Dividend comparison
QQQI vs ROCQ: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. ROCQ is cheaper at 0.35% a year versus 0.68% for QQQI. On $10,000 that is $33 a year less in fees.
- Income. QQQI pays more income, yielding 14.11% over the last twelve months versus 6.22% for ROCQ. That is about $789 more a year on $10,000. QQQI pays monthly, ROCQ pays quarterly.
- Risk. QQQI has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -20.0%, against -8.9% for ROCQ.
- Diversification. ROCQ holds 97 positions and QQQI holds 10. The ten largest positions make up 47.0% of QQQI and 54.6% of ROCQ.
- Overlap. 67% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 39 shared holdings.
- Size. QQQI is the larger fund with $15.1 billion in assets, against $745 million for ROCQ.
Bottom line: QQQI fits better if you care most about more income today. ROCQ fits better if you care most about lower fees, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification.
| Metric | QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | ROCQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Yield ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 14.11% | 6.22% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $7.64 | $3.38 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.6339 on Sep 18, 2026 | $0.4912 on Oct 5, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 16, 2026 | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Price | $54.16 | $54.35 |
| Beta | 0.93 | 1.22 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -20.0% | -8.9% |
| Market cap | $14.89B | $103.9M |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.68% | 0.35% |
| Assets under management | $15.08B | $745.4M |
| Number of holdings | 10 | 97 |
| Top 10 concentration | 47.0% | 54.6% |
QQQI
$117.57/mo
$1411 /yr at 14.11% yield
ROCQ
$51.83/mo
$622 /yr at 6.22% yield
| Year | QQQI | ROCQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $7.4435 | — |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What QQQI vs ROCQ actually do
It owns Nasdaq-100 constituents and applies the same call strategy of sold and purchased index options, sized actively rather than as a fixed full overwrite. Nasdaq-100 volatility is structurally higher, so the option premium collected is larger and the monthly distribution is bigger than the S&P 500 version. NDX options are also section 1256 contracts, so the same 60/40 tax treatment and loss-harvesting mechanics apply.
Suits someone who wants technology-heavy exposure converted into monthly cash with attention paid to tax character. A poor fit if you are holding the Nasdaq-100 specifically to compound growth, because the call overlay gives away the tail of exactly the rallies that index is bought for.
Aggressive tax-aware income
| Period | QQQI | ROCQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.42% | -2.88% |
| 3 months | -0.09% | -1.04% |
| Year to date | 0.56% | — |
| 1 year | 0.69% | — |
| 3 years | — | — |
| 5 years | — | — |
- QQQI
- ROCQ
Both series indexed to 100 on 2026-04-21 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- QQQI
- ROCQ
| Largest shared holdings | QQQI weight | ROCQ weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 8.20% | 8.95% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 7.81% | 8.15% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.11% | 7.08% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 4.47% | 4.94% |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 4.40% | 5.17% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 3.81% | 4.34% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.25% | 3.64% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.90% | 5.96% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 2.96% | 2.63% |
| WMTWalmart Inc | 2.51% | 3.67% |
QQQI10 holdings total
ROCQ97 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP COMMON STOCK | 8.95% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC COMMON STOCK | 8.15% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP COMMON | 7.08% |
| GOOGALPHABET INC-CL C - | 5.96% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 5.17% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC COMMON | 4.94% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 4.34% |
| WMTWALMART INC COMMON STOCK | 3.67% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 3.64% |
| LRCXLAM RESEARCH CORP COMMON | 2.65% |
Quick verdict
QQQI fits better if you care most about more income today. ROCQ fits better if you care most about lower fees, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is QQQI or ROCQ better for dividend income?
What is the difference between QQQI and ROCQ?
Which is cheaper, QQQI or ROCQ?
Which is riskier, QQQI or ROCQ?
How much do QQQI and ROCQ overlap?
How often do QQQI and ROCQ pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in QQQI vs ROCQ generate?
Can I hold both QQQI and ROCQ?
Where can I compare QQQI vs ROCQ with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.