Dividend comparison
GPIQ vs DIVO: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. GPIQ is cheaper at 0.35% a year versus 0.56% for DIVO. On $10,000 that is $21 a year less in fees.
- Income. GPIQ pays more income, yielding 10.27% over the last twelve months versus 6.28% for DIVO. That is about $399 more a year on $10,000. GPIQ pays monthly, DIVO pays quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 3 years, GPIQ returned 599.0% versus 54.5% for DIVO, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $69,900 in GPIQ and $15,445 in DIVO.
- Risk. GPIQ has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 3 years was -100.0%, against -13.7% for DIVO.
- Diversification. GPIQ holds 107 positions and DIVO holds 30.
Bottom line: GPIQ fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today, stronger 3-year returns and broader diversification. DIVO fits better if you care most about smaller drawdowns.
| Metric | GPIQ Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF | DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 10.27% | 6.28% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $5.77 | $3.02 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.5088 on Oct 7, 2026 | $0.1890 on Sep 30, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 1, 2026 | Sep 29, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | — | 11.9% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $56.13 | $48.02 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | 3 years |
| Beta | 1.16 | 0.56 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -100.0% | -13.7% |
| Market cap | $1.19B | $8.01B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.56% |
| Assets under management | $6.37B | $7.99B |
| Number of holdings | 107 | 30 |
| Top 10 concentration | 47.9% | — |
GPIQ
$85.60/mo
$1027 /yr at 10.27% yield
DIVO
$52.35/mo
$628 /yr at 6.28% yield
| Year | GPIQ | DIVO |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $5.1860 | $2.8660 |
| 2024 | $4.8875 | $1.9013 |
| 2023 | — | $1.7085 |
| 2022 | — | $1.7074 |
| 2021 | — | $1.8280 |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What GPIQ vs DIVO actually do
Rather than overwriting the whole portfolio every month, the manager sells calls against roughly 25% to 75% of the equity exposure and adjusts that share with market conditions. Leaving part of the book uncovered is the deliberate design choice: it produces a smaller distribution than a full overwrite but keeps more of a rally. Fees sit well below most options-income peers, which matters over time in a category where the overlay already caps returns.
Suits an investor who wants Nasdaq-100 income but is not willing to give up the whole upside to get the highest headline yield. Less suitable for someone comparing purely on distribution rate, since a partial overwrite by design pays less than a full one.
Balanced income and growth
The manager runs a hand-picked book of roughly 20 to 30 large-cap dividend stocks rather than tracking an index. Instead of keeping every position covered, calls are written tactically on single names, typically when a holding has run up or its implied volatility is elevated. That preserves far more upside than a blanket index overwrite, but it makes option income lumpy and puts the outcome on manager judgment rather than a published rule.
Suits an investor who wants dividend income lifted by option premium without surrendering most of the appreciation. Less suitable for anyone who wants a fully rules-based product, the lowest fee, or the highest available distribution rate.
Moderate income with growth
| Period | GPIQ | DIVO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -1.32% | 1.37% |
| 3 months | 0.27% | 3.58% |
| Year to date | 7.10% | 7.91% |
| 1 year | 7.94% | 8.28% |
| 3 years | 599.00% | 54.45% |
| 5 years | — | 59.59% |
- GPIQ
- DIVO
Both series indexed to 100 on 2023-10-19 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- GPIQ
- DIVO
GPIQ107 holdings total
Quick verdict
GPIQ fits better if you care most about lower fees, more income today, stronger 3-year returns and broader diversification. DIVO fits better if you care most about smaller drawdowns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is GPIQ or DIVO better for dividend income?
What is the difference between GPIQ and DIVO?
Which is cheaper, GPIQ or DIVO?
Which has performed better, GPIQ or DIVO?
Which is riskier, GPIQ or DIVO?
How often do GPIQ and DIVO pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in GPIQ vs DIVO generate?
Can I hold both GPIQ and DIVO?
Where can I compare GPIQ vs DIVO with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.