Dividend comparison
QYLD vs ISPY: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF and ProShares - S&P 500 High Income ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. ISPY is cheaper at 0.55% a year versus 0.60% for QYLD. On $10,000 that is $5 a year less in fees.
- Income. QYLD pays more income, yielding 11.66% over the last twelve months versus 5.52% for ISPY. That is about $614 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 1 year, QYLD returned 7.0% versus 6.6% for ISPY, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $10,696 in QYLD and $10,661 in ISPY.
- Risk. QYLD has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 1 year was -24.5%, against -16.9% for ISPY.
- Diversification. ISPY holds 514 positions and QYLD holds 102. The ten largest positions make up 48.9% of QYLD and 44.4% of ISPY.
- Overlap. At least 42% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 36 shared holdings.
- Size. QYLD is the larger fund with $8.4 billion in assets, against $1.2 billion for ISPY.
Bottom line: QYLD fits better if you care most about more income today. ISPY fits better if you care most about lower fees, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification.
| Metric | QYLD Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | ISPY ProShares - S&P 500 High Income ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 11.66% | 5.52% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $2.13 | $2.65 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.1767 on Sep 24, 2026 | $0.2523 on Oct 7, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 19, 2026 | Oct 1, 2026 |
| Next payment | $0.1830 on Oct 22, 2026 | — |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | -2.0% over 4 yrs | — |
| Price | $18.28 | $48.05 |
| Beta | 0.48 | 0.86 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -24.5% | -16.9% |
| Market cap | $8.38B | $1.15B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | CBOE |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.55% |
| Assets under management | $8.36B | $1.16B |
| Number of holdings | 102 | 514 |
| Top 10 concentration | 48.9% | 44.4% |
QYLD
$97.14/mo
$1166 /yr at 11.66% yield
ISPY
$46.00/mo
$552 /yr at 5.52% yield
| Year | QYLD | ISPY |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.3793 | $3.9051 |
| 2024 | $2.1045 | — |
| 2023 | $2.0380 | — |
| 2022 | $2.5261 | — |
| 2021 | $2.5810 | — |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What QYLD vs ISPY actually do
It follows the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index: hold the constituents, then write a one-month index call struck at roughly the current level. Writing at the money collects the maximum premium but leaves almost no room to participate when the index rises, so in an up year the fund keeps the premium and forfeits the move. Global X's stated guideline caps the monthly distribution at the lower of half the premiums received or 1% of net asset value, with the excess reinvested.
Suits an investor whose priority is the largest, steadiest monthly payment available from Nasdaq exposure and who does not need the principal to grow. It is a poor long-horizon holding: surrendering nearly all upside on a high-growth index while paying out the premium has historically left the share price grinding lower over full cycles.
Maximum current income, capped upside
| Period | QYLD | ISPY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.49% | -0.08% |
| 3 months | 2.64% | 1.14% |
| Year to date | 3.45% | 5.30% |
| 1 year | 6.96% | 6.61% |
| 3 years | 42.70% | — |
| 5 years | 34.31% | — |
- QYLD
- ISPY
Both series indexed to 100 on 2023-12-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- QYLD
- ISPY
| Largest shared holdings | QYLD weight | ISPY weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 8.55% | 6.70% |
| AAPLAPPLE INC | 7.80% | 6.38% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 6.30% | 5.05% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 4.39% | 3.28% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC-CL A | 3.25% | 2.58% |
| GOOGALPHABET INC-CL C | 3.02% | 2.06% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 2.65% | 2.03% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 3.46% | 1.98% |
| TSLATESLA INC | 3.11% | 1.32% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 4.83% | 1.30% |
QYLD102 holdings total
Quick verdict
QYLD fits better if you care most about more income today. ISPY fits better if you care most about lower fees, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is QYLD or ISPY better for dividend income?
What is the difference between QYLD and ISPY?
Which is cheaper, QYLD or ISPY?
Which has performed better, QYLD or ISPY?
Which is riskier, QYLD or ISPY?
How much do QYLD and ISPY overlap?
How often do QYLD and ISPY pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in QYLD vs ISPY generate?
Can I hold both QYLD and ISPY?
Where can I compare QYLD vs ISPY with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.