Dividend comparison
QYLD vs QDVO: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF and Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. QDVO is cheaper at 0.56% a year versus 0.60% for QYLD. On $10,000 that is $4 a year less in fees.
- Income. QYLD pays more income, yielding 11.66% over the last twelve months versus 10.69% for QDVO. That is about $97 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 1 year, QYLD returned 7.0% versus 2.1% for QDVO, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $10,696 in QYLD and $10,208 in QDVO.
- Risk. QYLD has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 1 year was -24.5%, against -17.7% for QDVO.
- Diversification. QYLD holds 102 positions and QDVO holds 45. The ten largest positions make up 48.9% of QYLD and 58.0% of QDVO.
- Overlap. 63% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 27 shared holdings.
- Size. QYLD is the larger fund with $8.4 billion in assets, against $763 million for QDVO.
Bottom line: QYLD fits better if you care most about more income today, stronger 1-year returns and broader diversification. QDVO fits better if you care most about lower fees and smaller drawdowns.
| Metric | QYLD Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | QDVO Amplify CWP Growth & Income ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 11.66% | 10.69% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $2.13 | $3.15 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.1767 on Sep 24, 2026 | $0.2787 on Sep 30, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 19, 2026 | Sep 29, 2026 |
| Next payment | $0.1830 on Oct 22, 2026 | — |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | -2.0% over 4 yrs | — |
| Price | $18.28 | $29.46 |
| Beta | 0.48 | 1.02 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -24.5% | -17.7% |
| Market cap | $8.38B | $767.2M |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | AMEX |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.56% |
| Assets under management | $8.36B | $763.0M |
| Number of holdings | 102 | 45 |
| Top 10 concentration | 48.9% | 58.0% |
QYLD
$97.14/mo
$1166 /yr at 11.66% yield
QDVO
$89.08/mo
$1069 /yr at 10.69% yield
| Year | QYLD | QDVO |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.3793 | $2.8784 |
| 2024 | $2.1045 | — |
| 2023 | $2.0380 | — |
| 2022 | $2.5261 | — |
| 2021 | $2.5810 | — |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What QYLD vs QDVO actually do
It follows the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index: hold the constituents, then write a one-month index call struck at roughly the current level. Writing at the money collects the maximum premium but leaves almost no room to participate when the index rises, so in an up year the fund keeps the premium and forfeits the move. Global X's stated guideline caps the monthly distribution at the lower of half the premiums received or 1% of net asset value, with the excess reinvested.
Suits an investor whose priority is the largest, steadiest monthly payment available from Nasdaq exposure and who does not need the principal to grow. It is a poor long-horizon holding: surrendering nearly all upside on a high-growth index while paying out the premium has historically left the share price grinding lower over full cycles.
Maximum current income, capped upside
| Period | QYLD | QDVO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.49% | -1.41% |
| 3 months | 2.64% | -0.07% |
| Year to date | 3.45% | 1.52% |
| 1 year | 6.96% | 2.08% |
| 3 years | 42.70% | — |
| 5 years | 34.31% | — |
- QYLD
- QDVO
Both series indexed to 100 on 2024-08-22 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- QYLD
- QDVO
| Largest shared holdings | QYLD weight | QDVO weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 8.55% | 10.25% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC | 7.80% | 9.59% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 6.30% | 6.61% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 4.39% | 5.24% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 4.83% | 3.71% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 3.46% | 3.95% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 4.20% | 3.29% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC-CL A | 3.25% | 8.39% |
| TSLATESLA INC | 3.11% | 3.05% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 2.65% | 3.26% |
QYLD102 holdings total
Quick verdict
QYLD fits better if you care most about more income today, stronger 1-year returns and broader diversification. QDVO fits better if you care most about lower fees and smaller drawdowns. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is QYLD or QDVO better for dividend income?
What is the difference between QYLD and QDVO?
Which is cheaper, QYLD or QDVO?
Which has performed better, QYLD or QDVO?
Which is riskier, QYLD or QDVO?
How much do QYLD and QDVO overlap?
How often do QYLD and QDVO pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in QYLD vs QDVO generate?
Can I hold both QYLD and QDVO?
Where can I compare QYLD vs QDVO with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.