Dividend comparison

FSKAX vs SPTM: Which Is Better?

Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Fidelity Total Market Index Fund and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.

FSKAX vs SPTM: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
  • Income. SPTM pays more income, yielding 1.06% over the last twelve months versus 0.92% for FSKAX. That is about $13 more a year on $10,000. FSKAX pays semi-annual, SPTM pays quarterly.
  • Performance. Over the last 5 years, SPTM returned 78.2% versus 71.1% for FSKAX, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $17,820 in SPTM and $17,110 in FSKAX.
  • Risk. Their worst declines over the last 5 years were similar: -25.4% for FSKAX and -24.1% for SPTM from peak to trough.
  • Diversification. SPTM holds 1,510 positions and FSKAX holds 100. The ten largest positions make up 33.6% of FSKAX and 35.8% of SPTM.
  • Overlap. At least 64% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 92 shared holdings.
  • Dividend growth. SPTM grew its yearly payout 6.4% a year over the last 4 years, versus 5.4% for FSKAX.

Bottom line: SPTM has the edge on these figures, with stronger 5-year returns and broader diversification. FSKAX does not lead on any of the measures compared here.

Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
MetricFSKAX
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund
SPTM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF
Dividend yield (TTM)0.92%1.06%
Dividend / share (TTM)$1.95$0.98
Payout frequencySemi-annualQuarterly
Last dividend$0.1640 on Apr 13, 2026$0.2502 on Sep 23, 2026
Ex-dividend dateApr 10, 2026Sep 21, 2026
Dividend growth (CAGR)5.4% over 4 yrs6.4% over 4 yrs
Price$211.69$92.93
Dividend growth streak—16 years
Beta1.031.01
Max drawdown (5Y)-25.4%-24.1%
Market cap$139.96B$14.03B
ExchangeNASDAQAMEX
Expense ratio—0.03%
Assets under management—$14.09B
Number of holdings1001510
Top 10 concentration33.6%35.8%
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.

FSKAX

$7.68/mo

$92 /yr at 0.92% yield

SPTM

$8.80/mo

$106 /yr at 1.06% yield

Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. FSKAX pays semi-annual; SPTM pays quarterly.
YearFSKAXSPTM
2025$1.8940$0.9340
2024$1.9120$0.9156
2023$1.8590$0.8394
2022$1.7220$0.7972
2021$1.5340$0.7290
Strategy: Broad index
Low-cost funds that hold an entire market or index at market-cap weights and make no attempt to select securities. Return is the index return less a small fee, and dividends are a by-product of what the underlying companies choose to pay rather than an objective of the strategy. Differences between funds tracking the same index usually come down to fee, wrapper structure, share price and trading liquidity, not to holdings.

Current income is low and outside your control, so these need pairing with something else if the portfolio has to produce cash today.

Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Oct 20, 2021 would now be worth $17,110 in FSKAX and $17,820 in SPTM.
PeriodFSKAXSPTM
1 month0.57%0.89%
3 months2.92%3.38%
Year to date13.30%13.61%
1 year13.95%15.71%
3 years86.10%86.64%
5 years71.10%78.20%
  • FSKAX
  • SPTM
71129187202120222023202420252026171178

Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
  • FSKAX
  • SPTM
0%9%18%27%37%Technology36.5%Financial Services12.0%Healthcare9.7%Communication Services9.3%Consumer Cyclical9.1%Industrials9.0%Consumer Defensive4.6%Energy3.8%Real Estate2.0%Utilities2.0%Other1.9%
FSKAX vs SPTM holdings overlap
At least 64% overlap by weight, with 92 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
Largest shared holdingsFSKAX weightSPTM weight
NVDANVIDIA Corp7.18%7.34%
AAPLApple Inc6.25%6.99%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.06%5.53%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc3.41%3.60%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc Class A2.67%2.82%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.35%2.22%
GOOGAlphabet Inc Class C2.13%2.26%
METAMeta Platforms Inc Class A1.69%2.17%
MUMicron Technology Inc1.45%1.43%
TSLATesla Inc1.39%1.45%
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.

FSKAX100 holdings total

NameWeight
NVDANVIDIA Corp7.18%
AAPLApple Inc6.25%
MSFTMicrosoft Corp5.06%
AMZNAmazon.com Inc3.41%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc Class A2.67%
AVGOBroadcom Inc2.35%
GOOGAlphabet Inc Class C2.13%
METAMeta Platforms Inc Class A1.69%
MUMicron Technology Inc1.45%
TSLATesla Inc1.39%

SPTM1510 holdings total

NameWeight
NVDANVIDIA CORP7.34%
AAPLAPPLE INC6.99%
MSFTMICROSOFT CORP5.53%
AMZNAMAZON.COM INC3.60%
GOOGLALPHABET INC CL A2.82%
GOOGALPHABET INC CL C2.26%
AVGOBROADCOM INC2.22%
METAMETA PLATFORMS INC CLASS A2.17%
TSLATESLA INC1.45%
MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC1.43%

Quick verdict

SPTM has the edge on these figures, with stronger 5-year returns and broader diversification. FSKAX does not lead on any of the measures compared here. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.

Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how FSKAX vs SPTM fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.

Frequently asked questions

Is FSKAX or SPTM better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. FSKAX currently yields 0.92% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while SPTM yields 1.06%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between FSKAX and SPTM?
Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) is an ETF listed on NASDAQ. State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which has performed better, FSKAX or SPTM?
Over the last 5 years, SPTM has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: FSKAX returned 71.1% and SPTM returned 78.2%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, FSKAX or SPTM?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, FSKAX has been riskier: FSKAX fell as much as 25.4% and SPTM as much as 24.1%. Their betas are 1.03 and 1.01.
How much do FSKAX and SPTM overlap?
At least 64% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 92 shared holdings. The largest shared positions are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT. Holding both still adds meaningful diversification.
How often do FSKAX and SPTM pay dividends?
FSKAX pays semi-annual and SPTM pays quarterly.
How much income does $10,000 in FSKAX vs SPTM generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in FSKAX would generate roughly $7.68 per month ($92 annually). The same amount in SPTM would produce about $8.80 per month ($106 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both FSKAX and SPTM?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare FSKAX vs SPTM with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how FSKAX and SPTM fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.

Related comparisons

For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.