Dividend comparison
SCHD vs DGRO: Which Is Better for Income?
Side-by-side yield, projected income, and dividend fundamentals for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF. Updated July 26, 2026.
| Metric | SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | DGRO iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | — | — |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | — | — |
| Price | $33.29 | $77.84 |
| Payout ratio (TTM) | — | — |
| Dividend growth streak | 13 years | 10 years |
| Beta | 0.58 | 0.68 |
| Market cap | $96.24B | $41.35B |
| Exchange | AMEX | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.06% | 0.08% |
| Assets under management | $102.62B | $42.63B |
| Number of holdings | 103 | 390 |
| Top 10 concentration | 41.5% | — |
SCHD
—/mo
Yield data unavailable
DGRO
—/mo
Yield data unavailable
Expect stretches of underperformance versus the broad market whenever leadership comes from the high-growth, low-yield companies these screens exclude.
What SCHD vs DGRO actually do
It tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, which first requires at least ten consecutive years of dividends, then ranks the survivors on a composite of cash flow to total debt, return on equity, dividend yield and five-year dividend growth. The top 100 are held at market-cap weights with a 4% cap per stock and 25% per sector, reconstituted annually and rebalanced quarterly. Those quality screens push the portfolio toward mature value sectors and largely out of high-growth technology, which is the single biggest reason its return diverges from the S&P 500 in either direction.
Suits an investor who wants a growing dividend stream plus share-price participation and can sit out technology-led rallies without changing course. Not a match for someone who needs the highest available current yield or wants full market exposure.
Core dividend holding
It tracks the Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index, which requires at least five consecutive years of dividend growth, a payout ratio under 75%, a positive earnings forecast, no REITs, and excludes the top 10% of the universe by yield. The five-year requirement is looser than VIG's ten, so the portfolio is broader, running to several hundred names. Holdings are weighted by the total dollar value of dividends paid rather than by market cap, which tilts weight toward the largest actual dividend payers rather than the largest companies.
Suits an investor who wants dividend growth with more names and a slightly higher starting yield than a stricter growth screen delivers. Less suitable for someone who wants concentrated exposure to only the longest-running dividend raisers.
Dividend growth, broad
| Period | SCHD | DGRO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | 4.95% | 3.46% |
| 3 months | 7.53% | 6.95% |
| Year to date | 23.34% | 12.13% |
| 1 year | 26.48% | 19.40% |
| 3 years | 47.89% | 54.11% |
| 5 years | 57.55% | 66.65% |
- SCHD
- DGRO
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-07-24 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- SCHD
- DGRO
Quick verdict
Compare the metrics above, then add both tickers to a Dividend Wealth portfolio to see combined income forecasts and diversification impact.
Frequently asked questions
Is SCHD or DGRO better for dividend income?
What is the difference between SCHD and DGRO?
Can I hold both SCHD and DGRO?
Where can I compare SCHD vs DGRO with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.