Dividend comparison
VXUS vs SCHG: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. SCHG is cheaper at 0.04% a year versus 0.05% for VXUS. On $10,000 that is $1 a year less in fees.
- Income. VXUS pays more income, yielding 2.37% over the last twelve months versus 0.39% for SCHG. That is about $198 more a year on $10,000. Both pay quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, SCHG returned 85.2% versus 44.9% for VXUS, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $18,525 in SCHG and $14,485 in VXUS.
- Risk. SCHG has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 5 years was -34.6%, against -28.9% for VXUS.
- Diversification. VXUS holds 8,602 positions and SCHG holds 189. The ten largest positions make up 13.4% of VXUS and 60.9% of SCHG.
- Dividend growth. SCHG grew its yearly payout 9.4% a year over the last 4 years, versus 5.1% for VXUS.
- Size. VXUS is the larger fund with $649.3 billion in assets, against $63.7 billion for SCHG.
Bottom line: VXUS fits better if you care most about more income today, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. SCHG fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth.
| Metric | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 2.37% | 0.39% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $1.98 | $0.14 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.1562 on Sep 22, 2026 | $0.0371 on Sep 28, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 18, 2026 | Sep 23, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 5.1% over 4 yrs | 9.4% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $83.74 | $35.53 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | 4 years |
| Beta | 0.92 | 1.20 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -28.9% | -34.6% |
| Market cap | $667.22B | $63.06B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.04% |
| Assets under management | $649.30B | $63.70B |
| Number of holdings | 8602 | 189 |
| Top 10 concentration | 13.4% | 60.9% |
VXUS
$19.75/mo
$237 /yr at 2.37% yield
SCHG
$3.26/mo
$39 /yr at 0.39% yield
| Year | VXUS | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.3988 | $0.1168 |
| 2024 | $1.9842 | $0.1163 |
| 2023 | $1.8808 | $0.0903 |
| 2022 | $1.5990 | $0.0817 |
| 2021 | $1.9678 | $0.0817 |
Current income is low and outside your control, so these need pairing with something else if the portfolio has to produce cash today.
| Period | VXUS | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -2.49% | 0.40% |
| 3 months | 0.44% | 4.16% |
| Year to date | 11.00% | 9.29% |
| 1 year | 11.76% | 10.38% |
| 3 years | 72.73% | 99.05% |
| 5 years | 44.85% | 85.25% |
- VXUS
- SCHG
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- VXUS
- SCHG
VXUS8602 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| 2330.TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 4.24% |
| 005930.KSSamsung Electronics Co Ltd | 2.02% |
| 000660.KSSK hynix Inc | 1.65% |
| ASML.ASASML Holding NV | 1.54% |
| 0700.HKTencent Holdings Ltd | 0.76% |
| HSBA.LHSBC Holdings PLC | 0.76% |
| ROP.SWRoche Holding AG | 0.65% |
| SHEL.LShell PLC | 0.62% |
| RY.TORoyal Bank of Canada | 0.61% |
| NOVN.SWNovartis AG | 0.59% |
Quick verdict
VXUS fits better if you care most about more income today, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. SCHG fits better if you care most about stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is VXUS or SCHG better for dividend income?
What is the difference between VXUS and SCHG?
Which is cheaper, VXUS or SCHG?
Which has performed better, VXUS or SCHG?
Which is riskier, VXUS or SCHG?
How often do VXUS and SCHG pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in VXUS vs SCHG generate?
Can I hold both VXUS and SCHG?
Where can I compare VXUS vs SCHG with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.