Dividend comparison
RYLD vs RDTE: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Global X - Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF and Roundhill Investments - Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
RYLD vs RDTE: key differences
The short answer, from the latest data on this page.
- Fees. RYLD is cheaper at 0.60% a year versus 0.97% for RDTE. On $10,000 that is $37 a year less in fees.
- Income. RDTE pays more income, yielding 44.20% over the last twelve months versus 12.32% for RYLD. That is about $3,188 more a year on $10,000. RYLD pays monthly, RDTE pays weekly.
- Performance. Over the last 1 year, RYLD returned -0.2% versus -20.7% for RDTE, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $9,980 in RYLD and $7,928 in RDTE.
- Risk. RDTE has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 1 year was -24.4%, against -21.5% for RYLD.
- Diversification. RYLD holds 8 positions and RDTE holds 4. The ten largest positions make up 100.0% of RYLD and 190.9% of RDTE.
- Overlap. RYLD and RDTE share no holdings, so they behave as separate building blocks.
- Size. RYLD is the larger fund with $1.3 billion in assets, against $155 million for RDTE.
Bottom line: RYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns and broader diversification. RDTE fits better if you care most about more income today.
Side-by-side snapshot
Trailing twelve-month figures where available. Higher yield is highlighted — not a buy recommendation.
| Metric | RYLD Global X - Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF | RDTE Roundhill Investments - Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 12.32% | 44.20% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $1.87 | $11.26 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Weekly |
| Last dividend | $0.1475 on Sep 24, 2026 | $0.1484 on Oct 16, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 19, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Next payment | $0.1480 on Oct 22, 2026 | — |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | -9.1% over 4 yrs | — |
| Price | $15.19 | $25.48 |
| Beta | 0.54 | 1.04 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -21.5% | -24.4% |
| Market cap | $1.29B | $154.0M |
| Exchange | AMEX | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.97% |
| Assets under management | $1.29B | $154.6M |
| Number of holdings | 8 | 4 |
| Top 10 concentration | 100.0% | 190.9% |
Income on a $10,000 investment
Illustrative only — assumes current TTM yield stays constant. Actual distributions change.
RYLD
$102.65/mo
$1232 /yr at 12.32% yield
RDTE
$368.32/mo
$4420 /yr at 44.20% yield
Dividend history
Total dividends paid per share in each calendar year. RYLD pays monthly; RDTE pays weekly.
| Year | RYLD | RDTE |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.0022 | $13.6433 |
| 2024 | $1.9660 | — |
| 2023 | $2.1365 | — |
| 2022 | $2.6570 | — |
| 2021 | $2.9360 | — |
Strategy: Options income
These funds own equities and sell call options against them, converting a share of future price appreciation into cash paid out now. How much upside is surrendered depends on the design: writing at the money on the whole portfolio pays the most and keeps the least, while writing on a partial slice or using purchased offsets keeps more of a rally. Distributions come mainly from option premium rather than from company dividends, so the headline yield is not comparable to a dividend fund's.
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
Performance
Total returns with dividends reinvested, from the adjusted closing price series. $10,000 invested on Sep 10, 2024 would now be worth $11,112 in RYLD and $9,497 in RDTE.
| Period | RYLD | RDTE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -2.57% | -4.93% |
| 3 months | -6.00% | -11.16% |
| Year to date | -0.72% | -13.22% |
| 1 year | -0.20% | -20.72% |
| 3 years | 21.33% | — |
| 5 years | -1.11% | — |
- RYLD
- RDTE
Both series indexed to 100 on 2024-09-10 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Sector allocation
Weight of each sector within the fund. Sectors are aligned on the same row so the two funds can be read against each other directly.
- RYLD
- RDTE
RYLD vs RDTE holdings overlap
0% overlap by weight, with 0 holdings in common. Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for every stock both funds own, so 100% would mean identical portfolios.
Top 10 holdings
Largest positions by portfolio weight.
RDTE4 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| 4IWM 271119C00027810IWM 11/19/2027 27.81 C | 89.61% |
| 4RUT 270319C00252300RUT 03/19/2027 252.3 C | 47.70% |
| 4RUT 261218C002462004RUT US 12/18/26 C246.2 FLX | 43.79% |
| WEEKRoundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF | 6.77% |
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | 3.04% |
Quick verdict
RYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns and broader diversification. RDTE fits better if you care most about more income today. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Still deciding? Compare them in your portfolio
Forecast dividend income, track payouts, and see how RYLD vs RDTE fits with the rest of your holdings. Free to start — no credit card required for the trial.
Frequently asked questions
Is RYLD or RDTE better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. RYLD currently yields 12.32% Trailing Twelve Months (TTM) while RDTE yields 44.20%. Higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, but may come with different risk, growth, or NAV characteristics. Compare total return and payout sustainability — not just the headline yield.
What is the difference between RYLD and RDTE?
Global X - Russell 2000 Covered Call ETF (RYLD) is an ETF listed on AMEX. Roundhill Investments - Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) is an ETF listed on CBOE. Side-by-side metrics on this page cover yield, fees, returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history when available.
Which is cheaper, RYLD or RDTE?
RYLD has the lower expense ratio. RYLD charges 0.60% a year and RDTE charges 0.97%, a difference of $37 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which has performed better, RYLD or RDTE?
Over the last 1 year, RYLD has the higher total return with dividends reinvested: RYLD returned -0.2% and RDTE returned -20.7%. Past performance does not predict future returns.
Which is riskier, RYLD or RDTE?
Measured by the worst peak-to-trough decline over the last five years, RDTE has been riskier: RYLD fell as much as 21.5% and RDTE as much as 24.4%. Their betas are 0.54 and 1.04.
How often do RYLD and RDTE pay dividends?
RYLD pays monthly and RDTE pays weekly.
How much income does $10,000 in RYLD vs RDTE generate?
At current TTM yields, $10,000 in RYLD would generate roughly $102.65 per month ($1232 annually). The same amount in RDTE would produce about $368.32 per month ($4420 annually). Actual payouts vary with distribution changes and reinvestment.
Can I hold both RYLD and RDTE?
Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify strategy or index exposure. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on overlapping holdings and factor exposure. Model both inside Dividend Wealth to see combined income, sector mix, and forecast impact.
Where can I compare RYLD vs RDTE with my full portfolio?
Create a free Dividend Wealth account to import or enter holdings, forecast dividend income, and see how RYLD and RDTE fit alongside the rest of your portfolio. A 14-day free trial of Standard is available with no credit card required; a limited Free plan is also available.
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.