Dividend comparison
VXUS vs EFA: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Vanguard Total International Stock ETF and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% a year versus 0.32% for EFA. On $10,000 that is $27 a year less in fees.
- Income. EFA pays more income, yielding 3.24% over the last twelve months versus 2.37% for VXUS. That is about $87 more a year on $10,000. Both pay quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, EFA returned 51.0% versus 44.9% for VXUS, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $15,095 in EFA and $14,485 in VXUS.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 5 years were similar: -28.9% for VXUS and -29.3% for EFA from peak to trough.
- Diversification. VXUS holds 8,602 positions and EFA holds 656.
- Dividend growth. EFA grew its yearly payout 7.3% a year over the last 4 years, versus 5.1% for VXUS.
- Size. VXUS is the larger fund with $649.3 billion in assets, against $76.9 billion for EFA.
Bottom line: VXUS fits better if you care most about lower fees and broader diversification. EFA fits better if you care most about more income today, stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth.
| Metric | VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 2.37% | 3.24% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $1.98 | $3.36 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.1562 on Sep 22, 2026 | $1.6364 on Jun 18, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 18, 2026 | Jun 15, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 5.1% over 4 yrs | 7.3% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $83.74 | $103.69 |
| Dividend growth streak | 1 year | 5 years |
| Beta | 0.92 | 0.78 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -28.9% | -29.3% |
| Market cap | $667.22B | $76.86B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.32% |
| Assets under management | $649.30B | $76.89B |
| Number of holdings | 8602 | 656 |
| Top 10 concentration | 13.4% | — |
VXUS
$19.75/mo
$237 /yr at 2.37% yield
EFA
$27.04/mo
$324 /yr at 3.24% yield
| Year | VXUS | EFA |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.3988 | $3.2473 |
| 2024 | $1.9842 | $2.4500 |
| 2023 | $1.8808 | $2.2421 |
| 2022 | $1.5990 | $1.9291 |
| 2021 | $1.9678 | $2.4540 |
Returns are exposed to currency moves and to political and regulatory risk that US investors do not face at home, and emerging markets add wide swings.
| Period | VXUS | EFA |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -2.49% | -1.22% |
| 3 months | 0.44% | 1.09% |
| Year to date | 11.00% | 9.69% |
| 1 year | 11.76% | 12.55% |
| 3 years | 72.73% | 71.16% |
| 5 years | 44.85% | 50.95% |
- VXUS
- EFA
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- VXUS
- EFA
VXUS8602 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| 2330.TWTaiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 4.24% |
| 005930.KSSamsung Electronics Co Ltd | 2.02% |
| 000660.KSSK hynix Inc | 1.65% |
| ASML.ASASML Holding NV | 1.54% |
| 0700.HKTencent Holdings Ltd | 0.76% |
| HSBA.LHSBC Holdings PLC | 0.76% |
| ROP.SWRoche Holding AG | 0.65% |
| SHEL.LShell PLC | 0.62% |
| RY.TORoyal Bank of Canada | 0.61% |
| NOVN.SWNovartis AG | 0.59% |
Quick verdict
VXUS fits better if you care most about lower fees and broader diversification. EFA fits better if you care most about more income today, stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is VXUS or EFA better for dividend income?
What is the difference between VXUS and EFA?
Which is cheaper, VXUS or EFA?
Which has performed better, VXUS or EFA?
Which is riskier, VXUS or EFA?
How often do VXUS and EFA pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in VXUS vs EFA generate?
Can I hold both VXUS and EFA?
Where can I compare VXUS vs EFA with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.