a typical derivative-income product.
Suits an investor who wants most of the S&P 500 experience with a meaningfully larger cash payout and low fee drag. Not for someone who wants either an untouched index return or the largest distribution on the shelf.
Balanced income and growth
It follows the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index: hold the constituents, then write a one-month index call struck at roughly the current level. Writing at the money collects the maximum premium but leaves almost no room to participate when the index rises, so in an up year the fund keeps the premium and forfeits the move. Global X's stated guideline caps the monthly distribution at the lower of half the premiums received or 1% of net asset value, with the excess reinvested.
Suits an investor whose priority is the largest, steadiest monthly payment available from Nasdaq exposure and who does not need the principal to grow. It is a poor long-horizon holding: surrendering nearly all upside on a high-growth index while paying out the premium has historically left the share price grinding lower over full cycles.
Maximum current income, capped upside
| Period | GPIX | QYLD |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 0.43% | -0.49% |
| 3 months | 1.69% | 2.64% |
| Year to date | 6.75% | 3.45% |
| 1 year | 8.41% | 6.96% |
| 3 years | 567.78% | 42.70% |
| 5 years | — | 34.31% |
- GPIX
- QYLD
Both series indexed to 100 on 2023-10-19 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- GPIX
- QYLD
| Largest shared holdings | GPIX weight | QYLD weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORPORATION | 7.99% | 8.55% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC. | 7.55% | 7.80% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORPORATION | 5.99% | 6.30% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 3.81% | 4.39% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC. | 3.36% | 3.25% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC. | 2.34% | 2.65% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 1.55% | 4.83% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A | 1.54% | 3.46% |
| TSLATESLA INC. | 1.48% | 3.11% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC. | 1.33% | 4.20% |
GPIX488 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORPORATION | 7.99% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC. | 7.55% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORPORATION | 5.99% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 3.81% |
| XLCSTATE STREET COMMUNICATION SERVICES SELECT SECTOR | 3.77% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC. | 3.36% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC. | 2.34% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 1.55% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A | 1.54% |
| BRK-BBERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. | 1.51% |
Quick verdict
GPIX fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 3-year returns and broader diversification. QYLD fits better if you care most about more income today and smaller drawdowns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is GPIX or QYLD better for dividend income?
What is the difference between GPIX and QYLD?
Which is cheaper, GPIX or QYLD?
Which has performed better, GPIX or QYLD?
Which is riskier, GPIX or QYLD?
How much do GPIX and QYLD overlap?
How often do GPIX and QYLD pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in GPIX vs QYLD generate?
Can I hold both GPIX and QYLD?
Where can I compare GPIX vs QYLD with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.