Dividend comparison
GPIQ vs ROCQ: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. Both charge about 0.35% a year, so cost is not what separates them.
- Income. GPIQ pays more income, yielding 10.27% over the last twelve months versus 6.22% for ROCQ. That is about $405 more a year on $10,000. GPIQ pays monthly, ROCQ pays quarterly.
- Risk. GPIQ has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -100.0%, against -8.9% for ROCQ.
- Diversification. GPIQ holds 107 positions and ROCQ holds 97. The ten largest positions make up 47.9% of GPIQ and 54.6% of ROCQ.
- Overlap. 65% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 37 shared holdings.
- Size. GPIQ is the larger fund with $6.4 billion in assets, against $745 million for ROCQ.
Bottom line: GPIQ fits better if you care most about more income today. ROCQ fits better if you care most about smaller drawdowns.
| Metric | GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF | ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 10.27% | 6.22% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $5.77 | $3.38 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.5088 on Oct 7, 2026 | $0.4912 on Oct 5, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Price | $56.13 | $54.35 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | — |
| Beta | 1.16 | 1.22 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -100.0% | -8.9% |
| Market cap | $1.19B | $103.9M |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.35% |
| Assets under management | $6.37B | $745.4M |
| Number of holdings | 107 | 97 |
| Top 10 concentration | 47.9% | 54.6% |
GPIQ
$85.60/mo
$1027 /yr at 10.27% yield
ROCQ
$51.83/mo
$622 /yr at 6.22% yield
| Year | GPIQ | ROCQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $5.1860 | — |
| 2024 | $4.8875 | — |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What GPIQ vs ROCQ actually do
Rather than overwriting the whole portfolio every month, the manager sells calls against roughly 25% to 75% of the equity exposure and adjusts that share with market conditions. Leaving part of the book uncovered is the deliberate design choice: it produces a smaller distribution than a full overwrite but keeps more of a rally. Fees sit well below most options-income peers, which matters over time in a category where the overlay already caps returns.
Suits an investor who wants Nasdaq-100 income but is not willing to give up the whole upside to get the highest headline yield. Less suitable for someone comparing purely on distribution rate, since a partial overwrite by design pays less than a full one.
Balanced income and growth
| Period | GPIQ | ROCQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -1.32% | -2.88% |
| 3 months | 0.27% | -1.04% |
| Year to date | 7.10% | — |
| 1 year | 7.94% | — |
| 3 years | 599.00% | — |
| 5 years | — | — |
- GPIQ
- ROCQ
Both series indexed to 100 on 2026-04-21 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- GPIQ
- ROCQ
| Largest shared holdings | GPIQ weight | ROCQ weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORPORATION | 8.20% | 8.95% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC. | 7.84% | 8.15% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORPORATION | 6.23% | 7.08% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 4.42% | 5.17% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 4.36% | 4.94% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES INC. | 3.82% | 4.34% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC-CLASS A | 3.34% | 3.64% |
| TSLATESLA INC. | 2.95% | 2.63% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC. | 2.53% | 2.59% |
| WMTWALMART INC | 2.15% | 3.67% |
GPIQ107 holdings total
ROCQ97 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP COMMON STOCK | 8.95% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC COMMON STOCK | 8.15% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP COMMON | 7.08% |
| GOOGALPHABET INC-CL C - | 5.96% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 5.17% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC COMMON | 4.94% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 4.34% |
| WMTWALMART INC COMMON STOCK | 3.67% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 3.64% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORP COMMON | 2.65% |
Quick verdict
GPIQ fits better if you care most about more income today. ROCQ fits better if you care most about smaller drawdowns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is GPIQ or ROCQ better for dividend income?
What is the difference between GPIQ and ROCQ?
Which is cheaper, GPIQ or ROCQ?
Which is riskier, GPIQ or ROCQ?
How much do GPIQ and ROCQ overlap?
How often do GPIQ and ROCQ pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in GPIQ vs ROCQ generate?
Can I hold both GPIQ and ROCQ?
Where can I compare GPIQ vs ROCQ with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.