Dividend comparison
EFA vs SPDW: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for iShares MSCI EAFE ETF and State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. SPDW is cheaper at 0.03% a year versus 0.32% for EFA. On $10,000 that is $29 a year less in fees.
- Income. EFA pays more income, yielding 3.24% over the last twelve months versus 3.06% for SPDW. That is about $19 more a year on $10,000. EFA pays quarterly, SPDW pays annual.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, EFA returned 51.0% versus 50.0% for SPDW, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $15,095 in EFA and $15,005 in SPDW.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 5 years were similar: -29.3% for EFA and -29.8% for SPDW from peak to trough.
- Diversification. SPDW holds 2,437 positions and EFA holds 656.
- Dividend growth. EFA grew its yearly payout 7.3% a year over the last 4 years, versus 7.2% for SPDW.
Bottom line: SPDW has the edge on these figures, with lower fees and broader diversification. EFA does not lead on any of the measures compared here.
| Metric | EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | SPDW State Street SPDR Portfolio Developed World ex-US ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 3.24% | 3.06% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $3.36 | $1.52 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Annual |
| Last dividend | $1.6364 on Jun 18, 2026 | $0.7220 on Jun 26, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Jun 15, 2026 | Jun 22, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 7.3% over 4 yrs | 7.2% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $103.69 | $49.56 |
| Dividend growth streak | 5 years | 3 years |
| Beta | 0.78 | 1.03 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -29.3% | -29.8% |
| Market cap | $76.86B | $40.90B |
| Exchange | AMEX | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.32% | 0.03% |
| Assets under management | $76.89B | $41.04B |
| Number of holdings | 656 | 2437 |
| Top 10 concentration | — | 12.1% |
EFA
$27.04/mo
$324 /yr at 3.24% yield
SPDW
$25.49/mo
$306 /yr at 3.06% yield
| Year | EFA | SPDW |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.2473 | $1.4658 |
| 2024 | $2.4500 | $1.0898 |
| 2023 | $2.2421 | $0.9343 |
| 2022 | $1.9291 | $0.9271 |
| 2021 | $2.4540 | $1.1080 |
Returns are exposed to currency moves and to political and regulatory risk that US investors do not face at home, and emerging markets add wide swings.
| Period | EFA | SPDW |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -1.22% | -2.33% |
| 3 months | 1.09% | 0.36% |
| Year to date | 9.69% | 11.60% |
| 1 year | 12.55% | 13.33% |
| 3 years | 71.16% | 75.99% |
| 5 years | 50.95% | 50.05% |
- EFA
- SPDW
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- EFA
- SPDW
SPDW2437 holdings total
Quick verdict
SPDW has the edge on these figures, with lower fees and broader diversification. EFA does not lead on any of the measures compared here. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is EFA or SPDW better for dividend income?
What is the difference between EFA and SPDW?
Which is cheaper, EFA or SPDW?
Which has performed better, EFA or SPDW?
Which is riskier, EFA or SPDW?
How often do EFA and SPDW pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in EFA vs SPDW generate?
Can I hold both EFA and SPDW?
Where can I compare EFA vs SPDW with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.