Dividend comparison
QYLD vs XDTE: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF and Roundhill Investments - S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% a year versus 0.97% for XDTE. On $10,000 that is $37 a year less in fees.
- Income. XDTE pays more income, yielding 30.05% over the last twelve months versus 11.66% for QYLD. That is about $1,839 more a year on $10,000. QYLD pays monthly, XDTE pays weekly.
- Performance. Over the last 1 year, QYLD returned 7.0% versus -11.3% for XDTE, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $10,696 in QYLD and $8,872 in XDTE.
- Risk. QYLD has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 1 year was -24.5%, against -19.1% for XDTE.
- Diversification. QYLD holds 102 positions and XDTE holds 6. The ten largest positions make up 48.9% of QYLD and 192.2% of XDTE.
- Overlap. QYLD and XDTE share no holdings, so they behave as separate building blocks.
- Size. QYLD is the larger fund with $8.4 billion in assets, against $324 million for XDTE.
Bottom line: QYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns and broader diversification. XDTE fits better if you care most about more income today and smaller drawdowns.
| Metric | QYLD Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | XDTE Roundhill Investments - S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 11.66% | 30.05% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $2.13 | $11.46 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Weekly |
| Last dividend | $0.1767 on Sep 24, 2026 | $0.1440 on Oct 16, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 19, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Next payment | $0.1830 on Oct 22, 2026 | — |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | -2.0% over 4 yrs | — |
| Price | $18.28 | $38.14 |
| Beta | 0.48 | 0.92 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -24.5% | -19.1% |
| Market cap | $8.38B | $322.3M |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.97% |
| Assets under management | $8.36B | $324.2M |
| Number of holdings | 102 | 6 |
| Top 10 concentration | 48.9% | 192.2% |
QYLD
$97.14/mo
$1166 /yr at 11.66% yield
XDTE
$250.41/mo
$3005 /yr at 30.05% yield
| Year | QYLD | XDTE |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.3793 | $13.4830 |
| 2024 | $2.1045 | — |
| 2023 | $2.0380 | — |
| 2022 | $2.5261 | — |
| 2021 | $2.5810 | — |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What QYLD vs XDTE actually do
It follows the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index: hold the constituents, then write a one-month index call struck at roughly the current level. Writing at the money collects the maximum premium but leaves almost no room to participate when the index rises, so in an up year the fund keeps the premium and forfeits the move. Global X's stated guideline caps the monthly distribution at the lower of half the premiums received or 1% of net asset value, with the excess reinvested.
Suits an investor whose priority is the largest, steadiest monthly payment available from Nasdaq exposure and who does not need the principal to grow. It is a poor long-horizon holding: surrendering nearly all upside on a high-growth index while paying out the premium has historically left the share price grinding lower over full cycles.
Maximum current income, capped upside
| Period | QYLD | XDTE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.49% | -0.57% |
| 3 months | 2.64% | -0.88% |
| Year to date | 3.45% | -3.86% |
| 1 year | 6.96% | -11.28% |
| 3 years | 42.70% | — |
| 5 years | 34.31% | — |
- QYLD
- XDTE
Both series indexed to 100 on 2024-03-07 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- QYLD
- XDTE
QYLD102 holdings total
XDTE6 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| 4SPY 271119C00077430SPY 11/19/2027 77.43 C | 89.76% |
| 4SPX 270319C00678800SPX 03/19/2027 678.8 C | 67.92% |
| 4SPX 270611C00678800SPX 06/11/2027 678.8 C | 24.55% |
| WEEKRoundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF | 7.48% |
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | 2.52% |
Quick verdict
QYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns and broader diversification. XDTE fits better if you care most about more income today and smaller drawdowns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is QYLD or XDTE better for dividend income?
What is the difference between QYLD and XDTE?
Which is cheaper, QYLD or XDTE?
Which has performed better, QYLD or XDTE?
Which is riskier, QYLD or XDTE?
How often do QYLD and XDTE pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in QYLD vs XDTE generate?
Can I hold both QYLD and XDTE?
Where can I compare QYLD vs XDTE with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.