Dividend comparison
LQD vs VTEB: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF and Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. VTEB is cheaper at 0.03% a year versus 0.14% for LQD. On $10,000 that is $11 a year less in fees.
- Income. LQD pays more income, yielding 4.89% over the last twelve months versus 3.54% for VTEB. That is about $135 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, VTEB returned -1.4% versus -8.0% for LQD, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $9,856 in VTEB and $9,203 in LQD.
- Risk. LQD has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -24.5%, against -12.3% for VTEB.
- Diversification. LQD holds 3,181 positions and VTEB holds 2.
- Dividend growth. VTEB grew its yearly payout 16.3% a year over the last 4 years, versus 12.9% for LQD.
Bottom line: LQD fits better if you care most about more income today and broader diversification. VTEB fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and faster dividend growth.
| Metric | LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | VTEB Vanguard Tax-Exempt Bond ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 4.89% | 3.54% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $5.05 | $1.70 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.4387 on Oct 6, 2026 | $0.1372 on Oct 5, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 12.9% over 4 yrs | 16.3% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $103.22 | $47.97 |
| Dividend growth streak | 4 years | 4 years |
| Beta | 1.34 | 0.95 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -24.5% | -12.3% |
| Market cap | $28.79B | $52.43B |
| Exchange | AMEX | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.14% | 0.03% |
| Assets under management | $28.78B | $52.40B |
| Number of holdings | 3181 | 2 |
LQD
$40.76/mo
$489 /yr at 4.89% yield
VTEB
$29.50/mo
$354 /yr at 3.54% yield
| Year | LQD | VTEB |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $4.9377 | $1.6552 |
| 2024 | $4.7508 | $1.5736 |
| 2023 | $4.4203 | $1.4246 |
| 2022 | $3.4793 | $1.0336 |
| 2021 | $3.0444 | $0.9044 |
Bond prices fall when interest rates rise, and long-duration funds can lose as much as stocks in a fast rate-hiking cycle.
| Period | LQD | VTEB |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -1.41% | -0.62% |
| 3 months | -4.03% | -4.31% |
| Year to date | -6.33% | -4.61% |
| 1 year | -7.61% | -4.56% |
| 3 years | 15.14% | 8.38% |
| 5 years | -7.97% | -1.44% |
- LQD
- VTEB
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- LQD
- VTEB
Quick verdict
LQD fits better if you care most about more income today and broader diversification. VTEB fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns, smaller drawdowns and faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is LQD or VTEB better for dividend income?
What is the difference between LQD and VTEB?
Which is cheaper, LQD or VTEB?
Which has performed better, LQD or VTEB?
Which is riskier, LQD or VTEB?
How often do LQD and VTEB pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in LQD vs VTEB generate?
Can I hold both LQD and VTEB?
Where can I compare LQD vs VTEB with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.