Dividend comparison
NOBL vs DIVB: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF and iShares Core Dividend ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. DIVB is cheaper at 0.05% a year versus 0.35% for NOBL. On $10,000 that is $30 a year less in fees.
- Income. Their trailing yields are almost the same: 2.04% for NOBL and 2.13% for DIVB. Both pay quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, DIVB returned 87.2% versus 36.7% for NOBL, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $18,719 in DIVB and $13,672 in NOBL.
- Risk. DIVB has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -21.1%, against -17.9% for NOBL.
- Diversification. DIVB holds 381 positions and NOBL holds 71.
- Dividend growth. DIVB grew its yearly payout 17.4% a year over the last 4 years, versus 4.6% for NOBL.
- Size. NOBL is the larger fund with $11.4 billion in assets, against $2.1 billion for DIVB.
Bottom line: NOBL fits better if you care most about smaller drawdowns. DIVB fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification.
| Metric | NOBL ProShares - S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | DIVB iShares Core Dividend ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 2.04% | 2.13% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $1.17 | $1.48 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.2825 on Sep 29, 2026 | $0.4242 on Sep 18, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 23, 2026 | Sep 15, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 4.6% over 4 yrs | 17.4% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $57.49 | $69.69 |
| Dividend growth streak | 3 years | 1 year |
| Beta | 0.62 | 0.88 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -17.9% | -21.1% |
| Market cap | $11.51B | $1.59B |
| Exchange | CBOE | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.05% |
| Assets under management | $11.44B | $2.14B |
| Number of holdings | 71 | 381 |
| Top 10 concentration | 16.8% | — |
NOBL
$17.00/mo
$204 /yr at 2.04% yield
DIVB
$17.73/mo
$213 /yr at 2.13% yield
| Year | NOBL | DIVB |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.1127 | $1.3281 |
| 2024 | $1.0226 | $1.2369 |
| 2023 | $0.9969 | $1.3070 |
| 2022 | $0.8720 | $0.7584 |
| 2021 | $0.9301 | $0.6990 |
Expect stretches of underperformance versus the broad market whenever leadership comes from the high-growth, low-yield companies these screens exclude.
| Period | NOBL | DIVB |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 3.81% | 4.11% |
| 3 months | 2.19% | 9.11% |
| Year to date | 12.20% | 31.12% |
| 1 year | 14.09% | 33.61% |
| 3 years | 42.58% | 101.94% |
| 5 years | 36.72% | 87.19% |
- NOBL
- DIVB
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- NOBL
- DIVB
NOBL71 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| BDXBECTON DICKINSON AND CO | 1.79% |
| FDSFACTSET RESEARCH SYSTEMS INC | 1.77% |
| ADPAUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING | 1.69% |
| CVXCHEVRON CORP | 1.67% |
| XOMEXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP | 1.66% |
| EMREMERSON ELECTRIC CO | 1.65% |
| ERIEERIE INDEMNITY COMPANY-CL A | 1.65% |
| IBMINTL BUSINESS MACHINES CORP | 1.65% |
| CAHCARDINAL HEALTH INC | 1.64% |
| ROPROPER TECHNOLOGIES INC | 1.63% |
Quick verdict
NOBL fits better if you care most about smaller drawdowns. DIVB fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, faster dividend growth and broader diversification. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is NOBL or DIVB better for dividend income?
What is the difference between NOBL and DIVB?
Which is cheaper, NOBL or DIVB?
Which has performed better, NOBL or DIVB?
Which is riskier, NOBL or DIVB?
How often do NOBL and DIVB pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in NOBL vs DIVB generate?
Can I hold both NOBL and DIVB?
Where can I compare NOBL vs DIVB with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.