Dividend comparison
QYLD vs FEPI: Which Is Better for Income?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. QYLD is cheaper at 0.60% a year versus 0.65% for FEPI. On $10,000 that is $5 a year less in fees.
- Income. FEPI pays more income, yielding 26.40% over the last twelve months versus 11.66% for QYLD. That is about $1,474 more a year on $10,000. Both pay monthly.
- Performance. Over the last 3 years, QYLD returned 42.7% versus 40.7% for FEPI, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $14,270 in QYLD and $14,073 in FEPI.
- Risk. FEPI has been the bumpier ride. Its worst peak-to-trough decline over the last 3 years was -100.0%, against -24.5% for QYLD.
- Diversification. QYLD holds 102 positions and FEPI holds 50. The ten largest positions make up 48.9% of QYLD and 66.7% of FEPI.
- Overlap. 52% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 14 shared holdings.
- Size. QYLD is the larger fund with $8.4 billion in assets, against $715 million for FEPI.
Bottom line: QYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. FEPI fits better if you care most about more income today.
| Metric | QYLD Global X - Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF | FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 11.66% | 26.40% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $2.13 | $10.94 |
| Payout frequency | Monthly | Monthly |
| Last dividend | $0.1767 on Sep 24, 2026 | $0.2094 on Oct 15, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Oct 19, 2026 | Oct 14, 2026 |
| Next payment | $0.1830 on Oct 22, 2026 | — |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | -2.0% over 4 yrs | — |
| Price | $18.28 | $41.43 |
| Beta | 0.48 | 1.09 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -24.5% | -100.0% |
| Market cap | $8.38B | $715.1M |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.65% |
| Assets under management | $8.36B | $714.6M |
| Number of holdings | 102 | 50 |
| Top 10 concentration | 48.9% | 66.7% |
QYLD
$97.14/mo
$1166 /yr at 11.66% yield
FEPI
$219.98/mo
$2640 /yr at 26.40% yield
| Year | QYLD | FEPI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $2.3793 | $11.6079 |
| 2024 | $2.1045 | $13.4931 |
| 2023 | $2.0380 | — |
| 2022 | $2.5261 | — |
| 2021 | $2.5810 | — |
Payouts are variable rather than contractual, are often taxed as ordinary income, and a fund that pays out more than the strategy earns will see its net asset value drift down over time.
What QYLD vs FEPI actually do
It follows the Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index: hold the constituents, then write a one-month index call struck at roughly the current level. Writing at the money collects the maximum premium but leaves almost no room to participate when the index rises, so in an up year the fund keeps the premium and forfeits the move. Global X's stated guideline caps the monthly distribution at the lower of half the premiums received or 1% of net asset value, with the excess reinvested.
Suits an investor whose priority is the largest, steadiest monthly payment available from Nasdaq exposure and who does not need the principal to grow. It is a poor long-horizon holding: surrendering nearly all upside on a high-growth index while paying out the premium has historically left the share price grinding lower over full cycles.
Maximum current income, capped upside
| Period | QYLD | FEPI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.49% | -2.95% |
| 3 months | 2.64% | 1.94% |
| Year to date | 3.45% | -9.05% |
| 1 year | 6.96% | -9.97% |
| 3 years | 42.70% | 40.73% |
| 5 years | 34.31% | — |
- QYLD
- FEPI
Both series indexed to 100 on 2023-10-04 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- QYLD
- FEPI
| Largest shared holdings | QYLD weight | FEPI weight |
|---|---|---|
| AAPLAPPLE INC | 7.80% | 6.99% |
| NVDANVIDIA CORP | 8.55% | 6.56% |
| MSFTMICROSOFT CORP | 6.30% | 6.75% |
| MUMICRON TECHNOLOGY INC | 4.83% | 6.51% |
| AMZNAMAZON.COM INC | 4.39% | 6.72% |
| AMDADVANCED MICRO DEVICES | 4.20% | 6.16% |
| METAMETA PLATFORMS INC | 3.46% | 6.47% |
| GOOGLALPHABET INC-CL A | 3.25% | 6.70% |
| TSLATESLA INC | 3.11% | 6.61% |
| AVGOBROADCOM INC | 2.65% | 6.42% |
QYLD102 holdings total
Quick verdict
QYLD fits better if you care most about lower fees, smaller drawdowns and broader diversification. FEPI fits better if you care most about more income today. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is QYLD or FEPI better for dividend income?
What is the difference between QYLD and FEPI?
Which is cheaper, QYLD or FEPI?
Which has performed better, QYLD or FEPI?
Which is riskier, QYLD or FEPI?
How much do QYLD and FEPI overlap?
How often do QYLD and FEPI pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in QYLD vs FEPI generate?
Can I hold both QYLD and FEPI?
Where can I compare QYLD vs FEPI with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.