Dividend comparison
NOBL vs FDVV: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and Fidelity High Dividend ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. FDVV is cheaper at 0.15% a year versus 0.35% for NOBL. On $10,000 that is $20 a year less in fees.
- Income. FDVV pays more income, yielding 2.77% over the last twelve months versus 2.04% for NOBL. That is about $73 more a year on $10,000. NOBL pays quarterly, FDVV pays monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, FDVV returned 80.6% versus 36.7% for NOBL, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $18,061 in FDVV and $13,672 in NOBL.
- Risk. FDVV has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -20.2%, against -17.9% for NOBL.
- Diversification. FDVV holds 119 positions and NOBL holds 71. The ten largest positions make up 16.8% of NOBL and 36.5% of FDVV.
- Overlap. 12% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 13 shared holdings. They mostly own different companies, so they can complement each other.
- Dividend growth. FDVV grew its yearly payout 10.7% a year over the last 4 years, versus 4.6% for NOBL.
Bottom line: FDVV has the edge on these figures, with lower fees, more income today, stronger 5-year returns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. NOBL does not lead on any of the measures compared here.
| Metric | NOBL ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | FDVV Fidelity High Dividend ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 2.04% | 2.77% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $1.17 | $1.71 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.2825 on Sep 29, 2026 | $0.3620 on Sep 22, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 23, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 4.6% over 4 yrs | 10.7% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $57.49 | $61.84 |
| Dividend growth streak | 3 years | 1 year |
| Beta | 0.62 | 0.78 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -17.9% | -20.2% |
| Market cap | $11.51B | $10.17B |
| Exchange | CBOE | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Assets under management | $11.44B | $10.17B |
| Number of holdings | 71 | 119 |
| Top 10 concentration | 16.8% | 36.5% |
NOBL
$17.00/mo
$204 /yr at 2.04% yield
FDVV
$23.10/mo
$277 /yr at 2.77% yield
| Year | NOBL | FDVV |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.1127 | $1.6360 |
| 2024 | $1.0226 | $1.4700 |
| 2023 | $0.9969 | $1.5920 |
| 2022 | $0.8720 | $1.2830 |
| 2021 | $0.9301 | $1.0880 |
Expect stretches of underperformance versus the broad market whenever leadership comes from the high-growth, low-yield companies these screens exclude.
| Period | NOBL | FDVV |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 3.81% | -0.32% |
| 3 months | 2.19% | -0.51% |
| Year to date | 12.20% | 9.08% |
| 1 year | 14.09% | 10.45% |
| 3 years | 42.58% | 73.46% |
| 5 years | 36.72% | 80.61% |
- NOBL
- FDVV
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- NOBL
- FDVV
| Largest shared holdings | NOBL weight | FDVV weight |
|---|---|---|
| KOCOCA-COLA CO/THE | 1.63% | 2.16% |
| PGPROCTER & GAMBLE CO/THE | 1.52% | 1.91% |
| PEPPEPSICO INC | 1.41% | 1.32% |
| MCDMCDONALD'S CORP | 1.32% | 1.26% |
| LOWLOWE'S COS INC | 1.38% | 1.12% |
| NEENEXTERA ENERGY INC | 1.25% | 1.11% |
| ESEVERSOURCE ENERGY | 1.24% | 0.98% |
| IBMINTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 1.65% | 0.89% |
| OREALTY INCOME CORP | 1.22% | 0.77% |
| JNJJOHNSON & JOHNSON | 1.42% | 0.54% |
NOBL71 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| BDXBECTON DICKINSON AND CO | 1.79% |
| FDSFACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC | 1.77% |
| ADPAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING | 1.69% |
| CVXCHEVRON CORP | 1.67% |
| XOMEXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 1.66% |
| EMREMERSON ELECTRIC CO | 1.65% |
| ERIEERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A | 1.65% |
| IBMINTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 1.65% |
| CAHCARDINAL HEALTH INC | 1.64% |
| ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.63% |
Quick verdict
FDVV has the edge on these figures, with lower fees, more income today, stronger 5-year returns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. NOBL does not lead on any of the measures compared here. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is NOBL or FDVV better for dividend income?
What is the difference between NOBL and FDVV?
Which is cheaper, NOBL or FDVV?
Which has performed better, NOBL or FDVV?
Which is riskier, NOBL or FDVV?
How much do NOBL and FDVV overlap?
How often do NOBL and FDVV pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in NOBL vs FDVV generate?
Can I hold both NOBL and FDVV?
Where can I compare NOBL vs FDVV with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.