Dividend comparison
QQQM vs ONEQ: Which Is Better?
Fees, yield, total returns, drawdowns, holdings overlap and dividend history for Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF, side by side. Updated October 21, 2026.
- Fees. QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% a year versus 0.21% for ONEQ. On $10,000 that is $6 a year less in fees.
- Income. Their trailing yields are almost the same: 0.45% for QQQM and 0.49% for ONEQ. Both pay quarterly.
- Performance. Over the last 5 years, QQQM returned 97.0% versus 83.3% for ONEQ, with dividends reinvested. $10,000 would have grown to $19,699 in QQQM and $18,335 in ONEQ.
- Risk. Their worst declines over the last 5 years were similar: -35.0% for QQQM and -35.2% for ONEQ from peak to trough.
- Diversification. ONEQ holds 1,046 positions and QQQM holds 103. The ten largest positions make up 47.2% of QQQM and 57.3% of ONEQ.
- Overlap. At least 70% of the two portfolios overlap by weight, across 84 shared holdings. Owning both adds little diversification.
- Dividend growth. QQQM grew its yearly payout 17.8% a year over the last 4 years, versus 10.6% for ONEQ.
- Size. QQQM is the larger fund with $108.6 billion in assets, against $10.9 billion for ONEQ.
Bottom line: QQQM fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. ONEQ fits better if you care most about broader diversification. With 70% overlap, most investors would hold one or the other rather than both.
| Metric | QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF | ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield (TTM) | 0.45% | 0.49% |
| Dividend / share (TTM) | $1.32 | $0.51 |
| Payout frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Last dividend | $0.3127 on Sep 25, 2026 | $0.1120 on Sep 22, 2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | Sep 21, 2026 | Sep 18, 2026 |
| Dividend growth (CAGR) | 17.8% over 4 yrs | 10.6% over 4 yrs |
| Price | $295.59 | $104.14 |
| Beta | 1.23 | 1.22 |
| Max drawdown (5Y) | -35.0% | -35.2% |
| Market cap | $78.87B | $10.94B |
| Exchange | NASDAQ | NASDAQ |
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.21% |
| Assets under management | $108.58B | $10.94B |
| Number of holdings | 103 | 1046 |
| Top 10 concentration | 47.2% | 57.3% |
QQQM
$3.71/mo
$45 /yr at 0.45% yield
ONEQ
$4.10/mo
$49 /yr at 0.49% yield
| Year | QQQM | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $1.2592 | $0.4930 |
| 2024 | $1.2755 | $0.5140 |
| 2023 | $1.0965 | $0.4020 |
| 2022 | $0.9145 | $0.3990 |
| 2021 | $0.6549 | $0.3290 |
Current income is low and outside your control, so these need pairing with something else if the portfolio has to produce cash today.
What QQQM vs ONEQ actually do
Launched in 2020 as an open-end fund, it holds identical constituents at identical weights to its older sibling and charges a lower expense ratio. The gap in fee is small in any one year but compounds across a long holding period, which is the entire reason the fund exists. What it gives up is trading depth: spreads are wider and the options market on it is thin next to QQQ's.
Suits a long-term holder accumulating Nasdaq-100 exposure inside a retirement or taxable account. Not the right choice for active traders or anyone writing options against the position.
Growth-tilted core, concentrated
| Period | QQQM | ONEQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 month | -0.34% | -0.27% |
| 3 months | 3.24% | 3.68% |
| Year to date | 16.87% | 14.36% |
| 1 year | 17.41% | 15.87% |
| 3 years | 105.29% | 107.12% |
| 5 years | 96.99% | 83.35% |
- QQQM
- ONEQ
Both series indexed to 100 on 2021-10-20 using the adjusted closing price series. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
- QQQM
- ONEQ
| Largest shared holdings | QQQM weight | ONEQ weight |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 8.17% | 11.22% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 7.82% | 10.89% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.19% | 8.54% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 4.42% | 5.86% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.28% | 3.40% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.15% | 4.34% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 3.02% | 3.04% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.94% | 4.05% |
| SPCXSpace Exploration Technologies Corp | 2.74% | 2.60% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.49% | 3.40% |
QQQM103 holdings total
Quick verdict
QQQM fits better if you care most about lower fees, stronger 5-year returns and faster dividend growth. ONEQ fits better if you care most about broader diversification. With 70% overlap, most investors would hold one or the other rather than both. Model the holding inside your real portfolio before deciding.
Frequently asked questions
Is QQQM or ONEQ better for dividend income?
What is the difference between QQQM and ONEQ?
Which is cheaper, QQQM or ONEQ?
Which has performed better, QQQM or ONEQ?
Which is riskier, QQQM or ONEQ?
How much do QQQM and ONEQ overlap?
How often do QQQM and ONEQ pay dividends?
How much income does $10,000 in QQQM vs ONEQ generate?
Can I hold both QQQM and ONEQ?
Where can I compare QQQM vs ONEQ with my full portfolio?
Related comparisons
For informational and educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Past performance and current yields do not guarantee future results. Verify figures independently before making investment decisions.