Dividend comparison
QYLD vs QDTE: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF and Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call ETF Strategy ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% a year versus 0.96% for QDTE. On $10,000 that is $36 a year less in fees.
- Income. QDTE pays more income, yielding 44.45% over the last twelve months versus 11.66% for QYLD. That is about $3,279 more a year on $10,000. QYLD pays monthly, QDTE pays weekly.
- Performance. Over the last 1 year, QYLD returned 7.0% versus -18.7% for QDTE, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $10,696 in QYLD and $8,130 in QDTE.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 1 year were similar: -24.5% for QYLD and -24.3% for QDTE from peak to trough.
- Diversification. QYLD holds 102 positions and QDTE holds 6. The ten largest positions make up 48.9% of QYLD and 191.0% of QDTE.
- Overlap. QYLD and QDTE share no holdings, so they behave as separate building blocks.
- Size. QYLD is the larger fund with $8.4 billion in assets, against $913 million for QDTE.
Bottom line: QYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns and broader diversification. QDTE fits better if you care most about more income today.
| Metric | QYLD Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | QDTE Roundhill Nasdaq-100 0DTE Covered Call ETF Strategy ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 11.66% | 44.45% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $2.13 | $12.50 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Weekly |
| Last dividend | $0.1767 on Sep 24, 2026 | $0.1292 on Oct 16, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 19, 2026 | Oct 15, 2026 |
| Next payment | $0.1830 on Oct 22, 2026 | — |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | -2.0% over 4 yrs | — |
| Price | $18.28 | $28.13 |
| Beta | 0.48 | 1.25 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -24.5% | -24.3% |
| Market cap | $8.38B | $902.1M |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.96% |
| Assets under management | $8.36B | $912.7M |
| Number of holdings | 102 | 6 |
| Top 10 concentration | 48.9% | 191.0% |
QYLD
$97.14/mo
$1166 /yr at 11.66% yield
QDTE
$370.39/mo
$4445 /yr at 44.45% yield
| Year | QYLD | QDTE |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.3793 | $13.5402 |
| 2024 | $2.1045 | — |
| 2023 | $2.0380 | — |
| 2022 | $2.5261 | — |
| 2021 | $2.5810 | — |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What QYLD vs QDTE actually do
It follows the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index: hold the constituents, then write a one-month index call struck at roughly the current level. Writing at the money collects the maximum premium but leaves almost no room to participate when the index rises, so in an up year the fund keeps the premium and forfeits the move. Global X's stated guideline caps the monthly distribution at the lower of half the premiums received or 1% of net asset value, with the excess reinvested.
Suits an investor whose priority is the largest, steadiest monthly payment available from Nasdaq exposure and who does not need the principal to grow. It is a poor long-horizon holding: surrendering nearly all upside on a high-growth index while paying out the premium has historically left the share price grinding lower over full cycles.
Maximum current income, capped upside
| Period | QYLD | QDTE |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.49% | -2.33% |
| 3 months | 2.64% | -3.43% |
| Year to date | 3.45% | -8.79% |
| 1 year | 6.96% | -18.70% |
| 3 years | 42.70% | — |
| 5 years | 34.31% | — |
- QYLD
- QDTE
Both series indexed to 100 on 2024-03-07 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- QYLD
- QDTE
QYLD102 holdings total
QDTE6 holdings total
| Name | Weight |
|---|---|
| 4QQQ 271119C00070110QQQ 11/19/2027 70.11 C | 73.39% |
| 4NDX 270319C02510150NDX 03/19/2027 2510.15 C | 25.86% |
| 4NDX 261218C024501004NDX US 12/18/26 C2450.1 FLX | 25.04% |
| 4NDX 270611C03059420NDX 06/11/2027 3059.42 C | 22.05% |
| 4NDX 260918C022500004NDX US 09/18/26 C2250 FLX | 18.15% |
| 4QQQ 270917C00070690QQQ 09/17/2027 70.69 C | 17.65% |
| WEEKRoundhill Weekly T-Bill ETF | 5.25% |
| FGXXXFirst American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/2031 | 3.59% |
Quick verdict
QYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 1-year returns and broader diversification. QDTE fits better if you care most about more income today. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is QYLD or QDTE better for dividend income?
What is the difference between QYLD and QDTE?
Which is cheaper, QYLD or QDTE?
Which has performed better, QYLD or QDTE?
Which is riskier, QYLD or QDTE?
How often do QYLD and QDTE pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in QYLD vs QDTE generate?
Can I hold both QYLD and QDTE?
Where can I compare QYLD vs QDTE with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.