Dividend comparison
QYLD vs RDTE: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF and Roundhill Investments - Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% a year versus 0.97% for RDTE. On $10,000 that is $37 a year less in fees.
- Income. RDTE pays more income, yielding 44.20% over the last twelve months versus 11.66% for QYLD. That is about $3,254 more a year on $10,000. QYLD pays monthly, RDTE pays weekly.
- Performance. Over the last 1 year, QYLD returned 7.0% versus -20.7% for RDTE, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $10,696 in QYLD and $7,928 in RDTE.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 1 year were similar: -24.5% for QYLD and -24.4% for RDTE from peak to trough.
- Diversification. QYLD holds 102 positions and RDTE holds 4. The ten largest positions make up 48.9% of QYLD and 190.9% of RDTE.
- Overlap. QYLD and RDTE share no holdings, so they behave as separate building blocks.
- Size. QYLD is the larger fund with $8.4 billion in assets, against $155 million for RDTE.
Bottom line: QYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns and broader diversification. RDTE fits better if you care most about more income today.
| Metric | QYLD Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | RDTE Roundhill Investments - Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 11.66% | 44.20% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $2.13 | $11.26 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Weekly |
| Last dividend | $0.1767 on Sep 24, 2026 | $0.1484 on Oct 16, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 19, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Next payment | $0.1830 on Oct 22, 2026 | — |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | -2.0% over 4 yrs | — |
| Price | $18.28 | $25.48 |
| Beta | 0.48 | 1.04 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -24.5% | -24.4% |
| Market cap | $8.38B | $154.0M |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.97% |
| Assets under management | $8.36B | $154.6M |
| Number of holdings | 102 | 4 |
| Top 10 concentration | 48.9% | 190.9% |
QYLD
$97.14/mo
$1166 /yr at 11.66% yield
RDTE
$368.32/mo
$4420 /yr at 44.20% yield
| Year | QYLD | RDTE |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.3793 | $13.6433 |
| 2024 | $2.1045 | — |
| 2023 | $2.0380 | — |
| 2022 | $2.5261 | — |
| 2021 | $2.5810 | — |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What QYLD vs RDTE actually do
It follows the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index: hold the constituents, then write a one-month index call struck at roughly the current level. Writing at the money collects the maximum premium but leaves almost no room to participate when the index rises, so in an up year the fund keeps the premium and forfeits the move. Global X's stated guideline caps the monthly distribution at the lower of half the premiums received or 1% of net asset value, with the excess reinvested.
Suits an investor whose priority is the largest, steadiest monthly payment available from Nasdaq exposure and who does not need the principal to grow. It is a poor long-horizon holding: surrendering nearly all upside on a high-growth index while paying out the premium has historically left the share price grinding lower over full cycles.
Maximum current income, capped upside
| Period | QYLD | RDTE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.49% | -4.93% |
| 3 months | 2.64% | -11.16% |
| Year to date | 3.45% | -13.22% |
| 1 year | 6.96% | -20.72% |
| 3 years | 42.70% | — |
| 5 years | 34.31% | — |
- QYLD
- RDTE
Both series indexed to 100 on 2024-09-10 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- QYLD
- RDTE
QYLD102 holdings total
RDTE4 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| 4IWM 271119C00027810IWM 11/19/2027 27.81 C | 89.61% |
| 4RUT 270319C00252300RUT 03/19/2027 252.3 C | 47.70% |
| 4RUT 261218C002462004RUT US 12/18/26 C246.2 FLX | 43.79% |
| WEEKRoundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF | 6.77% |
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | 3.04% |
Quick verdict
QYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns and broader diversification. RDTE fits better if you care most about more income today. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is QYLD or RDTE better for dividend income?
What is the difference between QYLD and RDTE?
Which is cheaper, QYLD or RDTE?
Which has performed better, QYLD or RDTE?
Which is riskier, QYLD or RDTE?
How often do QYLD and RDTE pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in QYLD vs RDTE generate?
Can I hold both QYLD and RDTE?
Where can I compare QYLD vs RDTE with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.